Abstract
Despite improvements in therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), a significant percentage of patients still relapse and succumb to their disease. Dendritic cell immunotherapy offers the promise of potentially effective supportive therapy for a variety of neoplastic conditions; and the use of DCs loaded with tumor antigens is now recognized as an important investigational therapy. Though a variety of methods have been used to load DC vaccines, the loading of the MHC class II compartment with tumor lysate has predominated. The priming of a class II-mediated (CD4) T-cell response may be crucial to the success of DC immunotherapy as such a response is likely required for the development of memory CD8+ T-cells. DC cross-presentation is credited with the ability of lysate-loaded DCs to prime both CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses, enabling the generation of CD8+ CTLs without the loading of the MHC class I compartment (i.e. the cytoplasm). Recently, however, several reports have raised doubts as to the efficiency of cross-presentation as a mechanism for CTL priming in vivo. To examine this issue, we have loaded human DCs with both AML tumor lysate and mRNA. This technique allows the full repertoire of class I antigens to be presented without dependence upon cross-presentation; and, moreover, provides a full complement of class II antigens necessary for CD4 T-cell priming and the generation of memory responses.
Methods: CD14+ precursors were isolated from normal donor PBPCs by magnetic separation. Immature DCs were then generated by culturing precursors for six days in GM-CSF and IL-4. Lysate was produced by three successive freeze/thaw cycles of blasts. mRNA was extracted from blasts using Trizol and oligo-dT separation. Immature DCs were pulsed for three hours with AML lysate and subsequently electroporated with AML mRNA. Loaded DCs were matured for 48 hours with IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, and PGE2 and then used to prime autologous T-cells. Short-term responses were assayed on day 5 of the 1st stimulation. Memory responses were assayed on day 10 of a tertiary stimulation.
Results: Doubly-loaded DCs can prime a superior T-cell response in vitro in comparison to that of singly-loaded DCs, demonstrating a 30–70% increase in IFN-γ ELISpots over lysate-loaded DCs (p<0.001) and a 3–4 fold increase in ELISpots in comparison to mRNA loaded DCs (p<0.001). These results were verified by flow cytometry which showed 35% of CD8+ T-cells primed by doubly-loaded DCs were CD69+/IFN-γ+ vs. 14% of CD8+ T-cells primed by lysate-loaded DCs (p<0.001). This enhancement may be based upon both an upregulation of CD83 surface expression (p<0.0019) of doubly-loaded DCs and/or the upregulation of B7.1/B7.2 that accompanies elevated CD40L signaling. Memory responses were also greatly improved, with a 126% increase in total ELISpots (double loaded DCs versus lysate loaded DCs; p<0.03) and a 187% increase in total IFN-γ secretion (p<0.03). Unloaded (p<0.01) and mRNA (p<0.007) loaded DCs exhibited a virtual inability to generate memory T-cells in vitro, suggesting that the perpetuation of the memory response is reliant upon T-cell help.
Conclusion: DCs doubly-loaded with lysate and mRNA are more efficient in the generation of primary and secondary immune responses than are singly-loaded DCs. The clinical administration of such doubly-loaded DCs may offer an important therapeutic option to patients with AML.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal