Abstract
In mucopolysaccharidosis-I (MPS-I), α-L-iduronidase deficiency leads to progressive heparan sulfate (HS) and dermatan sulfate (DS) glycosaminoglycan (GAG) accumulation. The functional consequences of these accumulated molecules are unknown. HS critically influences tissue morphogenesis by binding to and modulating the activity of several cytokines (eg, fibroblast growth factors [FGFs]) involved in developmental patterning. We recently isolated a multipotent progenitor cell from postnatal human bone marrow, which differentiates into cells of all 3 embryonic lineages. The availability of multipotent progenitor cells from healthy volunteers and patients with MPS-I (Hurler syndrome) provides a unique opportunity to directly examine the functional effects of abnormal HS on cytokine-mediated stem-cell proliferation and survival. We demonstrate here that abnormally sulfated HS in Hurler multipotent progenitor cells perturb critical FGF-2–FGFR1-HS interactions, resulting in defective FGF-2–induced proliferation and survival of Hurler multipotent progenitor cells. Both the mitogenic and survival-promoting activities of FGF-2 were restored by substitution of Hurler HS by normal HS. This perturbation of critical HS–cytokine receptor interactions may represent a mechanism by which accumulated HS contributes to the developmental pathophysiology of Hurler syndrome. Similar mechanisms may operate in the pathogenesis of other diseases where structurally abnormal GAGs accumulate.
Introduction
Hurler syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis [MPS] type I) is an inborn error of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) metabolism caused by deficiency of α-L-iduronidase required for heparan sulfate (HS) and dermatan sulfate (DS) degradation.1-3 HS and DS accumulation leads to cell and organ dysfunction. While progressive neuropsychologic dysfunction is a hallmark of Hurler and related storage diseases,4 its cellular and molecular mechanisms remain undefined.
The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) cytokine family affects cell growth, migration, differentiation, and neuroectodermal development.5 FGF-2, a prototypical member involved in tissue morphogenesis and neurogenesis,6 has 2 kinds of cell-surface receptors. Specific, high-affinity FGF receptors (FGFRs) possessing intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity mediate cellular responses, while low-affinity receptors composed of HS proteoglycans (HSPGs) act as extracellular FGF-2 reservoirs and coreceptors.7 Although its mechanism of formation is unclear, the FGF-2–FGFR-HSPG complex is necessary for mitogenesis and optimal biologic response to FGF-2.8,9
Cell-type–specific and developmentally regulated HSPG synthesis regulates cell growth and differentiation by modulating extracellular signaling molecule activity.10-12 Specificity of interactions between HSPG and signaling molecules depends on HSPG sequence, location, and 3-dimensional structure.11,13 The importance of HSPG in FGF signaling is underscored by their role in neurogenesis, axonal guidance, and synapse formation.12,14 FGF-2 also protects neurons against apoptosis and promotes neuronal survival.15
While GAGs synthesized by cultured Hurler fibroblasts are thought to be structurally normal,16 GAGs that accumulate in a tissue-specific manner17 consist of a combination of large, normally sized GAGs and partially degraded, smaller chains (oligosaccharides).18,19 How accumulated oligosaccharides cause abnormal tissue development and function remains uncertain. Our previous studies on normal hematopoiesis suggest that a high concentration of small, abnormally sulfated HS chains (such as may be present in Hurler syndrome) are detrimental to orderly stem-cell growth and differentiation.20-22 We hypothesize that abnormal size and sulfation of accumulated HS oligosaccharides leads to aberrant functional properties of HS, including their capability to modulate GAG-binding cytokine activity, which may contribute to Hurler syndrome pathophysiology.
Clinically, following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell (HSC) transplantation, donor-derived tissue macrophages secrete α-L-iduronidase, which ameliorates clinical manifestations of Hurler syndrome and prolongs life.23-25 However, the hematopoietic system itself is not affected in Hurler syndrome. In vitro, a major limitation to examining the pathophysiologic role of HS remains the inability to obtain primary cells representative of diverse nonhematopoietic tissues such as the brain and skeletal system that are particularly affected in Hurler syndrome and not optimally corrected by HSC transplantation. We recently identified a multipotent, nonhematopoietic stem cell in postnatal human and rodent bone marrow (multipotent adult progenitor cell [MAPC])26,27 that now provides a powerful model for studying the effect of HS on cytokine signaling and nonhematopoietic stem-cell growth and differentiation. For the current studies, we used MAPCs rather than HSCs since (1) MAPCs expand without senescence, yet can be induced to differentiate into multiple mesodermal, endodermal, and ectodermal lineages26-30 ; (2) MAPCs acquire neural and glial phenotypes when cultured with FGF-231 ; (3) MAPCs represent an in vitro model for defining the effect of abnormal HS on progenitors of nonhematopoietic tissues affected by Hurler syndrome; and (4) transplantation of nonhematopoietic progenitor/stem cells is being tested as a therapeutic modality for Hurler syndrome.32 We examined if FGF-2–FGFR-HS interactions are abnormal in Hurler syndrome, and if this affects MAPC proliferation and survival.
We demonstrate that Hurler MAPC HSs are small and abnormally sulfated and have an impaired capability to induce FGF-2 binding to receptor FGFR1 and to mediate its biologic activity. The presence of normal HS or normal MAPCs corrects these abnormalities. These studies identify a mechanism by which accumulated HS may contribute to the developmental pathophysiology of Hurler syndrome by impairing critical HS–cytokine receptor interactions.
Materials and methods
Isolation and in vitro expansion of human MAPCs
The University of Minnesota Human Subjects Committee approved these studies. Informed consent was provided in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. MAPCs selected from normal bone marrow (BM) were expanded in culture as described.26,29 Briefly, BM mononuclear cells obtained by Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient centrifugation were depleted of CD45- and glycophorin-A (GlyA)–expressing cells using micromagnetic beads (Miltenyi Biotec, Sunnyvale, CA). CD45-/GlyA- cells were plated at 5000 cells/well in 96-well plates coated with 5 ng/mL fibronectin (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ) in MAPC medium containing 54% low-glucose DMEM (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), 40% MCDB-201 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), 2% fetal calf serum (FCS; Hyclone Laboratories, Logan, UT), 1x insulin-transferrin-selenium, 1x linoleic acid–bovine serum albumin (BSA), 5 × 10-8 M dexamethasone, 10-4 M ascorbic acid 2-phosphate (all from Sigma), 1x penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen), 10 ng/mL epidermal growth factor (EGF; Sigma), and 10 ng/mL platelet-derived growth factor–BB (PDGF-BB; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Medium was changed every 4 to 5 days. Cells were replated in larger fibronectin-coated vessels to maintain a density of 1500 to 2000 cells/cm2. All cultures were incubated at 37°C in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Hurler MAPCs were similarly selected and expanded from a BM aliquot taken from patients with Hurler syndrome undergoing autologous BM harvesting prior to HSC transplantation. We confirmed that functional α-L-iduronidase enzyme activity was present in normal MAPCs but not in Hurler MAPCs (data not shown). Sera used for all studies in this paper were heat-inactivated (2 hours at 55°C) to inactivate bovine α-L-iduronidase.33
Metabolic labeling and purification of proteoglycans and HS
MAPCs grown to 80% confluence in MAPC medium were irradiated to 1600 rads. After 1 week, medium was changed to labeling medium (Ham F-12 Medium [Gibco BRL] plus 5% FCS and 10-6 M hydrocortisone) for 2 hours. Proteoglycans were metabolically labeled by adding 2.59 MBq (70 μCi)/mL to 2.77 MBq (75 μCi)/mL Na235SO4 (to label sulfate groups) and 740 KBq (20 μCi)/mL 3H-glucosamine (to label glucosamine monosaccharides in the polysaccharide backbone) in fresh Ham F-12 for 24 hours. After collecting supernatants, cell-surface plus extracellular matrix (ECM) PGs were obtained by treating cell layers with trypsin/EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and intracellular PGs obtained by lysing cell pellets with 1% Triton X-100. Samples were dialyzed extensively, and proteoglycans enriched by diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)–Sephacel anion exchange HPLC (Beckman, CA), as described.20,21 Each proteoglycan peak resolved on HPLC was separately processed to purify HS for further analysis. To remove residual proteins, nucleic acids, and CS/DS GAGs, proteoglycans from each peak were sequentially digested with proteinase K (Sigma), chondroitinase ABC (Seikagaku America, Falmouth, MA), DNAse (Sigma), and RNAse (Sigma). HS chains were released from core proteins by alkaline sodium borohydride (NaBH4).21 Purified HS chains were separated from proteins, peptides, and mono- and disaccharides using Sephadex G-50 gel filtration chromatography followed by repeat anion exchange HPLC. Purity of HS preparations was consistently more than 95%, as determined by deaminative cleavage using low pH nitrous acid followed by Sephadex G50 gel filtration chromatography. HS purified from each HPLC peak was analyzed separately.
Size distribution of HS
The size of HS was estimated by gel filtration chromatography on a 0.75 × 95 cm Sepharose CL-6B column equilibrated in 4 M guanidine hydrochloride and 0.05 M sodium acetate, pH 5.8. The column was eluted at 3 mL/hour, and 500-μL fractions were collected. The approximate size (Mr) of HS was estimated by the method of Wasteson,34 as previously described.21
Preparation and HPLC analysis of HS disaccharides
The disaccharide composition of HS in normal and Hurler MAPCs was determined as recently described by us.35 A major advantage of this method is that it can be used to study HS from small numbers of cultured cells.
Samples of at least 3 × 106 cells were washed in PBS, scraped from the flasks, pelleted, and resuspended in 0.5 mL 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8, 1 mM CaCl2, 1% Triton X-100, and sonicated 3 times for 30 seconds at 3 W to 4 W before protein estimation (Pierce BCA Assay). They were digested with 0.8 mg/mL protease for 16 hours at 55°C, heat inactivated at 96°C for 5 minutes, then incubated for 2 hours at 37°C with 1 μL 1 M MgCl2 and 0.5 μL (168.5 U) benzonase. NaCl (0.1 M) was added and insoluble material removed by microcentrifugation. The solution was applied on an Ultrafree-MC DEAE membrane equilibrated with sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) containing 0.15 M NaCl. Fractions were eluted with 1.0 M NaCl in the same buffer, desalted with Biomax-5, lyophilized, and resuspended in 15 μL 0.03 M acetate buffer (pH 7.0) with 3.33 mM calcium acetate, 0.33 mIU heparinase, 0.33 mIU heparitinase II, and 0.33 mIU heparitinase I. The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 16 hours, lyophilized, and resuspended in 12 μL water to load onto the HPLC. HPLC conditions were as in Toyoda et al.35 Normal and Hurler HSs each comprised 6 major disaccharide types, assigned according to the elution positions of HS disaccharide standards. The disaccharide composition of each HS type was determined from the area under the peaks.
Binding of 125I-FGF2 to FGFR1 in presence of cell-surface HS
Heterodimerization of 125I-FGF-2 to cell-surface FGFR1 in the presence of normal or Hurler HS (formation of the FGF-2–FGFR1-HS complex) was determined as previously described.36 Normal and Hurler MAPCs were grown in 6-well plates until 80% confluent. After washing twice with serum-free, low sulfate Ham F-12 medium without penicillin/streptomycin, cells were incubated for 2 hours at 4°C with or without 25 ng/mL 125I-FGF2 (Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA), washed twice with PBS, then incubated with or without 0.25 mM disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature (to cross-link the 125I-FGF–2-FGFR1 complex), and lysed with 100 μL lysis buffer. Proteins in the lysate were separated by 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membrane was first autoradiographed on a Kodak film to visualize 125I-FGF2, then immunoblotted with an anti-FGFR1 polyclonal antibody (flg [H-76], cat no. SC-7945, Santa Cruz; 1:500 dilution). FGFR1 was detected using ECF (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). Densitometric analysis was performed using NIH Image 1.60b7. Equivalent loading of all lanes was confirmed by reprobing the membrane for β-actin (cat no. SC-1616, Santa Cruz; 1:1000 dilution; not shown).
Binding of 125I-FGF-2 to normal and Hurler MAPCs
Normal and Hurler MAPCs were seeded at 105 cells/well in 24-well plates. After overnight adherence, cells were placed on ice for 5 minutes, then washed twice with binding buffer (low sulfate Ham F-12 medium plus 0.1% BSA) and blocked with 3% BSA in Ham F-12 for 30 minutes at room temperature. Then 62.5 pM (2 × 105 cpm) 125I-FGF-2 (specific activity, 87.5 μCi/μg) was added in 500 μL binding buffer and plates incubated at 4°C for 2 hours on a rotary shaker. Cells were washed thrice with binding buffer and then 4 times with 2 M NaCl at pH 7.4, to remove nonspecifically bound 125I-FGF-2.7 Specifically bound 125I-FGF-2 was quantified by washing the cells with 2 M NaCl at low pH (4.0) twice and counting radioactivity released in the washes on a γ-counter.7
To examine the effect of MAPC conditioned medium (CM) on 125I-FGF-2 binding, the binding buffer was incubated with normal or Hurler MAPCs for 24 hours. This CM was then used at 50% concentration in some wells during the 125I-FGF-2 binding step (normal CM on Hurler MAPCs, and Hurler CM on normal MAPCs).
For removal of cell-surface and ECM HS prior to the binding assay, cells were plated in nonfibronectin-coated wells in MAPC medium, allowed to adhere overnight, then washed with heparitinase buffer (50 mM Hepes, 50 mM sodium acetate, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% BSA, pH 6.58) 3 times and digested with 0.4 μU/mL heparitinase I (EC 4.2.2.8; ICN Biomedicals, Aurora, OH) at 37°C for 1 hour in the same buffer with 10 μM CaCl2. Heparitinase III (EC 4.2.2.7; Seikagaku America) was then added at the same concentration and calcium increased to 1 mM. After 1 hour incubation, the cell layer was washed and the 125I-FGF-2 binding assay performed as described above in this section.
MAPC-cell proliferation assay
Normal or Hurler MAPCs were seeded (3000 cells/well) in 96-well plates in MAPC medium without EGF and PDGF. Different concentrations of FGF-2 were added to each well. Cells were cultured for 24 hours at 37°C, then CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution (Promega, Madison, WI) was added to quantify relative cell numbers. To examine the effect of Hurler CM, normal MAPCs were also cultured in presence of 50% Hurler MAPC CM and identical concentrations of FGF-2.
In parallel experiments, normal and Hurler MAPCs were depleted of cell-surface and ECM HS using heparitinases I and III (as described above, under “Binding of 125I-FGF-2 to normal and Hurler MAPCs”). The proliferation assay was then performed in the absence or presence of normal or Hurler MAPC CM (as a source of normal or Hurler HS). During the proliferation assay, the medium was supplemented with 0.1 μU/mL each of heparitinases I and III.
MAPC apoptosis assay
Hurler MAPCs were plated onto fibronectin-coated sterile coverslips placed in 6-well plates in MAPC medium. Separately, Hurler or normal MAPCs were plated onto fibronectin-coated microporous membranes of Transwell inserts, which were then placed in wells containing Hurler MAPCs on coverslips in the bottom chamber. The entire medium in the wells was changed to serum-free MAPC media (without EGF or PDGF-BB) and containing 100 ng/mL FGF-2 and 1% BSA. After 1 to 7 days, the coverslips (with Hurler MAPCs) were removed and examined for cell morphology and apoptosis.
Apoptosis was detected with the Annexin V-Cy3 Apoptosis Detection Kit (Sigma), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Annexin-Cy3.18 (AnnCy3; red) binds to the outer leaflet of apoptotic and dead cells, while 6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate (6-CFDA) is converted to fluorescent 6-CF (green) only in living cells. Thus, live cells appear green, cells in early apoptosis label with both AnnCy3 (red) and 6-CF (green) producing a yellow color on merged images, while dead cells label only with AnnCy3 (red) but not with 6-CF (green) since they cannot convert 6-CFDA to 6-CF, and thus appear red. The numbers of live, apoptotic, and dead cells were calculated by counting 100 to 250 cells in 4 to 8 fields photographed from different coverslips.
FGF-2 induced proliferation of F32 cells on fixed MAPCs
F32 cells (a kind gift from Dr Alan Rapraeger, University of Wisconsin) are FGFR1 transfected lymphoid cells that express no endogenous cell-surface HSPG, and therefore require exogenous HS/heparin to bind FGF-2 to FGFR1 and stimulate cell proliferation.9,37 To prepare a fixed MAPC layer, 5000 MAPCs/well were allowed to adhere as a confluent monolayer in 96-well flat-bottom plates for 24 hours at 37°C in MAPC medium, fixed for 1 hour in 0.5% glutaradehyde in PBS at room temperature followed by 3 washes in PBS containing 0.2 M glycine, then incubated overnight in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS, 4 mM l-glutamine, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. To examine the effect of cell-surface plus ECM HS of normal and Hurler MAPCs on FGF-2–induced F32-cell proliferation, F32 cells were seeded on fixed MAPC monolayers at 105 cells/mL in cytokine- and serum-deficient medium (RPMI with 0.1% BSA, 4 mM l-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin). Various concentrations of FGF-2 were added and plates incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution was added to quantify the relative number of cells in each well, as a measure of cell proliferation.
For assessment of proliferation of F32 cells on MAPCs depleted of cell-surface and ECM HS, the fixed normal and Hurler MAPCs in selected wells were pretreated with heparitinases I and III (as described above, under “Binding of 125I-FGF-2 to normal and Hurler MAPCs”).
Results
Structure of HS from normal and Hurler MAPCs
Anion-exchange HPLC profile. Proteoglycans deposited in the ECM plus cell surface, and those present in intracellular storage sites, were separately examined. Proteoglycans from Hurler MAPCs were markedly abnormal. On anion-exchange HPLC, there was an early eluting PG peak in both the ECM and intracellular pools from Hurler cells. This abnormally large peak (peak no. 1), comprised 60% of the total intracellular PGs in Hurler MAPCs, versus 19% in normal MAPCs (Figure 1). This peak comprised 6% of the PGs in the ECM of Hurler MAPCs, but was completely absent in the ECM of normal MAPCs. HSs were obtained separately from each of the various HPLC-resolved peaks and analyzed as follows.
Size distribution of HS. HS in the abnormal peak no. 1 of the intracellular pool of Hurler MAPCs was largely comprised of small oligosaccharides (Mr 5.5 kDa; Figure 2). Similarly, peak no. 1 of the ECM of Hurler MAPCs was comprised mostly of small- (Mr 5.5 kDa) and intermediate-sized (Mr 25 kDa) oligosaccharides. These data are consistent with accumulation of oligosaccharides whose complete degradation is blocked by lack of α-L-iduronidase in Hurler MAPCs. In contrast, intracellular HS in peak no. 1 from normal MAPCs were comprised of 3 groups of large (Mr 55 kDa), intermediate (Mr 25 kDa), and small (Mr 7 kDa) molecules. The size distribution of HS in peak no. 2 of the intracellular pool and the ECM (Figure 2) of Hurler MAPCs was comparable to that of normal MAPCs.
Disaccharide composition of normal and Hurler MAPC HS
The aggregate disaccharide composition of HS chains in Hurler MAPCs was consistently and significantly different from that of normal MAPCs (Figure 3). The total amount of HS (= 5 kDa) was greater in Hurler compared with normal MAPCs (2670 pg/μg vs 1554 pg/μg protein, respectively), a consequence of glycosaminoglycan accumulation in Hurler cells. A small proportion of less than 5 kDa HS was also isolated, with 4-fold higher levels of this in the Hurler MAPCs (not analyzed further). Normal and Hurler HS each comprised 6 major disaccharide types (Figure 3A-B) including 3 6-O-sulfated disaccharides, UAGlcNAc6S (peak no. 3), UAGlcNS6S (peak no. 4), and UA2SGlcNS6S (peak no. 6). The levels of all 3 6-O-sulfated disaccharides were reduced in Hurler (= 5 kDa) HS, with the greatest reduction (a 52% decrease) in UAGlcNS6S (Figure 3C). Overall there was a 26% decrease in 6-O-sulfation in Hurler MAPC (= 5 kDa) HS (P < .05; Figure 3D). In contrast, the proportion of UA2SGlcNS was slightly higher in Hurler MAPCs whereas the proportion of UAGlcNAc and UAGlcNS was equivalent in the 2 cell types (Figure 3B). The extent of reduction in 6-O-sulfated disaccharides was highly correlated with progressive accumulation of GAGs in MAPCs, most evident for UAGlcNS6S (correlation coefficient R = 0.99), which was reduced by 84% in Hurler MAPCs with the highest total accumulation of HS (Figure 3E). These data indicate that there are both quantitative as well as structural differences between Hurler and normal MAPC HS.
Binding of 125I-FGF2 to FGFR1 in presence of cell-surface HS
Both normal and Hurler MAPCs expressed FGFR1 (Figure 4A). However, the binding of 125I-FGF-2 to FGFR1 on Hurler MAPCs was less as compared with normal MAPCs (Figure 4B-C). Colocalization of FGFR1 and 125I-FGF-2, and the lack of the 125I-FGF-2 band in absence of cross-linking by DSS, indicate that the results represent specific ligand-receptor binding. These data suggest that the capability of Hurler HS to facilitate FGF-2 binding to FGFR1 (formation of the FGF-2–FGFR1-HS complex) is defective.
125I-FGF-2 binding to normal and Hurler MAPCs
Binding of 125I-FGF-2 to Hurler MAPCs was only 55% ± 3% of that compared with normal MAPCs (Figure 4D; P < .001). In presence of Hurler MAPC CM, binding of 125I-FGF-2 to normal MAPCs was reduced to 51% ± 4% of binding to normal MAPCs alone (P < .001). In contrast, 125I-FGF-2 binding to Hurler MAPCs was not improved by normal MAPC CM. Removal of cell-surface and ECM HS by heparitinase treatment further reduced 125I-FGF-2 binding to Hurler MAPCs (P < .001 compared with untreated cells). CM from normal MAPCs but not that from Hurler MAPCs (used as a source of HS) markedly improved binding to heparitinase-treated Hurler MAPCs (P < .001). Interestingly, binding of 125I-FGF-2 to heparitinase-treated Hurler MAPCs in presence of normal CM was significantly higher than binding to untreated Hurler MAPCs in the absence or presence of normal CM (P < .005 and P < .001 respectively). These data indicate that substances (likely HS) in the Hurler MAPC microenvironment interfere with FGF-2 binding to cell-surface receptors.
FGF-2 induced proliferation of MAPCs
To investigate the mitogenic response of normal and Hurler MAPCs to FGF-2, MAPCs were cultured with various concentrations of FGF-2 alone, in the absence of other cytokines. Normal MAPCs showed dose-dependent proliferation at lower concentrations of FGF-2, and inhibition of proliferation at higher concentrations (Figure 5A). In contrast, Hurler MAPCs failed to show either stimulation or inhibition of proliferation over the range of concentrations of FGF-2 tested. When normal MAPCs were cultured in presence of Hurler CM, their proliferative response was markedly inhibited in an FGF-2 dose-dependent manner.
To examine if the observed differences were due to HS, proliferation of heparitinase I– and III–treated normal (Figure 5B) and Hurler MAPCs (Figure 5C) depleted of cell-surface and ECM HS was examined in absence or presence of normal or Hurler CM (as a source of exogenous HS). Following heparitinase treatment, neither normal nor Hurler MAPCs could proliferate in response to FGF-2 (Figure 5B-C). The FGF-2 dose-dependent proliferation of both normal and Hurler MAPCs was restored by normal but not by Hurler CM. These results indicate that factors in the Hurler-cell microenvironment (likely HS) interfere with FGF-2 mitogenic signaling, and are in keeping with the effect of Hurler CM on FGF-2 binding.
Apoptosis of Hurler MAPCs
We examined if the defective biologic activity of FGF-2 on Hurler MAPCs would lead to their apoptosis when deprived of other cytokines and serum, and if the presence of normal MAPCs (separated from the Hurler MAPCs by a Transwell membrane) would prevent apoptosis. When cultured in standard MAPC medium, both normal and Hurler MAPCs remained alive (Figure 6Ai-ii). However, when cultured in serum-free medium containing FGF-2 as the only cytokine (Figure 6Aiii-iv), a larger proportion of Hurler MAPCs on coverslips in the lower chamber of the well became apoptotic or died by 5 days when Hurler MAPCs were present in the Transwell inserts above the coverslips than when normal MAPCs were present in the Transwell inserts (39% ± 7% vs 17% ± 2%, respectively; P < .05). This difference was mainly due to a larger proportion of apoptotic cells (29% ± 4% vs 12% ± 2%, respectively; P < .02; Figure 6B). These data indicate that the survival-promoting activity of FGF-2 on Hurler MAPCs is impaired, but can be restored following cross-correction by normal MAPCs across a microporous Transwell membrane.
The lower level of apoptosis at early time points (days 1-3) upon serum starvation (Figure 6B) might possibly be due to the fact that MAPCs represent a cell type that is initially selected on the basis of its ability to survive and grow in very low or no serum. Further, it is likely that the biologic activity of FGF-2 is reduced but not absent on Hurler MAPCs, as suggested by the binding studies, providing some protection from early apoptosis. As expected, by a later time point (day 7), the proportion of dead cells continued to increase, whereas the proportion of apoptotic cells declined.
FGF-2 induced proliferation of F32 cells on fixed MAPCs
We also directly examined the capability of normal and Hurler-MAPC–cell surface and ECM HS to mediate the biologic activity of FGF-2 on an independent, HS-deficient, FGFR1-expressing cell line. To establish controls, we confirmed that F32 cells cultured with FGF-2 in absence of exogenous HS/heparin failed to proliferate (Figure 7), but did proliferate actively when heparin was added to the medium (not shown). F32 cells cultured on fixed normal MAPCs (which served as a source of normal HS) showed dose-dependent proliferation with increasing concentrations of FGF-2 till 1000 pM. In contrast, FGF-2–induced F32 proliferation was lower when fixed Hurler MAPCs served as a source of HS. These differences in F32 proliferation on normal versus Hurler MAPCs were larger at lower FGF-2 concentrations (3 pM-30 pM). At intermediate FGF-2 concentrations (1000 pM), there was a trend toward lower proliferation on Hurler MAPCs. However, at the highest FGF-2 concentrations (3000 pM-30 000 pM), F32 proliferation on Hurler MAPCs became comparable to that on normal MAPCs. That the HS presented by normal and Hurler MAPCs was responsible for the observed differences in FGF-2–mediated F32 proliferation was confirmed by enzymatic removal of HS (using heparitinases I and III) from MAPCs prior to the proliferation assay.
Discussion
We demonstrate that structurally and functionally abnormal HSs that accumulate in Hurler syndrome perturb critical FGF-2–FGFR1-HS interactions. Further, FGF-2–induced proliferation and survival of Hurler MAPCs is defective. This may be one mechanism by which accumulated HSs contribute to the developmental pathophysiology of Hurler syndrome.
Previous studies on Hurler syndrome examined structural features of GAGs obtained from the urine, autopsy tissue homogenates, or cultured fibroblasts.16-18,33,38-40 Overall, our findings are consistent with these studies. A unique aspect of our study is that we examined metabolically radiolabeled GAGs obtained from the progeny of primary, multipotent stem-cell populations from the BM of patients with Hurler syndrome and healthy volunteers. This enabled examination of the structure and functional properties of HS deposited in the ECM/cell surface and which accumulated intracellularly, and the association between these abnormalities and the activity of an important GAG-binding cytokine.
6-O-sulfation of HS is required for mediating FGF-2–FGFR1-HS complex formation and FGF-2 activity.41,42 We found that reduction in 6-O-sulfation of Hurler HS is associated with impaired FGF-2–FGFR1-HS complex formation and FGF-2 activity on Hurler MAPCs.
There was progressive reduction in the disaccharide UAGlcNS6S with increasing total accumulation of HS in Hurler MAPCs. It is possible that this may at least partly be due to a feedback mechanism from accumulated GAGs that downregulates HS6ST enzymes at a transcriptional or translational level. It also leads us to speculate that the progressive postnatal GAG accumulation in the brain (2- to 4-fold higher than normal brain),43-46 which is comparable to that in Hurler MAPCs, may lead to progressive structural abnormalities in HS and functional abnormalities in the biologic activity of critical cytokines.
At the cellular level, Hurler MAPCs demonstrated reduced 125I-FGF-2 binding, not corrected by normal MAPC CM unless Hurler MAPCs were pretreated with heparitinase. This indicates that removal of abnormal HS from Hurler-MAPC–cell surface and ECM and provision of normal HS restores 125I-FGF-2 binding. That Hurler MAPC CM was unable to improve FGF-2 binding to heparitinase-treated Hurler MAPCs is further evidence that Hurler HS is functionally abnormal.
This impairment of FGF-2 binding to Hurler MAPCs was associated with defective mitogenic activity of FGF-2 (MAPC proliferation experiments). Abnormal HS in Hurler syndrome thus impairs the ability of primitive progenitors to respond to mitogenic signaling from developmentally important cytokines. These results also suggest a mechanism for the recent observation that proliferation of neural progenitors (which depends on FGF-2)47 is reduced in a mouse model of MPS IIIB, another disease where partially degraded HSs accumulate.48
FGF-2–mediated proliferation of independent, FGFR1-expressing, HS-dependent F32 cells seeded on Hurler MAPCs was lower than on normal MAPCs. Since MAPCs served as a source of HS for F32 cells, this further indicates that HS on Hurler-MAPC–cell surface and ECM is abnormal, and directly impairs the FGF-2 mitogenic signaling. In contrast to the complete lack of FGF-2–induced proliferation of Hurler MAPCs themselves, proliferation of F32 cells on fixed Hurler MAPCs still occurred. This may be a result of alteration HS-FGF-2–FGFR1 complex formation dynamics because of large numbers of FGFR1 receptors on F32 cells.
FGF-2, like other cytokines, protects target cells, including neurons, from apoptosis.15 We show that FGF-2–mediated protection of serum-starved MAPCs (which can differentiate into neuronal cells)26,27,31 from apoptosis is defective in Hurler syndrome.
Finally, we show that HS provided by normal MAPCs can correct the impairment of FGF-2 biologic activity, since removal of Hurler HS from MAPC surface and provision of normal HS in CM (1) improved 125I-FGF-2 binding to Hurler MAPCs, and (2) restored FGF-2–mediated Hurler MAPC proliferation. Also, the impaired capability of FGF-2 to prevent apoptosis of serum-starved Hurler MAPCs was restored by coculture with normal MAPCs.
It is possible that some of the observed abnormalities may be due to accumulated DS in Hurler MAPCs. However, specific enzymatic removal of cell-surface plus ECM HS and provision of normal HS (in normal MAPC CM) largely restored 125I-FGF-2 binding to and proliferation of Hurler MAPCs, indicating that abnormal HSs are mainly responsible for impairment of FGF-2 activity.
Our observation that progressive GAG accumulation is associated with a progressive decline in 6-O-sulfated disaccharides of HS, together with the known clinical behavior of Hurler syndrome where progressive GAG accumulation and neuropsychologic decline occurs postnatally, lead us to speculate that part of the pathophysiology of this disease may be related to progressive impairment of FGF-2 activity postnatally. This notion is consistent with normal prenatal brain development in Hurler syndrome, when GAG accumulation has not yet occurred, and therefore the biologic activity of FGF-2 may not be affected.
In conclusion, our studies suggest a potential mechanism by which accumulated GAGs contribute to the pathophysiology of Hurler syndrome via perturbation of cytokine activity, and how normal GAGs may correct these abnormalities. Similar mechanisms may possibly be involved in the pathogenesis of other neurodegenerative diseases associated with GAG accumulation.
Prepublished online as Blood First Edition Paper, June 9, 2005; DOI 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0657.
Supported by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (P.G.), NIH 1-R03-HD-41 411-01 and NIH 1-R01-NS-48 606-01 (P.G.), the Children's Cancer Research Fund (P.G., C.P.), and the University of Minnesota Medical School. C. Pan and S.E.S. designed and performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; M.S.N., J.J.B., and E.J.S. performed research and analyzed data; M.R. and L.K. isolated and cultured multipotent progenitor cells; R.Z. and S.B.S. designed research; C. Peters provided bone marrow samples and designed research; P.G. designed research, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.
We thank Dr Catherine M. Verfaillie, Director, Stem Cell Institute and Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, and Dr Theodore R. Oegema Jr, Professor and Chairman, Department of Biochemistry, Rush University, Chicago, IL, for their advice and help with this work.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal