To the editor:

Increasing evidence suggests that donor-recipient disparities for human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–DPB1 can be of clinical importance in unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).1  Two overlapping algorithms for functional T-cell epitope (TCE) matching involving 3 (TCE3) or 4 (TCE4) groups of DPB1 alleles have previously been shown to be significantly predictive of survival after 10/10 and 9/10 matched unrelated HSCT.2,3  In both TCE3 and TCE4, nonpermissive mismatches are directed against 2 groups of immunogenic antigens encoded by DPB1*09:01, 10:01, 17:01 (TCE3/4 group 1) and DPB1*03:01, 14:01, 45:01 (TCE3/4 group 2), respectively.2,3  In TCE3, all other frequent DPB1 alleles including DPB1*02:01, 04:01, 04:02 and others are classified as poorly immunogenic TCE3 group 3, and DPB1 mismatches against these alleles are predicted to be permissive.2  In TCE4, TCE3 group 3 is further subdivided into 2 separate groups comprising DPB1*02 (TCE4 group 3) and the other alleles (TCE4 group 4), with intermediate and poor immunogenicity, respectively.3 

Rutten and colleagues have recently shown that T-cell responses could be obtained against DP antigens from all 4 groups,4,5  thereby confirming the observations that led to the discovery of the DP locus by primed lymphocyte testing,6  as well as those obtained later in mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLRs).7,8  Interestingly, Rutten and colleagues observed high levels of cytokine production by CD4+ T cells in response also to autologous DP molecules presumably presenting minor histocompatibility antigens,5  suggesting that the HeLa cell transfectants expressing DP but not other class II antigens used in their experiments may not quantify physiologic frequencies of alloreactive T helper cells, which increase substantially with the number of mismatched HLA-DP alloantigens in classical in vitro assays.9,10 

Here, we have quantified the frequency of alloreactive CD4+ T cells responding to permissive or nonpermissive TCE3 or TCE4 DP mismatches, in classical MLRs between peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of responder (R)–stimulator (S) pairs matched for 10/10 of the non-DPB1 alleles. When S presented both a permissive and a nonpermissive mismatch, the percentage of responding CD4+ T cells was more than 10-fold higher against the nonpermissive (DPB1*09:01, 10.65%) compared with the permissive mismatch (DPB1*04:02, 0.88%; Figure 1A), and this result was highly reproducible in 3 independent experiments (data not shown). Importantly, in 24 MLRs, we found a consistently higher percentage of CD4+ T cells responding to nonpermissive DPB1 mismatches according to TCE3 (n = 9; mean 10.13% ± 7.51%; Figure 1B left panel) or TCE4 (n = 14; mean 7.72% ± 6.96%; Figure 1B right panel), compared with permissive mismatches according to TCE3 (n = 15; mean 2.34% ± 2.82%; Figure 1B left panel) or TCE4 (n = 10; mean 1.81% ± 2.82%; Figure 1B right panel). In the Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance, this difference was significant both for TCE3 (P < .05) and TCE4 (P < .05). Responses against DPB1*02 (TCE4 group 3), classified as permissive for TCE3 but nonpermissive for TCE4, were significantly lower than those against TCE3/4 groups 1 and 2 (10.13% ± 7.51% and 3.39% ± 2.8%, respectively; P = .04, Mann-Whitney test) but higher than those against TCE4 group 4 (1.81% ± 2.82%), resulting in no significant net effect on the predictive value of TCE3 and TCE4.

Figure 1

Quantification of alloreactive CD4+ T cells responding to permissive or nonpermissive DPB1 TCE3 or TCE4 disparities. Classical 1-way MLRs were set up between R-S pairs of unrelated volunteers selected for the same patient and matched between each other for 10/10 of the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB, and -DQB1 alleles, but mismatched for -DPB1. R cells consisted of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), while S cells in most cases were PBMCs depleted of CD3+ T cells, at a ratio of 1:1. After 2 rounds of stimulation in the presence of 150 IU/mL IL-2, CD4+ T cells were rechallenged overnight with B lymphoblastoid cells (BLCLs) from R, S, or from third-party donors sharing only 1 mismatched DPB1 allele with S. Responding T cells were quantified by FACS analysis for surface expression of the activation marker CD137. In several cases, CD4+ T cells expressing CD137 upon challenge with DPB1 typed third-party BLCLs were FACS-sorted and their specificity for the relevant DP alloantigen was confirmed (not shown). (A) Exemplative analysis of alloreactive CD4+ T cells responding to a permissive or a nonpermissive DPB1 mismatch on the same S cell. R and S cells carried DPB1*02:02, 04:01 and DPB1*04:02, 09:01, respectively, and thus S cells presented 1 TCE3/4 permissive (DPB1*04:02) and 1 TCE3/4 nonpermissive (DPB1*09:01) mismatch. (B) Mean percentage of CD4+ T cells responding to permissive or nonpermissive DPB1 mismatches according to TCE3 (left panel) or TCE4 (right panel), in a series of 24 MLRs. At the moment of testing, cultures contained a mean of 53.75% ± 24.94% CD4+ T cells. The mean percentage of T cells expressing CD137 in response to autologous R-BLCLs was 2.06% ± 1.62%. The percentage of T cells responding specifically to allogeneic read-out BLCLs was calculated as the total percentage of CD137+ T cells after allogeneic stimulation minus the percentage of CD137+ T cells after autologous stimulation. Fully allogeneic R-S pairs (n = 8) were used as positive controls and yielded a mean of 17.53% ± 8.28% specifically responding CD4+ T cells, with a mean of 44.75% ± 25.17% CD4+ T cells. Pairwise comparison of the results obtained in the different groups was performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison posttest. (Left panel) In the TCE3 permissive group (n = 15), the mismatched DPB1 allele expressed by S was encoded by DPB1*02:01 (n = 4), 02:02 (n = 1), 04:01 (n = 5), 04:02 (n = 3), 11:01 (n = 1), 13:01 (n = 1). In the TCE3 nonpermissive group (n = 9), the mismatched DPB1 allele expressed by S was encoded by DPB1*03:01 (n = 3), 09:01 (n = 2), 10:01 (n = 3) or 17:01 (n = 1). The frequency of CD4+ T cells specifically responding to TCE3 permissive mismatches was significantly lower compared with TCE3 nonpermissive mismatches (*P < .05) and compared with fully mismatched third-party alloantigens (***P < .001). (Right panel) In the TCE4 permissive group (n = 10), the mismatched DPB1 allele expressed by S was encoded by DPB1*04:01 (n = 5), 04:02 (n = 3), 11:01 (n = 1), 13:01 (n = 1). In the TCE4 nonpermissive group (n = 15), the mismatched DPB1 allele expressed by S was encoded by DPB1*02:01 (n = 4), 02:02 (n = 1), 03:01 (n = 3), 09:01 (n = 2), 10:01 (n = 3) or 17:01 (n = 1). The frequency of CD4+ T cells specifically responding to TCE4 permissive mismatches was significantly lower compared with TCE4 nonpermissive mismatches (*P < .05) and compared with fully mismatched third-party alloantigens (***P < .001).

Figure 1

Quantification of alloreactive CD4+ T cells responding to permissive or nonpermissive DPB1 TCE3 or TCE4 disparities. Classical 1-way MLRs were set up between R-S pairs of unrelated volunteers selected for the same patient and matched between each other for 10/10 of the HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB, and -DQB1 alleles, but mismatched for -DPB1. R cells consisted of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), while S cells in most cases were PBMCs depleted of CD3+ T cells, at a ratio of 1:1. After 2 rounds of stimulation in the presence of 150 IU/mL IL-2, CD4+ T cells were rechallenged overnight with B lymphoblastoid cells (BLCLs) from R, S, or from third-party donors sharing only 1 mismatched DPB1 allele with S. Responding T cells were quantified by FACS analysis for surface expression of the activation marker CD137. In several cases, CD4+ T cells expressing CD137 upon challenge with DPB1 typed third-party BLCLs were FACS-sorted and their specificity for the relevant DP alloantigen was confirmed (not shown). (A) Exemplative analysis of alloreactive CD4+ T cells responding to a permissive or a nonpermissive DPB1 mismatch on the same S cell. R and S cells carried DPB1*02:02, 04:01 and DPB1*04:02, 09:01, respectively, and thus S cells presented 1 TCE3/4 permissive (DPB1*04:02) and 1 TCE3/4 nonpermissive (DPB1*09:01) mismatch. (B) Mean percentage of CD4+ T cells responding to permissive or nonpermissive DPB1 mismatches according to TCE3 (left panel) or TCE4 (right panel), in a series of 24 MLRs. At the moment of testing, cultures contained a mean of 53.75% ± 24.94% CD4+ T cells. The mean percentage of T cells expressing CD137 in response to autologous R-BLCLs was 2.06% ± 1.62%. The percentage of T cells responding specifically to allogeneic read-out BLCLs was calculated as the total percentage of CD137+ T cells after allogeneic stimulation minus the percentage of CD137+ T cells after autologous stimulation. Fully allogeneic R-S pairs (n = 8) were used as positive controls and yielded a mean of 17.53% ± 8.28% specifically responding CD4+ T cells, with a mean of 44.75% ± 25.17% CD4+ T cells. Pairwise comparison of the results obtained in the different groups was performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Dunn multiple comparison posttest. (Left panel) In the TCE3 permissive group (n = 15), the mismatched DPB1 allele expressed by S was encoded by DPB1*02:01 (n = 4), 02:02 (n = 1), 04:01 (n = 5), 04:02 (n = 3), 11:01 (n = 1), 13:01 (n = 1). In the TCE3 nonpermissive group (n = 9), the mismatched DPB1 allele expressed by S was encoded by DPB1*03:01 (n = 3), 09:01 (n = 2), 10:01 (n = 3) or 17:01 (n = 1). The frequency of CD4+ T cells specifically responding to TCE3 permissive mismatches was significantly lower compared with TCE3 nonpermissive mismatches (*P < .05) and compared with fully mismatched third-party alloantigens (***P < .001). (Right panel) In the TCE4 permissive group (n = 10), the mismatched DPB1 allele expressed by S was encoded by DPB1*04:01 (n = 5), 04:02 (n = 3), 11:01 (n = 1), 13:01 (n = 1). In the TCE4 nonpermissive group (n = 15), the mismatched DPB1 allele expressed by S was encoded by DPB1*02:01 (n = 4), 02:02 (n = 1), 03:01 (n = 3), 09:01 (n = 2), 10:01 (n = 3) or 17:01 (n = 1). The frequency of CD4+ T cells specifically responding to TCE4 permissive mismatches was significantly lower compared with TCE4 nonpermissive mismatches (*P < .05) and compared with fully mismatched third-party alloantigens (***P < .001).

Close modal

Our data provide, for the first time, in vitro evidence for differential immunogenicity of DPB1 according to our algorithms. Interestingly, ex vivo evidence was previously reported by Rutten and colleagues4  who showed that in 2 patients after 10/10 matched HSCT, the number of T cells responding to mismatched DP alloantigens was highest for TCE3/4 group 2 (2.72%), lower for TCE4 group 3 (1.08%), and lowest for TCE4 group 4 (0.41%). Further work is needed to determine the molecular and cellular basis of our algorithms, including the role of the DPα chain.

The authors declare that approval was obtained from the San Raffaele Institutional Review Board for these studies. Informed consent was provided according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), by the Italian Ministry of Health, by the Telethon Foundation, and by the Cariplo Foundation.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Katharina Fleischhauer, UMFI, Division of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milano, Italy; e-mail: fleischhauer.katharina@hsr.it.

1
Madrigal
 
A
Shaw
 
B
Immunogenetic factors in donors and patients that affect the outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Blood Cells Mol Dis
2008
, vol. 
40
 
1
(pg. 
40
-
43
)
2
Zino
 
E
Frumento
 
G
Marktel
 
S
et al. 
A T-cell epitope encoded by a subset of HLA-DPB1 alleles determines nonpermissive mismatches for hematologic stem cell transplantation.
Blood
2004
, vol. 
103
 
4
(pg. 
1417
-
1424
)
3
Crocchiolo
 
R
Zino
 
E
Vago
 
L
et al. 
Nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 disparity is a significant independent risk factor for mortality after unrelated hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Blood
2009
, vol. 
114
 
7
(pg. 
1437
-
1444
)
4
Rutten
 
CE
van Luxemburg-Heijs
 
SA
van der Meijden
 
ED
et al. 
Both permissive and nonpermissive HLA-DPB1 mismatches can induce polyclonal HLA-DPB1 specific immune responses in vitro and in vivo.
Blood
2010
, vol. 
115
 
1
(pg. 
151
-
153
)
5
Rutten
 
CE
van Luxemburg-Heijs
 
SA
van der Meijden
 
ED
et al. 
HLA-DPB1 mismatching results in the generation of a full repertoire of HLA-DPB1 specific CD4+ T-cell responses showing immunogenicity of all HLA-DPB1 alleles.
Biol Blood Marrow Transpl
2010
, vol. 
16
 
9
(pg. 
1282
-
1292
)
6
Shaw
 
S
Johnson
 
AH
Shearer
 
GM
Evidence for a new segregant series of B cell antigens that are encoded in the HLA-D region and that stimulate secondary allogenic proliferative and cytotoxic responses.
J Exp Med
1980
, vol. 
152
 
3
(pg. 
565
-
580
)
7
Cesbron
 
A
Moreau
 
P
Cheneau
 
ML
et al. 
Crucial role of the third and fourth hypervariable regions of HLA-DPB1 allelic sequences in the primary mixed lymphocyte reaction.
Hum Immunol
1992
, vol. 
33
 
3
(pg. 
202
-
207
)
8
Nicholson
 
I
Varney
 
M
Kanaan
 
C
et al. 
Alloresponses to HLA-DP detected in the primary MLR: correlation with a single amino acid difference.
Hum Immunol
1997
, vol. 
55
 
2
(pg. 
163
-
169
)
9
Russel
 
CA
Heilmann
 
C
Madsen
 
HO
et al. 
The predictive value of helper T lymphocyte precursor frequencies for graft-versus-host disease and graft-versus-leukemia effects in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
Bone Marrow Transplant
2001
, vol. 
27
 
9
(pg. 
949
-
958
)
10
Olerup
 
O
Möller
 
E
Persson
 
U
HLA-DP incompatibilities induce significant proliferation in primary mixed lymphocyte cultures in HLA-A, -B, -DR and -DQ compatible individuals: Implications for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
Tissue Antigens
1990
, vol. 
36
 
5
(pg. 
194
-
202
)
Sign in via your Institution