On pages 3687, 3688, and 3689 of the 31 March 2011 issue, there are errors concerning the description of the reference template. In “Methods,” the last sentence reads, “The reference template referred to the allele that showed the lesser positive amplification counts in the sample.” The sentence should have read, “The reference template referred to the wild-type allele.” In Table 2, the description of “m” reads, “Average reference template concentration per PCR well. The reference template referred to the allele with the lesser count in each sample.” The description should have read, “Average reference template concentration per PCR well. The reference template referred to the A allele.” In Tables 3 and 4, the description of “mr” reads, “Average reference template concentration per PCR well. The reference template referred to the allele with the lesser count in each sample.” The description should have read, “Average reference template concentration per PCR well. The reference template referred to the wild-type allele.”
Skip Nav Destination
ERRATA|
May 10, 2012
Tsui NBY, Kadir RA, Chan KCA, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia by microfluidics digital PCR analysis of maternal plasma DNA. Blood. 2011;117(13):3684–3691.
Blood (2012) 119 (19): 4577.
Citation
Tsui NBY, Kadir RA, Chan KCA, et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of hemophilia by microfluidics digital PCR analysis of maternal plasma DNA. Blood. 2011;117(13):3684–3691.. Blood 2012; 119 (19): 4577. doi: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-01-404764
Download citation file:
May 10 2012
Advertisement intended for health care professionals
Cited By
Advertisement intended for health care professionals
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal