In this issue of Blood,Tufa et al1 demonstrate that innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) mitigate graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) by inducing T-cell senescence via interleukin-9 (IL-9), thereby reducing T-cell proliferation.
ILCs are lymphocytes that lack rearranged antigen-specific receptors.2 They are classified into 5 subsets: natural killer (NK) cells, lymphoid tissue inducer (LTi) cells, and the more recently defined group of noncytotoxic ILC1s, ILC2s, and ILC3s.2 This latter group is predominantly tissue-resident and is considered the innate counterpart of CD4+ T helper (Th) cells, with ILC1s, ILC2s, and ILC3s mirroring the cytokine profiles of Th1, Th2, and Th17/Th22 cells, respectively.2 ILCs play a crucial role in maintaining tissue homeostasis and initiating immune responses.2
The growing understanding of ILCs and their interactions with immune, epithelial, and stromal cells has raised the interest in their ability to modulate GVHD. GVHD is a potentially life-threatening complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) that occurs when immunocompetent donor T cells recognize recipient antigens as foreign and generate an immune response that damages recipient tissues.3 Preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated that ILCs can offer protection from GVHD.4-8 In a murine model, recipient-derived ILC3s reduced gastrointestinal (GI) GVHD by producing IL-22, which protected intestinal stem cells and epithelial cells from inflammatory injury.4 Infusion of donor ILC2s was effective in preventing and treating GI GVHD through IL-13–mediated accumulation of donor myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and amphiregulin-dependent maintenance of the epithelial barrier.5 Clinical studies further showed that higher frequencies of activated recipient or donor ILCs before or after allo-HCT, respectively, were associated with reduced risk of GVHD.6 Similarly, the frequency of ILCs in allo-HCT grafts inversely correlated with GVHD incidence.7 A recent study reported that human ILC3s expressing the ectoenzymes CD39 and CD73 suppressed autologous T-cell proliferation, suggesting that depletion of these ILC3s in gut tissue of patients with GVHD may contribute to uncontrolled tissue damage.8
Despite the expanding knowledge on ILCs, it remains to be explored whether and how ILCs modulate T cells in an alloreactive setting. In the present study, Tufa et al address this question using a series of in vitro assays as well as xenogeneic and allogeneic GVHD mouse models. ILC2s and ILC3s impaired T-cell proliferation in a cell contact–independent manner and increased the proportions of central memory T cells (TCM) and stem cell memory T cells (TSCM). T cells cocultured with ILC2s or ILC3s increased expression of senescence-associated surface markers, including CD57, KLRG1, TIGIT, and TIM3. These T cells also exhibited changes in regulatory protein expression indicative of cell cycle arrest, specifically upregulation of p16, p21, and p53, and downregulation of c-Myc. Additionally, T cells displayed a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), characterized by the production of multiple cytokines, including IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-10, IL-13, IL-9, and IL-22. Mechanistically, the study identified IL-9 produced by hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)–derived ILCs as a key mediator in inducing T-cell senescence and reducing T-cell proliferation. IL-9 blockade reversed these effects, whereas the addition of exogenous IL-9 to T cells mimicked the impact of an ILC coculture. Adoptive transfer of human HSC–derived ILCs improved GVHD in a xenogeneic mouse model. Similarly, murine ILCs derived from common lymphoid progenitor cells prevented GVHD in an allogeneic murine model without impacting graft-versus-tumor effects.
In summary, the study identifies T-cell senescence induced by ILC-derived IL-9 as a mechanism to mitigate GVHD. Future investigations are needed to clarify the downstream signaling pathways through which IL-9 promotes T-cell senescence. ILC-derived IL-9 may also have indirect effects on T cells by impacting other immune-cell subsets in vivo. Additionally, factors specific to the tissue environment, such as cross talk with nonhematopoietic cells, microbiota composition, and local cytokines, may promote context-dependent differences between ILC2 and ILC3 function, adding complexity beyond the controlled conditions of experimental models. Furthermore, given that senescence is closely linked to aging, studies using T cells from older donors are warranted to explore whether age affects ILC-mediated modulation of GVHD.
Although certain questions remain, the study by Tufa et al builds a strong foundation for future investigations by providing the first in vitro and in vivo evidence that ILCs can influence the fate of alloreactive T cells. It expands the current understanding of ILCs beyond tissue protection and highlights their potential to directly shape alloreactive T-cell responses. ILC-mediated T-cell modulation may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for GVHD, as functional reprogramming of T cells may offer a more targeted approach than broad immunosuppression. These insights hold promising translational potential and support further clinical investigation.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests.