Oxidized low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) and macrophages play a central role in atherosclerosis. Here, we obtained evidence that oxLDL induced hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) protein accumulation in human macrophages (Mono-Mac-6) under normoxia. HIF-1α accumulation was attenuated by pretreatment with the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC), the nitric oxide (NO) donor S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase inhibitors such as diphenyleniodonium (DPI) or 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF), thus implicating the contribution of oxLDL-generated reactive oxygen species (ROS). Whereas oxLDL did not modulate HIF-1α mRNA levels, experiments with cycloheximide pointed to a translational mechanism in oxLDL action. HIF-1–dependent luciferase reporter gene analysis underscored HIF-1 transactivation. Our results indicate that oxLDL induced HIF-1α accumulation and HIF-1–dependent reporter gene activation in human macrophages via a redox-mediated pathway. This finding may suggest a role of HIF-1 in atherosclerosis and oxLDL-induced pathogenesis.

Oxidatively modified low-density lipoprotein (oxLDL) emerged as a pathogenetic factor in atherosclerosis.1  There is accumulating evidence for oxidative stress in vascular dysfunction/atherogenesis and a significant contribution of macrophages in oxLDL uptake, foam cell formation, and disease progression.1  Considering the role of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidases in generating (reactive oxygen species) ROS, we recently demonstrated that NADPH oxidase is a major source of ROS in response to oxLDL with the further notion that diphenyleniodonium (DPI), a NADPH oxidase inhibitor, eliminated ROS generation in macrophages.2 

Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is a heterodimeric transcription factor composed of α and β subunits.3  Although HIF-1β is constitutively expressed in many cell types, HIF-1α is present at undetectable amounts under normoxia because of rapid proteasomeal degradation and is stabilized on hypoxia.4,5  Following HIF-1α/HIF-1β heterodimerization and translocation to the nucleus, binding to promoter-specific HRE (hypoxia response element) sites drives classical hypoxia responsive genes.6,7  Studies suggested that ROS provides a redox signal for hypoxic HIF-1 induction.8  Moreover, ROS appears to regulate HIF-1 under normoxia. In some cell types, increased ROS production has been associated with HIF-1 activation by hormones, growth factors, and transition metals.8,9  In addition, direct exposure of cells to ROS may stabilize HIF-1α and promote vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression.8,10  Along that line cytokine-mediated regulation of HIF-1 may require a nonhypoxic but ROS-sensitive pathway.11 

Here, we showed that oxLDL provoked HIF-1α accumulation and HIF-1–dependent transcriptional activation in human Mono-Mac-6 (MM6) macrophages through a ROS-dependent pathway.

Cell cultures

MM6 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% nonessential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 9 μg/mL bovine insulin and antibiotics in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. Cell dishes at 80% to 90% confluence were exposed to native low-density lipoprotein (nLDL), oxLDL, and/or inhibitors. RCC4 cells, which constitutively express HIF-1α were kindly provided by Prof Ratcliffe, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.12,13  nLDL was purchased from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany) and oxidized as described.2 

Western blot analysis

HIF-1α (antibody from Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany) as well as actin (to confirm equal protein loading) was determined by Western analysis as described.14 

Transient transfection

MM6 cells (5 × 105) were seeded in 6-cm dishes 1 day before transfection with 3 μg plasmid pGL3-EPO-HRE-SV40-LUC, which harbors 3 copies of the erythropoietin hypoxia responsive element in front of the SV 40 promoter or a VEGF reporter plasmid (pGL3-1.5kbVEGFprom, obtained from Prof Maity, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia), for 8 hours, using dioleoyl-1,2-diacyl-3-trimethylammonium-propane (DOTAP) for transfection according to company instructions. Thereafter, medium was changed and cells were stimulated.

RT-PCR

MM6 cells (5 × 106) were incubated with or without 200 μg/mL oxLDL for 5 hours. Total RNA was isolated using the peqGOLD RNAPure kit, followed by HIF-1α mRNA reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Primer selection was as follows: HIF-1α,5′-CTCAAAGTCGGACAGCCTCA-3′,5′-CCCTGCAGTAGGTTTCTGCT-3′; actin, 5′-TGACGGGGTCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTA-3′, 5′-CTAGAAGCATTTGCGGTCGACGATGGAGGG-3′. Amplification program was as follows: 95°C, 30 seconds; 56°C, 30 seconds; 72°C, 1 minute; 20 cycles; 72°C, 10 minutes. Products were separated on 2% agarose gels and visualized with ethidium bromide.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was performed at least 3 times, and representative data are shown. Data are presented as means ± SD. The unpaired Student t test was used to evaluate the significance of differences between groups, accepting P < .05 as the level of significance.

To examine the effect of oxLDL on HIF-1α accumulation, MM6 cells were treated with oxLDL or nLDL. As shown in Figure 1A, oxLDL dose-dependently (25-200 μg/mL) induced HIF-1α accumulation. oxLDL was obtained by the CuSO4/EDTA oxidation protocol. Therefore, we ruled out that neither CuSO4 nor EDTA at the relevant concentrations promoted HIF-1α accumulation (Figure 1A). As a positive control, to unequivocally localize HIF-1α, we used an RCC4 protein lysate with constitutive HIF-1α expression (Figure 1A). Furthermore, we established that oxLDL but not nLDL, induced HIF-1α accumulation (Figure 1B). The most efficient response was noticed between 4 and 8 hours. Under these experimental conditions oxLDL was nontoxic (data not shown).

Figure 1.

HIF-1α accumulation in response to oxLDL. (A) MM6 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of oxLDL for 8 hours. For control reasons, 2 μM CuSO4, 15 μM EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and a lysate of RCC4 cells were processed in parallel. (B) MM6 cells were time-dependently stimulated with 200 μg/mL oxLDL or nLDL. (C) MM6 cells were pretreated with 3 mM NAC, 30 μM DPI, and 1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF) for 2 hours, followed by stimulation with 200 μg/mL oxLDL for 8 hours. S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO; 1 mM) was supplied together with oxLDL for 8 hours. (D) Cells were pretreated with 30 μM PD98059 or 30 μM SB203580 for 2 hours, following by stimulation with 200 μM oxLDL for 8 hours. (E) HIF-1α expression was induced by exposing MM6 cells to 200 μg/mL oxLDL for 8 hours. Cycloheximide (CHX) at a final concentration of 10 μg/mL was added for the times indicated (15-60 minutes). (F) Cells were treated with 200 μg/mL oxLDL for 5 hours, and HIF-1α mRNA was followed by RT-PCR analysis as described. All experiments were performed at least 3 times and representative data are shown. HIF-1α protein was detected by Western blot analysis as outlined in “Study design.”

Figure 1.

HIF-1α accumulation in response to oxLDL. (A) MM6 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of oxLDL for 8 hours. For control reasons, 2 μM CuSO4, 15 μM EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and a lysate of RCC4 cells were processed in parallel. (B) MM6 cells were time-dependently stimulated with 200 μg/mL oxLDL or nLDL. (C) MM6 cells were pretreated with 3 mM NAC, 30 μM DPI, and 1 mM 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF) for 2 hours, followed by stimulation with 200 μg/mL oxLDL for 8 hours. S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO; 1 mM) was supplied together with oxLDL for 8 hours. (D) Cells were pretreated with 30 μM PD98059 or 30 μM SB203580 for 2 hours, following by stimulation with 200 μM oxLDL for 8 hours. (E) HIF-1α expression was induced by exposing MM6 cells to 200 μg/mL oxLDL for 8 hours. Cycloheximide (CHX) at a final concentration of 10 μg/mL was added for the times indicated (15-60 minutes). (F) Cells were treated with 200 μg/mL oxLDL for 5 hours, and HIF-1α mRNA was followed by RT-PCR analysis as described. All experiments were performed at least 3 times and representative data are shown. HIF-1α protein was detected by Western blot analysis as outlined in “Study design.”

Close modal

Reports from several groups suggested that ROS stabilizes HIF-1α and activates HIF-1.8-10  Therefore, we investigated whether ROS, produced in response to oxLDL, contributed to HIF-1α accumulation (Figure 1C). N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) is an antioxidant, known to decrease ROS. The addition of 3 mM NAC to MM6 cells for 2 hours prior to the stimulation with 200 μg/mL oxLDL for 8 hours completely blocked HIF-1α accumulation. DPI inhibits oxLDL-mediated ROS formation in macrophages by blocking NADPH oxidase.2  When cells were pretreated with 30 μM DPI for 2 hours prior to oxLDL stimulation, HIF-1α accumulation was suppressed. Because DPI may inhibit mitochondrial complex I, we studied the effect of the structurally unrelated NADPH oxidase inhibitor AEBSF in parallel, which again prevented HIF-1α accumulation. The effect of nitric oxide (NO) derived from the most physiologic donor GSNO may be rationalized by the diffusion controlled interaction of

\(\mathrm{O}_{2}^{-}\)
with NO, thus allowing NO to attenuate HIF-1α accumulation. Our experiments with NADPH oxidase inhibitors (DPI, AEBSF) and GSNO suggest that
\(\mathrm{O}_{2}^{-}\)
might play a role in oxLDL-induced HIF-1α accumulation. Previously, it was demonstrated that mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family members such as p38 or ERK1/2 attenuated transactivation of HIF-1α in hypoxic cells. In MM6 cells, neither p38 (SB203580) nor ERK (PD98059) inhibitors affect oxLDL-induced HIF-1α accumulation (Figure 1D). Both inhibitors did not significantly alter HIF-1 transactivation in response to oxLDL (data not shown). Next, we examined the time-dependent disappearance of HIF-1α in the presence of the translational inhibitor cycloheximide (Figure 1E). Cells were treated with oxLDL for 4 hours followed by the subsequent addition of cycloheximide versus vehicle for 15 to 60 minutes. Cycloheximide decreased HIF-1α expression starting at 15 minutes, suggesting that oxLDL increased HIF-1α through a translational mechanism. The persistence of detectable HIF-1α protein 15 minutes following cycloheximide treatment could represent a delay in the onset of the cycloheximide effect but implies that the mode of action of oxLDL leaves the degradative pathway largely intact. Thus, it appeared advised to examine HIF-1α mRNA expression. RT-PCR (Figure 1F) revealed that oxLDL left HIF-1α mRNA levels unaltered. We then tested the ability of oxLDL to activate a HIF-1–dependent luciferase reporter gene construct, containing 3 copies of a hypoxia-response element derived from the human erythropoietin gene.

Treatment of MM6 cells with oxLDL resulted in significant reporter gene activation that was largely abrogated by DPI (Figure 2A). nLDL showed no reporter signal, whereas hypoxia elicited a luciferase activity comparable to oxLDL. Similarly, treatment of cells with oxLDL led to an increase in VEGF promoter activity (Figure 2B). Our results are consistent with previous studies, showing a 2- to 3-fold increase in reporter activity by hypoxia14,15  and further studies reporting hypoxic VEGF production in macrophages.16  Atherosclerosis is a progressive disease and a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world. Therefore, our results on HIF-1α accumulation by oxLDL appear of clinical relevance. It is well established that HIF-1α plays a major role in VEGF expression and angiogenesis9  with the notion that VEGF mediates important alterations associated with atherogenesis and the angiogenic activity of macrophages.16  Recent findings suggest that neovascularization within atherosclerotic plaques is a sign of advanced atherosclerosis/restenosis.17  It is tempting to speculate that oxLDL-induced HIF-1α accumulation and VEGF up-regulation are important in these pathophysiologic settings. A series of molecules and molecular pathways emerged that contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of both atherosclerosis and cancer.18,19  HIF-1 may be added to that list, considering the important tumor angiogenic role of HIF-1α. Our observations propose a new signaling quality of oxLDL in HIF-1 accumulation and demonstrate ROS involvement. This appears of considerable importance to fully understand progression of atherosclerosis and remodeling of the arterial wall by oxLDL.

Figure 2.

HIF-1–dependent reporter gene activation by oxLDL. MM6 cells were transiently transfected with a luciferase reporter gene construct, containing (A) 3 copies of the HRE of the erythropoietin gene (pGL3-EPO-HRE-SV40-LUC) or (B) pGL3-1.5kbVEGFprom. Transfected cells were stimulated for 8 hours with 200 μg/mL oxLDL or nLDL, in the absence or presence of 30 μM DPI, or exposed for 8 hours to hypoxia (1% oxygen) followed by luciferase activity determination. Luciferase activity is expressed relative to controls set as 100%. Values represent the fold induction of 4 independent experiments.

Figure 2.

HIF-1–dependent reporter gene activation by oxLDL. MM6 cells were transiently transfected with a luciferase reporter gene construct, containing (A) 3 copies of the HRE of the erythropoietin gene (pGL3-EPO-HRE-SV40-LUC) or (B) pGL3-1.5kbVEGFprom. Transfected cells were stimulated for 8 hours with 200 μg/mL oxLDL or nLDL, in the absence or presence of 30 μM DPI, or exposed for 8 hours to hypoxia (1% oxygen) followed by luciferase activity determination. Luciferase activity is expressed relative to controls set as 100%. Values represent the fold induction of 4 independent experiments.

Close modal

Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, February 13, 2003; DOI 10.1182/blood-2002-09-2711.

Supported by funds of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (BR 999), European Commission (EC) (QLK 6-GT-2000-64), and VerUm Foundation. V.A.S. is a research fellow of the Alexander von Humbolt Foundation.

V.A.S. and V.V.S. contributed equally to this study.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

1
Steinberg D. Low density lipoprotein oxidation and its pathobiological significance.
J Biol Chem
.
1997
;
272
:
20963
-20966.
2
Fischer B, von Knethen A, Brüne B. Dualism of oxidized lipoproteins in provoking and attenuating the oxidative burst in macrophages: role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma.
J Immunol
.
2002
;
168
:
2828
-2834.
3
Wang GL, Semenza GL. Purification and characterization of hypoxia-inducible factor 1.
J Biol Chem
.
1995
;
270
:
1230
-1237.
4
Salceda S, Caro J. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) protein is rapidly degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system under normoxic conditions. Its stabilization by hypoxia depends on redox-induced changes.
J Biol Chem
.
1997
;
272
:
22642
-22647.
5
Huang LE, Gu J, Schau M, Bunn HF. Regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha is mediated by an O2-dependent degradation domain via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
.
1998
;
95
:
7987
-7992.
6
Hellwig-Burgel T, Rutkowski K, Metzen E, Fandrey J, Jelkmann W. Interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α stimulate DNA binding of hypoxia-inducible factor-1.
Blood
.
1999
;
94
:
1561
-1567.
7
Faquin WC, Schneider TJ, Goldberg MA. Effect of inflammatory cytokines on hypoxia-induced erythropoietin production.
Blood
.
1992
;
79
:
1987
-1994.
8
Chandel NS, McClintock DS, Feliciano CE, et al. Reactive oxygen species generated at mitochondrial complex III stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor-1α during hypoxia. A mechanism of O2 sensing.
J Biol Chem
.
2000
;
275
:
25130
-25138.
9
Richard DE, Berra E, Pouyssegur J. Nonhypoxic pathway mediates the induction of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in vascular smooth muscle cells.
J Biol Chem
.
2001
;
275
:
26765
-26771.
10
Brauchle M, Funk JO, Kind P, Werner S. Ultraviolet B and H2O2 are potent inducers of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in cultured keratinocytes.
J Biol Chem
.
1996
;
271
:
21793
-21797.
11
Haddad JJ, Land SC. A non-hypoxic, ROS-sensitive pathway mediates TNF-alpha-dependent regulation of HIF-1alpha.
FEBS Lett
.
2001
;
505
:
269
-274.
12
Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang G-W, et al. The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis.
Nature
.
1999
;
399
:
271
-275.
13
Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maxwell PH, Harris AL, Ratcliffe PJ. Identification of novel hypoxia dependent and independent target genes of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tumour suppressor by mRNA differential expression profiling.
Oncogene
.
2000
;
19
:
6297
-6305.
14
Sandau KB, Zhou J, Kietzmann T, Brüne B. Regulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha by the inflammatory mediators nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in contrast to desferroxamine and phenylarsine oxide.
J Biol Chem
.
2001
;
276
:
39805
-39811.
15
Maity A, Pore N, Lee J, Solomon D, O'Rourke DM. Epidermal growth factor receptor transcriptionally up-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human glioblastoma cells via a pathway involving phosphatidylinositol 3′ kinase and distinct from that induced by hypoxia.
Cancer Res
.
2000
;
60
:
5879
-5886.
16
Xiong M, Elson G, Legarda D, Leibovich SJ. Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by murine macrophages: regulation by hypoxia, lactate, and the inducible nitric oxide synthase pathway.
Am J Pathol
.
1998
;
153
:
587
-598.
17
Laukkanen J, Ylä-Herttuala S. Genes involved in atherosclerosis.
Exp Nephrol
.
2002
;
10
:
150
-163.
18
Ross JS, Stagliano NE, Donovan MJ, Breitbart RE, Ginsburg GS. Atherosclerosis and cancer: common molecular pathways of disease development and progression.
Ann N Y Acad Sci
.
2001
;
947
:
271
-293.
19
Toi M. Bando H, Ogawa T, Muta M, Hornig C, Weich HA. Significance of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/soluble VEGF receptor-1 relationship in breast cancer.
Int J Cancer
.
2002
;
98
:
14
-18.
Sign in via your Institution