To the editor:
The treatment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) patients with refractory/relapsed disease remains a clinical challenge.1 To find a new therapeutic option for cHL, we investigated the preclinical activity of the repurposed drug auranofin (AF).2 AF is an anti-inflammatory drug used for rheumatoid arthritis and is now considered a potential anticancer drug. AF, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for clinical trials in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and in ovarian and lung cancer, seems to have application also in bacterial and parasitic infections as well as in HIV/AIDS.3
With the goal of repurposing AF for refractory cHL, we demonstrated its antitumoral activity in in vitro and in vivo tumor models. AF inhibited proliferation (Figure 1A) and clonogenic growth (supplemental Figure 1A, available on the Blood Web site) of L-1236, L-428, KM-H2, HDLM-2, and L-540 cHL-derived cell lines with IC50 ranging from 0.7 to 1.5 μM (supplemental Table 1). AF was also active in L-540 gemcitabine-resistant and HDLM-2 brentuximab-resistant cells (Figure 1A; supplemental Table 1). AF induced cytotoxic effects by promoting apoptotic stimuli: it decreased the mitochondrial membrane potential (Figure 1B) and induced cyt-c release (Figure 1B), upregulated BAX (Figure 1C) and downregulated the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 (Figure 1C) and Bcl-xL (Figure 1C) molecules, and induced caspase 3 activation (supplemental Figure 1B) and DNA fragmentation (supplemental Figure 1C). AF reduced TrxR activity (Figure 1D) and induced the accumulation of ROS (Figure 1E), which was inhibited by the ROS scavenger N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) (Figure 1E). NAC reverted apoptotic effects by AF (supplemental Figure 1D).
AF not only could exert a direct cytotoxic activity but also could counteract the survival signals from the microenvironment dependent on: (1) inflammatory cells4 expressing CD40L or CD30L; (2) collagen secreted by stromal cells and capable of activating DDR1; and (3) Jagged1 expressed by endothelial, smooth muscle, and epithelioid cells.5 In fact, AF inhibited nuclear factor κB (Figure 1F), constitutively active in cHL cells, and downmodulated its target genes IRF4 and CD40 (Figure 1G).6 It decreased DDR1 (Figure 1G) and CD30 (Figure 1G); it downmodulated the Notch1 receptor but not its ligand Jagged1 (Figure 1G).
To mimic the effects of the microenvironment, we evaluated AF activity in the presence of HL-MSCs and sCD40L. Cocultivation of cHL cells for 48 hours with HL-MSCs or conditioned medium from HL-MSCs (HL-MSCs-CM) reduced the proapoptotic effects of AF of about 50% (Figure 1H) with a minor effect of sCD40L (supplemental Figure 1E).
The cHL microenvironment is dominated by an extensive inflammatory-cell infiltrate that plays a crucial role in the pathobiology of the disease and is thought to be responsible for the minimal residual disease leading to drug resistance and relapse.4 AF decreased the secretion by cHL cells of cytokines involved in proliferation/survival, angiogenesis, and recruitment of inflammatory cells (IL-13, TNF-α, TGF-β1, VEGF, FGF-2, CCL5, CCL17, and IL-6)4 (Figure 1I; supplemental Figure 1F), leading to a reduced capability to recruit PBMCs (Figure 1J).
AF exerted a clear synergistic activity with 3 chemotherapeutic drugs widely used in cHL treatment—doxorubicin, cisplatin, and gemcitabine (supplemental Table 2, supplemental Figure 1G)—thus suggesting that it could be used in combination with drugs with different mechanisms of actions to reduce dose and toxicity and to overcome drug resistance.7
AF led to a 70% tumor growth reduction of L-540 gemcitabine-resistant–derived tumor xenografts, with minimal weight loss (Figure 1K)8 and decreased microvessel density (CD31 staining) in tumor xenograft of about 90% (Figure 1L).
Little is known about the angiogenic potential of cHL cells.9 We found for the first time that L-540-CM, obtained in SF conditions to avoid FCS activity, increased human umbilical vein endothelial cell tubulogenesis (Figure 1M) as evaluated by the total tube length and branching points (Figure 1N), whereas L-540-CM from AF-treated cells (Figure 1N), consistent with the decreased secretion of both VEGF and FGF-2 (Figure 1O), was ineffective. Thus AF could inhibit angiogenesis by cytotoxic effect on endothelial cells10 and by decreasing proangiogenic factors secreted by Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells.
In conclusion, in light of the activity observed also in the gemcitabine- and brentuximab-resistant cells, the very significant reduction of tumor mass obtained with AF used alone, the low toxicity, and the inhibition of angiogenesis and microenvironmental interactions, our results provide the rationale for the clinical assessment in cHL of AF as single or as combination therapy.
The online version of this article contains a data supplement.
Authorship
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by grant IG 15844 from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (D.A.) and by the Ministero della Salute, Ricerca Finalizzata FSN, I.R.C.C.S., Rome, Italy.
Contribution: M.C., C.B., N.C., M.M., A.P., and X.U.K. generated and interpreted data; M.C., N.C., M.S., A.C., and D.A. wrote and/or revised the manuscript; and D.A. supervised the study.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Donatella Aldinucci, Experimental Oncology 2, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, via F. Gallini 2, Aviano I-33081, Italy; e-mail: daldinucci@cro.it.
References
Author notes
M.C. and C.B. contributed equally to this study.