Abstract
Allogeneic HSCT remains an important option for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) who failed imatinib. Focus has been on second line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Little is known on the outcome of HSCT for such patients. In July 2002, the German CML-Study Group activated a prospective randomized trial comparing different imatinib based strategies in chronic phase CML (CP). Elective early HSCT was considered for patients (pts) with EBMT score 0–1 for those with high disease risk, and after imatinib failure. By the end of July 2008, 1197 pts were randomized. In 80 (6,5 %) pts HSCT was documented. 52 pts were male (65%), 23 were high risk pts (28%) according to the Euro score. Median age at diagnosis was 37 years (yrs) (range 16–62), median time to HSCT was 12.6 months (mo, range 3.5–54 mo). EBMT score was 0–1 in 8 (10%), 2 in 10 (12%), 3–4 in 44 (55%) and 5 in 18 pts (23%). Median follow-up after HSCT was 19 mo (range 0–59). Cumulative response rates prior to HSCT were 68% for complete hematologic response, 23% for complete cytogenetic responses, and 9% for major molecular responses. Based on the indication for HSCT three groups were defined:
early HSCT (n= 19, 23%; low EBMT score (n=9), high risk pts (n=7), patient request (n=3);
HSCT after imatinib failure or intolerance in first CP (n=34, 43%) and
HSCT in second CP or higher, accelerated phase or blast crisis (n=27, 34%).
14 pts died, 10 deaths were transplantation related, 4 CML related. Two pts with a molecular relapse were successfully treated with donor lymphocyte infusion in combination with TKI. Overall survival rate at two yrs for group one was 87.8%, for group two 93.8%, and for group three 49.5%. By EBMT score, survival rates were 100% for risk score 0–2, 82.2% for risk score 3–4, and 43.5% for risk score 5. Data from this prospective controlled cohort study clearly show that HSCT remains an attractive and important rescue therapy for CML patients with imatinib failure or intolerance, particularly for those with a low EBMT risk score.
. | HSCT in 1st CP . | . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | early HSCT . | HSCT for failure and intolerance in 1st CP . | Total . | HSCT in advanced phases . | |
N | 19 | 34 | 53 | 27 | |
Euro score | high | 6 | 8 | 14 | 9 |
intermediate | 3 | 12 | 15 | 7 | |
low | 10 | 14 | 24 | 11 | |
% male | 63 | 56 | 60 | 78 | |
Median age (range) | 35 (16–56) | 38 (21–56) | 37 (16–56) | 37 (18–62) | |
Median time to HSCT (Range) (months) | 8.5 (4.8–23.6) | 17,5 (5.0– 53.7) | 12.6 (4.8 53.7) | 12.0 (3.5–54.1) | |
EBMT score | 0–1 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
2 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 1 | |
3–4 | 9 | 26 | 35 | 9 | |
>=5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | |
Best response | CHR | 11/18 | 28/34 | 39/52 | 14/26 |
CCyR | 3/17 | 10/33 | 13/50 | 4/22 | |
MMR | 2/17 | 3/31 | 5/48 | 2/19 | |
Response at HSCT | BC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
AP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
CP | 19 | 34 | 53 | 0 | |
HR | 11 | 19 | 30 | 0 | |
Ccyr | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | |
MMR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Transplant source | Sibling | 10 | 10 | 20 | 9 |
Unrelated | 9 | 24 | 33 | 18 | |
Conditioning therapy | standard | 14 | 21 | 35 | 17 |
reduced | 3 | 6 | 9 | 4 | |
other | 2 | 7 | 9 | 6 | |
Source | PB | 13 | 26 | 39 | 22 |
BM | 6 | 8 | 14 | 5 | |
Dead | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
TRM | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
CML | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
Probability of survival at 2 years after HSCT | 87.8% | 93.8% | 91.4% | 49.5% |
. | HSCT in 1st CP . | . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
. | early HSCT . | HSCT for failure and intolerance in 1st CP . | Total . | HSCT in advanced phases . | |
N | 19 | 34 | 53 | 27 | |
Euro score | high | 6 | 8 | 14 | 9 |
intermediate | 3 | 12 | 15 | 7 | |
low | 10 | 14 | 24 | 11 | |
% male | 63 | 56 | 60 | 78 | |
Median age (range) | 35 (16–56) | 38 (21–56) | 37 (16–56) | 37 (18–62) | |
Median time to HSCT (Range) (months) | 8.5 (4.8–23.6) | 17,5 (5.0– 53.7) | 12.6 (4.8 53.7) | 12.0 (3.5–54.1) | |
EBMT score | 0–1 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0 |
2 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 1 | |
3–4 | 9 | 26 | 35 | 9 | |
>=5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | |
Best response | CHR | 11/18 | 28/34 | 39/52 | 14/26 |
CCyR | 3/17 | 10/33 | 13/50 | 4/22 | |
MMR | 2/17 | 3/31 | 5/48 | 2/19 | |
Response at HSCT | BC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 |
AP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
CP | 19 | 34 | 53 | 0 | |
HR | 11 | 19 | 30 | 0 | |
Ccyr | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | |
MMR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Transplant source | Sibling | 10 | 10 | 20 | 9 |
Unrelated | 9 | 24 | 33 | 18 | |
Conditioning therapy | standard | 14 | 21 | 35 | 17 |
reduced | 3 | 6 | 9 | 4 | |
other | 2 | 7 | 9 | 6 | |
Source | PB | 13 | 26 | 39 | 22 |
BM | 6 | 8 | 14 | 5 | |
Dead | 2 | 2 | 4 | 10 | |
TRM | 2 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
CML | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
Probability of survival at 2 years after HSCT | 87.8% | 93.8% | 91.4% | 49.5% |
Disclosures: Gratwohl:Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal