Abstract
Follicular lymphoma is considered to be incurable disease, although rituximab introduction into the first line therapy has changed the outcome of the patients. Repeated relapses are observed and it is accepted, that each subsequent remission in the same patient has significantly shorter duration compared to the previous one (Gallagher, JCO 1986). We have addressed this question in the group of patients diagnosed and treated in the rituximab era. The interval 1999 till 2002 was chosen because in this time rituximab was already labeled for relapse treatment, but not for the first line treatment. Patients and method: Patients diagnosed as FL gr I, II, IIIa (central pathology review) and reported in the 6 centers during the period 1999–2002 were included into the analysis. The cohort consisted out of 176 pts. Median age at the 57.5 y(22–93), B symptoms were observed in 40 pts (2 missing), clinical stage (CS) I had 16 pts, II 32 pts, III 28 pts and IV 95 pts, PS WHO ≥ 2 in 25 pts(four missing), elevated LDH >n 60 pts (8 missing). FLIPI was estimated as poor risk in 52, intermediate risk in 46 and good risk in 66 pts. (13 missing). Median follow up is 7.5 years. Results: Ninety eight (55%) pts experienced 1st progression and 9 deaths without progression, 36 pts 2nd progression and 14 deaths w/o progression, 15 pts 3 rd progression and 6 death w/o progression and 9 pts 4th progression, therefore 176 were evaluable for 1st response, 98 pts were evaluable for duration of 2nd response, 36 for 3rd resp, 15 for 4th response. Median age was 57.5y at dg, 59y at 1st, 64y at 2nd, 66y at 3rd and 77y at 4th progression. The treatment data for the first line: 175 pts evaluable, 3 pts watch and wait (WW), anthracyclin based chemotherapy (A-th) 76%, fludarabine based chemotherapy (F-th) 5.2%, rituximab (R) 28.5%, radiotherapy (RT) 19.1%, ASCT 9.3%. 2nd line therapy: 93 pts available, WW 5pts, A-th 26%, F-th 13.6%, R 70.5%, RT 8.0%, ASCT 20.5%, AlloSCT 2.3%, 3rd line therapy: 35 pts evaluable, WW 3 pts, A-th 9.4%, F-th 28%, R 65.6%, RT 31.3%, ASCT and AlloSCT both 3.1%, 4th line therapy: 10 pts evaluable, WW 1 pt, A-th 1 pt, F-th 3 pts, R 7 pts, RT 3 pts. The significant increase in the relative number of rituximab treated pts in the subsequent treatment lines was observed. Median survival for the all pts PFS was 40 months, median OS not reached (79 month at 7 y). The medians of the time to progression (TTP) in subsequent responses (deaths w/o progression were excluded) were as follows: TTP1 49m, TTP2 43 m, TTP3 52m and TTP4 11m. There was no signifiant difference observed between TTP1, TTP2 and TTP3, but due the the very short TTP4 the overall significance was 0.05. Comparison of the PFS of subsequent lines revealed median PFS1 40 months, PFS2 30 months, PFS3 14 m and PFS4 11m. The difference between PFS1 and PFS2 was not significant, the subsequent PFS were significantly shorter for PFS3 and PFS 4 compared to the previous ones (p<0.05). Conclusion: The present analysis demonstrates that introduction of rituximab in the treatment of relapses led to the same TTP after 1st, 2nd or 3rd line of treatment, and the same PFS after the first and 2nd line therapy. The introduction of the efficient treatment modality - rituximab - into the relapse treatment has changed the concept, that each subsequent response have to have significantly shorter duration. This is important for understanding of natural history of the indolent disease such as follicular lymphoma. The reanalysis however needs to be done on the cohort of patients treated with rituximab as part of the first line treatment in the future with the sufficient follow up Supported by grant IGA MZ CR number NR/9453-3.
Disclosures: Trneny:Biogen IDEC: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Pytlik:Roche: Honoraria. Belada:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer - Schering-Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kubackova:Bayer-Schering-Pharma: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: travel grants; Roche: Research Funding; Wyeth: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: travel grants; Merck: travel grants. Papajik:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Bayer Schering: Honoraria.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal