This analysis examined the association of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) with prediagnostic carotenoid levels, a marker for a diet rich in fruits and vegetables. We conducted a nested case-control study within the Multiethnic Cohort with 271 NHL cases and 538 controls matched on sex, ethnicity, location (Hawaii or Los Angeles), birth year, date and time of blood draw, and hours fasting before blood draw. Serum carotenoid levels were obtained by high-pressure liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) according to tertiles of serum carotenoids and trend tests using continuous variables. Higher total serum carotenoids (ORT3 vs T1 = 0.66 [0.46-0.96]; Ptrend = .02), lycopene (OR = 0.54 [0.38-0.78]; Ptrend = .003), and α-cryptoxanthin (OR = 0.53 [0.36-0.78]; Ptrend = .003) were associated with a lower risk of NHL. For retinol (OR = 0.90 [0.61-1.33]; Ptrend = .04), a statistically significant inverse linear trend was detected. Risk estimates remained unchanged with adjustment for NHL risk factors and were similar in analyses stratified by sex and ethnicity; heterogeneity with NHL subtype was detected only for β-carotene. Other carotenoids, including α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein, β-cryptoxanthin, and zeaxanthin, showed no association with risk. These data provide support for a protective role of carotenoid-rich fruits and vegetables in the etiology of NHL.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the fifth most common cancer in the United States,1  consisting of a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that arise from the malignant transformation of B, T, and natural killer cells of the immune system.2,3  Immune dysfunction is thought to be the underlying basis of lymphoma development, but well-characterized immunosuppressive states (HIV infection and organ transplants) only partially explain the rising NHL risk over the past decades.4  Based on the hypothesis that lymphoid tissues are vulnerable to nutrient imbalances affecting metabolic pathways and functions necessary to maintain immune functions,5,6  the association between dietary factors and the risk of NHL has been examined.7,8  Reports from retrospective case-control studies9-18  and prospective cohorts19-21  have found inverse associations between fruit intake, vegetable intake, or both and NHL, although null findings also have been reported.22-26 

Dietary carotenoids are a class of fat-soluble isoprenoid compounds obtained primarily through the consumption of yellow-orange fruits and vegetables, green leafy vegetables, and tomatoes; they can function as antioxidants and some function as vitamin A precursors.27  In a Western diet, carrots are the major source of carotenes, spinach and other green leafy vegetables of lutein and zeaxanthin, tomatoes of lycopene, and citrus of cryptoxanthins.27,28  Carotenoids reduce the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cell membranes and therefore may limit DNA damage and the potential for the malignant transformation of immune cells through the inhibition of radical species.29-31  Serum levels of carotenoids are considered valid biologic markers for fruit and vegetable intake, and, to date, they have not been investigated in relation to NHL risk.27  For the present nested case-control study, we examined whether prediagnostic serum levels of total and specific carotenoids were associated with incident diagnoses of NHL among individuals participating in the biospecimen subcohort of the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study.

Study design and population

The MEC is a longitudinal study designed to investigate the associations of dietary, life style, and genetic factors with the incidence of cancer and was previously described in detail.32  In brief, the cohort was established from 1993 to 1996 by mailing a self-administered, 26-page questionnaire to men and women ages 45 to 75 years residing in Hawaii and California. To obtain a multiethnic sample of blacks, Japanese Americans, Latinos, Native Hawaiians, and whites, the primary sampling frame included drivers' license records in both states, supplemented with voter registration lists in Hawaii and Medicare files in California. More than 215 000 men and women voluntarily completed the baseline questionnaire, indicating their consent to participate in the study. The questionnaire included queries on demographic characteristics, anthropometric measures, medical history, family history of cancer, smoking history, reproductive and menstrual history for women, cancer screening, occupational history, and physical activity, as well as a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ).33 

The prospective MEC biospecimen subcohort was established from 2001 to 2006 by asking the ∼ 136 000 surviving and geographically accessible cohort members to provide specimens of blood and urine.34  Blood samples were drawn and processed within 4 hours of collection by centrifugation. Then, the components were aliquoted by automation into 0.5-mL cryotubes and stored in the vapor phase of liquid nitrogen (−186°C). For ∼ 95% of the participants contributing to the biorepository, fasting blood samples (≥ 8 hours) were obtained. In total, 67 594 cohort members (49.7% of eligible) contributed to the biorepository from which the cases and controls were selected for the present study. comparing individuals who provided specimens with those who did not, no substantial difference by several demographic characteristics and cancer risk factors, including family history of cancer, body mass index (BMI), fat and vegetable intake, and physical activity, was detected; this suggests that the biospecimen repository participants are broadly representative of all cohort members. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the University of Hawaii and the University of Southern California.

Case ascertainment and control selection

Cases for this analysis were participants from the 5 main ethnic groups, black, white, Japanese American, Native Hawaiian, and Latino, who contributed a prediagnostic fasting blood sample to the MEC biorepository and received a diagnosis of NHL before February 28, 2010. Regular linkages of the cohort to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries for Hawaii and California were conducted to identify incident NHL cases diagnosed over the follow-up period. In an investigation within the entire cohort, the average out-migration rate for members was only 3.7% after 7 years and 7.6% after 15 years of follow-up, with California as the primary destination for Hawaii participants. Therefore, case ascertainment is thought to be close to complete. Diagnoses of NHL were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition and aggregated into common NHL subtypes in accordance with the proposed hierarchical classification of lymphoid neoplasms for epidemiologic research.3 

Two controls per case were randomly selected from the eligible pool of participants who were alive and free of a diagnosis of NHL at the age of the case's diagnosis and who matched the case on year of birth (± 1 year), location (Hawaii or California), ethnicity, date of blood draw (± 1 year), time of blood draw (± 2 hours), and hours fasting before blood draw (< 6, 6 to < 8, 8 to < 10, ≥ 10). In total, 275 cases were identified over the follow-up period and matched to 549 controls. Insufficient sample for analysis led to missing values for 4 cases and 3 controls. After their exclusion, as well as that of any sets with no cases or controls, 271 cases and 538 controls were available for the present analysis.

Laboratory assays

All assays were performed at the University of Hawaii Cancer Center in the laboratory of Dr Adrian Franke. Frozen serum samples were retrieved from the MEC biorepository in matched case-control sets, thawed, and analyzed together within batches. The laboratory personnel were blinded to the case-control status of the samples. High-pressure liquid chromatography with photodiode array detection, according to our previous protocol,35-37  was used to obtain carotenoid concentrations. This assay is continuously validated by quality assurance programs organized by the US National Institute of Standards and Technology. In addition, replicate samples of pooled serum were included in each analysis batch for quality control. Based on 27 duplicate and 9 triplet samples, the average intrabatch coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 4.1% and the average interbatch CV was less than 9.1% for all analytes. Serum triglycerides and cholesterol were measured using an automated chemical analyzer (Cobas, MiraPlus, Roche Diagnostics).

Statistical analysis

Data analyses were performed using SAS Version 9.2 statistical software. All tests were 2-sided; P less than .05 was considered statistically significant. Characteristics of cases and controls were compared using χ2 tests for categorical variables, t tests for normally distributed continuous variables, and the nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test for non-normally distributed variables. Spearman correlation coefficients were computed between serum carotenoids and intake estimates derived from the baseline FFQ.33 

Conditional logistic regression with matched sets as strata was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for NHL. Tertiles of serum carotenoids were examined in all models using cut-points based on the exposure distribution of the total study population to optimize the distribution of cases and controls within strata. The lowest exposure group served as the referent in all models. Linear trends were assessed by Wald tests of the parameter estimates for the natural log–transformed continuous variables. Years of education; alcohol consumption; pack-years of cigarette smoking; BMI, physical activity; history of blood transfusion; history of asthma; use of antihistamine, aspirin, and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and serum triglycerides, and high-density, low-density, and total cholesterol were examined as potential confounders but were not included in the final models because they were not found alone, or in combination, to change the risk estimates by more than 10%.38  Sensitivity analyses were performed by excluding participants diagnosed with NHL within 1 year after the date of blood draw.

Associations between serum carotenoids and the risk of NHL also were examined in analyses stratified by sex, ethnicity, and common NHL subtypes.3  Common subtypes included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL), T-cell lymphoma (all types), and all other NHL subtypes. No separate ORs were calculated for the latter 2 categories because of the limited number of T-cell cases (n = 15) and the subtype heterogeneity for the cases classified as “other.” Heterogeneity in the risk estimates by sex and ethnicity was assessed using a Wald test of the cross-product terms and across the 3 NHL subtypes using a Wald test of the parameter estimates obtained from unconditional polytomous logistic regression adjusting for the matching factors and comparing case subgroups to all controls.

The mean age at blood draw of both cases and controls was 70 years (Table 1), and the median time from the date of blood draw to the date of diagnosis was 2.7 years. Whites comprised the largest ethnic group (28%), followed by Japanese Americans (26%), Latinos (23%), blacks (17%), and Native Hawaiians (6%). No differences in the levels of educational attainment, BMI, pack-years of cigarette smoking, physical activity, alcohol consumption, or positive history of blood transfusion were detected between cases and controls (P > .05). The serum concentrations of total carotenoids, lycopene, dihydrolycopene, and α-cryptoxanthin were significantly lower for cases than for controls (P < .05); the differences in levels by case-control status did not reach statistical significance for β-carotene and trans-lutein (P = .08 and .09, respectively) or for α-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, trans-zeaxanthin, and retinol. The majority of NHL cases were of B-cell origin (> 94%) and classified as diffuse DLBCL (29%), CLL/SLL (19%), FL (18%), or other NHL B-cell subtypes (29%), with a small number of T-cell lymphomas (6%) diagnosed over the follow-up period.

Table 1

Characteristics of participants in the NHL nested case-control study

CharacteristicCases (n = 271)Controls (n = 538)P*
Mean age at blood draw, y (SD) 70.0 (7.4) 70.0 (7.5)  
Hours fasting before blood draw, mean (SD) 12.0 (4.0) 12.3 (4.1)  
Male, n (%) 157 (57.9) 312 (58.0)  
Ethnicity, n (%)    
    Black 46 (17.0) 92 (17.1)  
    Native Hawaiian 17 (6.3) 33 (6.1)  
    Japanese American 72 (26.6) 142 (26.4)  
    Latino 62 (22.9) 123 (22.9)  
    White 74 (27.3) 148 (27.5)  
Years of education, mean (SD) 13.7 (3.0) 13.7 (3.2) .88 
Mean BMI, kg/m2 (SD) 26.9 (5.3) 26.4 (4.3) .16 
Pack-years of cigarette smoking, mean (SD) 10.5 (15.1) 9.8 (15.2) .54 
Mean physical activity, h/d (SD) 1.2 (1.2) 1.3 (1.4) .29 
Mean alcohol intake, g/d (SD) 9.7 (24.4) 11.2 (28.4) .43 
Positive history of blood transfusion, n (%) 23 (8.5) 53 (9.9) .53 
NHL subtype, n (%)    
    DLBCL 78 (28.8)   
    Follicular lymphoma 49 (18.1)   
    T-cell lymphomas 15 (5.5)   
    SLL/CLL 51 (18.8)   
    Other types 78 (28.8)   
Total carotenoids, ng/mL 1184 (862-1659) 1326 (965-1769) .02 
    α-carotene, ng/mL 48 (29-81) 54 (32-83) .20 
    β-carotene, ng/mL 224 (118-440) 264 (147-430) .08 
    Lycopene, ng/mL 370 (275-521) 439 (320-583) < .01 
    Dihydrolycopene, ng/mL 93 (67-127) 107 (79-138) < .01 
    trans-lutein, ng/mL 96 (73-129) 104 (78-138) .09 
    α-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL 30 (22-41) 33 (26-43) < .01 
    β-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL 156 (103-270) 168 (106-295) .45 
    trans-zeaxanthin, ng/mL 20 (16-26) 20 (16-26) .87 
Retinol, ng/mL 648 (527-798) 661 (562-780) .19 
CharacteristicCases (n = 271)Controls (n = 538)P*
Mean age at blood draw, y (SD) 70.0 (7.4) 70.0 (7.5)  
Hours fasting before blood draw, mean (SD) 12.0 (4.0) 12.3 (4.1)  
Male, n (%) 157 (57.9) 312 (58.0)  
Ethnicity, n (%)    
    Black 46 (17.0) 92 (17.1)  
    Native Hawaiian 17 (6.3) 33 (6.1)  
    Japanese American 72 (26.6) 142 (26.4)  
    Latino 62 (22.9) 123 (22.9)  
    White 74 (27.3) 148 (27.5)  
Years of education, mean (SD) 13.7 (3.0) 13.7 (3.2) .88 
Mean BMI, kg/m2 (SD) 26.9 (5.3) 26.4 (4.3) .16 
Pack-years of cigarette smoking, mean (SD) 10.5 (15.1) 9.8 (15.2) .54 
Mean physical activity, h/d (SD) 1.2 (1.2) 1.3 (1.4) .29 
Mean alcohol intake, g/d (SD) 9.7 (24.4) 11.2 (28.4) .43 
Positive history of blood transfusion, n (%) 23 (8.5) 53 (9.9) .53 
NHL subtype, n (%)    
    DLBCL 78 (28.8)   
    Follicular lymphoma 49 (18.1)   
    T-cell lymphomas 15 (5.5)   
    SLL/CLL 51 (18.8)   
    Other types 78 (28.8)   
Total carotenoids, ng/mL 1184 (862-1659) 1326 (965-1769) .02 
    α-carotene, ng/mL 48 (29-81) 54 (32-83) .20 
    β-carotene, ng/mL 224 (118-440) 264 (147-430) .08 
    Lycopene, ng/mL 370 (275-521) 439 (320-583) < .01 
    Dihydrolycopene, ng/mL 93 (67-127) 107 (79-138) < .01 
    trans-lutein, ng/mL 96 (73-129) 104 (78-138) .09 
    α-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL 30 (22-41) 33 (26-43) < .01 
    β-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL 156 (103-270) 168 (106-295) .45 
    trans-zeaxanthin, ng/mL 20 (16-26) 20 (16-26) .87 
Retinol, ng/mL 648 (527-798) 661 (562-780) .19 

DLBCL indicates diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; and SLL/CLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic lymphoma.

*

P values obtained by χ2 test for categorical variables; t tests were performed for all continuous variables except for the non-normally distributed carotenoids, for which a nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used.

Matching variable; cases and controls were matched on sex, birth year (± 1 year), location (Hawaii or California), ethnicity, date of blood draw (± 1 year), time of blood draw (± 2 hours), and hours fasting before blood draw (< 6, 6 to < 8, 8 to < 10, ≥ 10).

Medians and 25th-75th percentiles are presented for carotenoids and retinol.

Higher serum levels of total carotenoids (ORT3 vs T1 = 0.66 [0.46-0.96]; Ptrend = .02), lycopene (OR = 0.54 [0.38-0.78]; Ptrend = .003), dihydrolycopene (OR = 0.51 [0.35-0.73]; Ptrend = .007), and α-cryptoxanthin (OR = 0.53 [0.36-0.78]; Ptrend = .003) were associated with a lower risk of NHL (Table 2). A statistically significant inverse trend was detected for retinol (Ptrend = .04); however, risk estimates did not depart from unity in models examining tertiles of exposure. The risk estimates for β-carotene (OR = 0.77 [0.53-1.12]; Ptrend = .06) and trans-lutein (OR = 0.71 [0.48-1.04]; Ptrend = .08) included 1. No statistically significant associations were detected for α-carotene, β-cryptoxanthin, and trans-zeaxanthin. The associations were similar in a sensitivity analyses excluding the cases (n = 53) diagnosed with NHL within 1 year after the date of blood draw and their matched controls; however, the risk estimate for total carotenoids (OR = 0.72 [0.48-1.10]; Ptrend = .11) no longer departed from unity.

Table 2

Association of NHL with tertiles of serum carotenoids

BiomarkerT1T2T3Ptrend*
Total carotenoids, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 1040.49 1040.49-1550.33 ≥ 1550.34  
    Cases/controls 109/159 76/195 86/184  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.56 (0.38-0.81) 0.66 (0.46-0.96) .02 
α-carotene, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 38.53 38.53-68.75 ≥ 68.76  
    Cases/controls 102/169 80/190 89/179  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.70 (0.49-1.00) 0.81 (0.56-1.17) .34 
β-carotene, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 167.52 167.52-353.05 ≥ 353.06  
    Cases/controls 101/164 79/188 91/186  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.67 (0.47-0.97) 0.77 (0.53-1.12) .06 
Lycopene, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 345.70 345.70-510.43 ≥ 510.44  
    Cases/controls 109/155 87/184 75/199  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.68 (0.48-0.97) 0.54 (0.38-0.78) .003 
Dihydrolycopene, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 85.14 85.14-122.47 ≥ 122.48  
    Cases/controls 110/155 88/182 73/201  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.69 (0.48-0.98) 0.51 (0.35-0.73) .007 
trans-lutein, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 84.33 84.33-122.36 ≥ 122.37  
    Cases/controls 95/173 98/174 78/191  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.03 (0.73-1.46) 0.71 (0.48-1.04) .08 
α-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 27.16 27.16-37.72 ≥ 37.73  
    Cases/controls 112/158 79/187 80/193  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.57 (0.40-0.82) 0.53 (0.36-0.78) .003 
β-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 126.45 126.45-232.90 ≥ 232.91  
    Cases/controls 90/181 100/169 81/188  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.18 (0.83-1.68) 0.84 (0.57-1.24) .55 
trans-zeaxanthin, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 16.92 16.92-24.05 ≥ 24.06  
    Cases/controls 88/180 96/177 87/181  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.12 (0.78-1.60) 0.98 (0.68-1.43) .66 
Retinol, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 587.75 587.75-740.43 ≥ 740.44  
    Cases/controls 98/176 84/186 89/176  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.81 (0.56-1.16) 0.90 (0.61-1.33) .04 
BiomarkerT1T2T3Ptrend*
Total carotenoids, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 1040.49 1040.49-1550.33 ≥ 1550.34  
    Cases/controls 109/159 76/195 86/184  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.56 (0.38-0.81) 0.66 (0.46-0.96) .02 
α-carotene, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 38.53 38.53-68.75 ≥ 68.76  
    Cases/controls 102/169 80/190 89/179  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.70 (0.49-1.00) 0.81 (0.56-1.17) .34 
β-carotene, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 167.52 167.52-353.05 ≥ 353.06  
    Cases/controls 101/164 79/188 91/186  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.67 (0.47-0.97) 0.77 (0.53-1.12) .06 
Lycopene, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 345.70 345.70-510.43 ≥ 510.44  
    Cases/controls 109/155 87/184 75/199  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.68 (0.48-0.97) 0.54 (0.38-0.78) .003 
Dihydrolycopene, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 85.14 85.14-122.47 ≥ 122.48  
    Cases/controls 110/155 88/182 73/201  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.69 (0.48-0.98) 0.51 (0.35-0.73) .007 
trans-lutein, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 84.33 84.33-122.36 ≥ 122.37  
    Cases/controls 95/173 98/174 78/191  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.03 (0.73-1.46) 0.71 (0.48-1.04) .08 
α-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 27.16 27.16-37.72 ≥ 37.73  
    Cases/controls 112/158 79/187 80/193  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.57 (0.40-0.82) 0.53 (0.36-0.78) .003 
β-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 126.45 126.45-232.90 ≥ 232.91  
    Cases/controls 90/181 100/169 81/188  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.18 (0.83-1.68) 0.84 (0.57-1.24) .55 
trans-zeaxanthin, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 16.92 16.92-24.05 ≥ 24.06  
    Cases/controls 88/180 96/177 87/181  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 1.12 (0.78-1.60) 0.98 (0.68-1.43) .66 
Retinol, ng/mL     
    Tertile cut-points < 587.75 587.75-740.43 ≥ 740.44  
    Cases/controls 98/176 84/186 89/176  
    OR (95% CI) 1.00 0.81 (0.56-1.16) 0.90 (0.61-1.33) .04 

ORs and 95% CI estimated from conditional logistic regression with matched sets as strata. Cases and controls were matched on sex, age (± 1 year), location (Hawaii or California), ethnicity, date of blood draw (± 1 year), time of blood draw (± 2 hours), and hours fasting before blood draw (< 6, 6 to < 8, 8 to < 10, ≥ 10).

*

P value for the Wald χ2 test of Ho: β = 0 when modeling the natural log–transformed continuous variable.

No heterogeneity in the risk estimates was detected in analyses stratified by sex (P = .77) or by ethnicity (P = .99; data not shown). After stratification by common NHL subtype (Table 3), the inverse association for higher serum levels of total carotenoids, β-carotene, lycopene, and dihydrolycopene was confined to DLBCL. At the same time, α-cryptoxanthin remained inversely associated with DLBCL and CLL/SLL and serum retinol with the risk of DLBCL and FL. However, statistically significant heterogeneity in risk estimates across histologic subtypes was detected only for β-carotene (P = .0001).

Table 3

Association of NHL subtypes with tertiles of serum carotenoids

ControlsDLBCL
FL
CLL/SLL
Pheterogeneity*
CasesOR (95% CI)CasesOR (95% CI)CasesOR (95% CI)
Total carotenoids, ng/mL         
    < 1040.49 159 37 1.00 15 1.00 20 1.00  
    1040.49-1550.33 195 20 0.42 (0.23-0.76) 15 0.86 (0.40-1.86) 15 0.59 (0.29-1.21)  
    ≥ 1550.34 184 21 0.46 (0.25-0.84) 19 1.07 (0.51-2.27) 16 0.73 (0.36-1.49)  
    Ptrend   < 0.01  0.27  0.34 .29 
α-carotene, ng/mL         
    < 38.53 169 35 1.00 16 1.00 20 1.00  
    38.53-68.75 190 19 0.47 (0.25-0.85) 14 0.69 (0.32-1.49) 17 0.85 (0.42-1.71)  
    ≥ 68.76 179 24 0.62 (0.34-1.11) 19 0.96 (0.46-2.03) 14 0.77 (0.36-1.62)  
    Ptrend   0.24  0.48  0.64 .89 
β-carotene, ng/mL         
    < 167.52 164 38 1.00 15 1.00 18 1.00  
    167.52-353.05 188 21 0.44 (0.24-0.79) 16 0.94 (0.44-2.02) 15 0.78 (0.37-1.62)  
    ≥ 353.06 186 19 0.38 (0.20-0.71) 18 1.04 (0.48-2.26) 18 0.95 (0.46-1.96)  
    Ptrend   < 0.01  0.89  0.84 < .01 
Lycopene, ng/mL       3w1112  
    < 345.70 155 34 1.00 18 1.00 17 1.00  
    345.70-510.43 184 22 0.54 (0.30-0.96) 18 0.85 (0.42-1.72) 22 1.11 (0.56-2.20)  
    ≥ 510.44 199 22 0.51 (0.28-0.91) 13 0.53 (0.25-1.14) 12 0.52 (0.24-1.15)  
    Ptrend   < 0.01  0.12  0.19 .44 
Dihydrolycopene, ng/mL         
    < 85.14 155 32 1.00 18 1.00 19 1.00  
    85.14-122.47 182 26 0.68 (0.39-1.20) 17 0.84 (0.41-1.73) 21 0.92 (0.47-1.80)  
    ≥ 122.48 /201 20 0.49 (0.27-0.89) 14 0.54 (0.26-1.16) 11 0.45 (0.20-0.99)  
    Ptrend   0.01  0.11  0.23 .59 
trans-lutein, ng/mL         
    < 84.33 173 28 1.00 21 1.00 18 1.00  
    84.33-122.36 174 1.06 (0.60-1.86) 13 0.59 (0.28-1.26) 22 1.21 (0.62-2.37)  
    ≥ 122.37 191 20 0.62 (0.33-1.17) 15 0.64 (0.31-1.35) 11 0.59 (0.26-1.30)  
    Ptrend   0.16  0.28  0.10 .93 
α-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL         
    < 27.16 158 36 1.00 19 1.00 25 1.00  
    27.16-37.72 187 25 0.57 (0.32-1.00) 12 0.48 (0.22-1.03) 0.27 (0.12-0.60)  
    ≥ 37.73 193 17 0.35 (0.19-0.68) 18 0.76 (0.37-1.57) 17 0.47 (0.23-0.95)  
    Ptrend   0.02  0.10  0.07 .99 
β-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL         
    < 126.45 181 33 1.00 15 1.00 16 1.00  
    126.45-232.90 171 21 0.64 (0.35-1.16) 22 1.50 (0.74-3.05) 21 1.45 (0.72-2.93)  
    ≥ 232.91 186 24 0.66 (0.36-1.21) 12 0.70 (0.31-1.61) 14 1.04 (0.47-2.28)  
    Ptrend   0.49  0.74  0.71 .98 
trans-zeaxanthin, ng/mL         
    < 16.92 180 25 1.00 16 1.00 19 1.00  
    16.92-24.05 177 30 1.21 (0.68-2.15) 14 0.85 (0.39-1.83) 21 1.19 (0.61-2.32)  
    ≥ 24.06 181 23 0.90 (0.48-1.66) 19 1.25 (0.60-2.60) 11 0.60 (0.27-1.32)  
    Ptrend   0.87  0.89  0.24 .67 
    Retinol, ng/mL         
    < 587.75 176 27 1.00 26 1.00 18 1.00  
    587.75-740.43 186 30 1.03 (0.59-1.81) 13 0.49 (0.24-0.99) 14 0.69 (0.33-1.44)  
    ≥ 740.44 176 21 0.75 (0.40-1.40) 10 0.47 (0.21-1.04) 19 0.83 (0.41-1.67)  
    Ptrend   0.02  0.03  0.73 .48 
ControlsDLBCL
FL
CLL/SLL
Pheterogeneity*
CasesOR (95% CI)CasesOR (95% CI)CasesOR (95% CI)
Total carotenoids, ng/mL         
    < 1040.49 159 37 1.00 15 1.00 20 1.00  
    1040.49-1550.33 195 20 0.42 (0.23-0.76) 15 0.86 (0.40-1.86) 15 0.59 (0.29-1.21)  
    ≥ 1550.34 184 21 0.46 (0.25-0.84) 19 1.07 (0.51-2.27) 16 0.73 (0.36-1.49)  
    Ptrend   < 0.01  0.27  0.34 .29 
α-carotene, ng/mL         
    < 38.53 169 35 1.00 16 1.00 20 1.00  
    38.53-68.75 190 19 0.47 (0.25-0.85) 14 0.69 (0.32-1.49) 17 0.85 (0.42-1.71)  
    ≥ 68.76 179 24 0.62 (0.34-1.11) 19 0.96 (0.46-2.03) 14 0.77 (0.36-1.62)  
    Ptrend   0.24  0.48  0.64 .89 
β-carotene, ng/mL         
    < 167.52 164 38 1.00 15 1.00 18 1.00  
    167.52-353.05 188 21 0.44 (0.24-0.79) 16 0.94 (0.44-2.02) 15 0.78 (0.37-1.62)  
    ≥ 353.06 186 19 0.38 (0.20-0.71) 18 1.04 (0.48-2.26) 18 0.95 (0.46-1.96)  
    Ptrend   < 0.01  0.89  0.84 < .01 
Lycopene, ng/mL       3w1112  
    < 345.70 155 34 1.00 18 1.00 17 1.00  
    345.70-510.43 184 22 0.54 (0.30-0.96) 18 0.85 (0.42-1.72) 22 1.11 (0.56-2.20)  
    ≥ 510.44 199 22 0.51 (0.28-0.91) 13 0.53 (0.25-1.14) 12 0.52 (0.24-1.15)  
    Ptrend   < 0.01  0.12  0.19 .44 
Dihydrolycopene, ng/mL         
    < 85.14 155 32 1.00 18 1.00 19 1.00  
    85.14-122.47 182 26 0.68 (0.39-1.20) 17 0.84 (0.41-1.73) 21 0.92 (0.47-1.80)  
    ≥ 122.48 /201 20 0.49 (0.27-0.89) 14 0.54 (0.26-1.16) 11 0.45 (0.20-0.99)  
    Ptrend   0.01  0.11  0.23 .59 
trans-lutein, ng/mL         
    < 84.33 173 28 1.00 21 1.00 18 1.00  
    84.33-122.36 174 1.06 (0.60-1.86) 13 0.59 (0.28-1.26) 22 1.21 (0.62-2.37)  
    ≥ 122.37 191 20 0.62 (0.33-1.17) 15 0.64 (0.31-1.35) 11 0.59 (0.26-1.30)  
    Ptrend   0.16  0.28  0.10 .93 
α-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL         
    < 27.16 158 36 1.00 19 1.00 25 1.00  
    27.16-37.72 187 25 0.57 (0.32-1.00) 12 0.48 (0.22-1.03) 0.27 (0.12-0.60)  
    ≥ 37.73 193 17 0.35 (0.19-0.68) 18 0.76 (0.37-1.57) 17 0.47 (0.23-0.95)  
    Ptrend   0.02  0.10  0.07 .99 
β-cryptoxanthin, ng/mL         
    < 126.45 181 33 1.00 15 1.00 16 1.00  
    126.45-232.90 171 21 0.64 (0.35-1.16) 22 1.50 (0.74-3.05) 21 1.45 (0.72-2.93)  
    ≥ 232.91 186 24 0.66 (0.36-1.21) 12 0.70 (0.31-1.61) 14 1.04 (0.47-2.28)  
    Ptrend   0.49  0.74  0.71 .98 
trans-zeaxanthin, ng/mL         
    < 16.92 180 25 1.00 16 1.00 19 1.00  
    16.92-24.05 177 30 1.21 (0.68-2.15) 14 0.85 (0.39-1.83) 21 1.19 (0.61-2.32)  
    ≥ 24.06 181 23 0.90 (0.48-1.66) 19 1.25 (0.60-2.60) 11 0.60 (0.27-1.32)  
    Ptrend   0.87  0.89  0.24 .67 
    Retinol, ng/mL         
    < 587.75 176 27 1.00 26 1.00 18 1.00  
    587.75-740.43 186 30 1.03 (0.59-1.81) 13 0.49 (0.24-0.99) 14 0.69 (0.33-1.44)  
    ≥ 740.44 176 21 0.75 (0.40-1.40) 10 0.47 (0.21-1.04) 19 0.83 (0.41-1.67)  
    Ptrend   0.02  0.03  0.73 .48 

ORs and 95% CI estimated from conditional logistic regression with matched sets as strata. Cases and controls were matched on sex, age (± 1 year), study site (Hawaii or California), ethnicity, date of blood draw (± 1 year), time of blood draw (± 2 hours), and hours fasting prior to blood draw (< 6, 6 to < 8, 8 to < 10, ≥ 10).

*

P value for the test of heterogeneity in the parameter estimates for the log-transformed continuous variables across the NHL subtypes.

P value for the Wald χ2 of Ho: β = 0 when modeling the natural log–transformed continuous variable.

A comparison of serum levels with energy-adjusted nutrient intake levels based on the baseline FFQ showed Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.21 for total carotenoids, 0.29 for α-carotene, 0.27 for β-carotene, and 0.16 for lycopene and lutein (P < .0001 for all).

In this nested case-control study, prediagnostic total carotenoids measured in serum were associated with a reduced risk of NHL; in particular, lycopene and α-cryptoxanthin were associated with a 30% to 50% lower risk of disease. Risk estimates for β-carotene, lutein, and retinol were also suggestive of a protective effect. When stratified by common NHL subtype, significant associations were generally confined to DLBCL, probably reflecting the small number of cases for the other subtypes examined. Given the lack of an a priori hypothesis, the subtype heterogeneity for β-carotene may represent a chance finding and requires replication.

To the best of our knowledge, no previous study has directly investigated the association between prediagnostic serum carotenoid levels and the risk of NHL. Previous studies, in agreement with our findings in blood, have reported inverse associations for individual carotenoids estimated from FFQs,9,10,12-14,18,21  as well as for carotenoid-rich foods, including green leafy vegetables9-15  and yellow-orange vegetables.9,10,17,20,21  Associations for the intake of fruits in relation to the risk of NHL have been less consistent.9,16,19  In addition to the potential for recall bias in retrospective case-controls studies of diet, the difficulty in obtaining precise estimates of carotenoids levels when measured by a FFQ raises concerns regarding previous findings. As shown by the modest correlations of 0.16 to 0.29 in our population, serum carotenoid levels do not represent the same exposure as FFQ-based dietary intakes. Thus, prospective analyses of circulating carotenoid levels probably provide for a more valid assessment. Interactions between the intake of vegetables and genetic polymorphisms in pathways involved in oxidative stress, DNA repair, and carcinogen metabolism in relation to NHL risk may influence the results of individual studies, in particular those with null findings,22-26  and warrant further examination.39,40 

Despite our lack of a priori hypothesis and the limited evidence of heterogeneity across common NHL subtypes examined in our analysis, the finding of significant risk estimates primarily confined to DLBCL agrees with several previous reports.12-14,23,24  However, inverse associations with dietary intake of carotenoids have been reported for other NHL subtypes.11,21 

Multiple mechanisms of action for carotenoids in relation to NHL have been proposed. Carotenoids, functioning as antioxidants, may reduce the potential for malignant transformation of lymphoid cells by limiting DNA damage induced by ROS and reactive nitrogen species. In addition to genotoxic effects, ROS have been implicated in tumor promotion and may adversely affect the rates of cellular proliferation and differentiation.41  Carotenoids also may influence the risk of NHL through immune-mediated pathways.31,42  For example, elderly subjects who received supplementation with carotenoid-containing vitamins and trace elements showed a higher production of the cytokine IL-2 and a lower rate of infections,43  and a carotenoid-rich vegetable intervention suppressed the secretion of IL-2 and IL-4.44,45 

This study had several strengths, including the prospective design that allowed for the prediagnostic assessment of serum carotenoid levels, the ethnic diversity of the study sample, and the population-based sampling frame allowing for generalizability of results. Although NHL diagnoses could not be confirmed by the rereview of pathology records, the majority of histologic subtypes are expected to be correctly classified within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry; all cases were diagnosed after the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition classification had been adopted.3  There were also limitations. Only a single biologic sample was available for this analysis. Because seasonal variations have been observed for these nutrients,36  misclassification may have attenuated the risk estimates. However, in contrast to other nutrients, intraindividual circulating carotenoid levels seem to be relatively stable over time.46,47  For example, an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.82 to 0.84 over 2 to 4 weeks was reported previously.46  The fat-soluble nature and the relatively long half-life of carotenoids, estimated as 26 to 76 days in 1 report,48  contribute to this stability. Despite the potential for higher sun exposure in Hawaii and California, we consider it unlikely that vitamin D intake influenced the findings through competitive binding with retinol because a large pooling project of cohort studies did not detect an association between circulating vitamin D and NHL risk and vitamin D levels within the MEC were comparable with other sites.49 

Furthermore, the median follow-up time from the date of blood draw to the date of diagnosis for this analysis was less than 2.7 years. Despite this relatively short follow-up period, no differences in the risk estimates were detected in sensitivity analyses excluding cases diagnosed within the first year of providing a biologic specimen. Longer follow-up of the MEC and other cohorts is needed to confirm these findings with greater statistical power. Although information on HIV status, family history of lymphoma, presence of autoimmune disease, immunosuppression, or agricultural exposure was not available and could not be examined as potential confounders, these conditions are expected to be rare in this relatively healthy cohort population. In addition, the small number of cases limited our ability to detect statistically significant associations in subgroup analyses. Finally, the characteristics of our study population with a mean age of 70 years and relatively high carotenoid levels limit the generalizability of our findings to younger individuals and to those with lower carotenoid exposure. Compared with a value of 1284 ng/mL in the MEC, the 2003 to 2006 US data show median levels of ∼ 770 ng/mL for total carotenoids in adults 60 years of age or older.50 

In conclusion, our findings provide support for the hypothesis that higher levels of circulating carotenoids, presumably from the consumption of carotenoid-rich foods, are associated with a lower risk of NHL. Additional prospective studies and longer follow-up of the MEC and other cohorts over time are needed to confirm these findings in larger populations and to establish long-term relations between serum carotenoids and NHL risk. To further elucidate the role of prediagnostic circulating carotenoids for specific common NHL subtypes, pooled analyses of prospective data are needed. In addition, future studies focused on investigating whether circulating carotenoids may influence the risk of NHL through oxidative stress pathways or through immune function may provide further insights. Non-invasive approaches to measure carotenoid levels, eg, dermal resonance Raman spectroscopy, may facilitate exposure assessment for such epidemiologic studies in the future.51 

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.

Cynthia Morrison is acknowledged for the technical performance of the HPLC assays.

The MEC study has been supported by National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant R37 CA 54281 (L.N.K.) and the biorepository by P01 CA 033619 (L.N.K.). N.J.O. and S.M.C. were supported by a postdoctoral fellowship on grant R25 CA 90956. The tumor registries in Hawaii and Los Angeles are supported by NCI contracts N01 PC 35137 and N01 PC 35139, respectively. The HPLC assays were supported by NCI award CA71789.

National Institutes of Health

Contribution: N.J.O. performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript; G.M. planned the study, procured funding, planned the statistical analysis, and finalized the paper; S.M.C. and Y.M. participated in the statistical analysis and contributed to the writing of the paper; A.A.F. and R.V.C. were responsible for the laboratory assays, the quality control, and the analytical methods section. L.R.W. was in charge of the selection of cases and controls, directed the specimen assembly, and supervised the statistical analysis; L.L.M., M.T.G., B.Y.H., B.E.H., and L.N.K. participated in planning the project and contributed to the analysis and to the writing; and all authors approved the final manuscript.

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence: Gertraud Maskarinec, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 1236 Lauhala St, Honolulu, HI 96813; e-mail: gertraud@cc.hawaii.edu.

1
Siegel
 
R
Ward
 
E
Brawley
 
O
Jemal
 
A
Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths.
CA Cancer J Clin
2011
, vol. 
61
 
4
(pg. 
212
-
236
)
2
Evens
 
AM
Chiu
 
BC
The challenges of epidemiologic research in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
JAMA
2008
, vol. 
300
 
17
(pg. 
2059
-
2061
)
3
Turner
 
JJ
Morton
 
LM
Linet
 
MS
et al. 
InterLymph hierarchical classification of lymphoid neoplasms for epidemiologic research based on the WHO classification (2008): update and future directions.
Blood
2010
, vol. 
116
 
20
(pg. 
e90
-
e98
)
4
Ekström-Smedby
 
K
Epidemiology and etiology of non-Hodgkin lymphoma–a review.
Acta Oncol
2006
, vol. 
45
 
3
(pg. 
258
-
271
)
5
Martí
 
A
Marcos
 
A
Martinez
 
JA
Obesity and immune function relationships.
Obes Rev
2001
, vol. 
2
 
2
(pg. 
131
-
140
)
6
Chandra
 
RK
Nutrition and the immune system: an introduction.
Am J Clin Nutr
1997
, vol. 
66
 
2
(pg. 
460S
-
463S
)
7
Cross
 
AJ
Lim
 
U
The role of dietary factors in the epidemiology of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Leuk Lymphoma
2006
, vol. 
47
 
12
(pg. 
2477
-
2487
)
8
Skibola
 
CF
Obesity, diet and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2007
, vol. 
16
 
3
(pg. 
392
-
395
)
9
Ward
 
MH
Zahm
 
SH
Weisenburger
 
DD
et al. 
Dietary factors and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Nebraska (United States).
Cancer Causes Control
1994
, vol. 
5
 
5
(pg. 
422
-
432
)
10
Tavani
 
A
Pregnolato
 
A
Negri
 
E
et al. 
Diet and risk of lymphoid neoplasms and soft tissue sarcomas.
Nutr Cancer
1997
, vol. 
27
 
3
(pg. 
256
-
260
)
11
Chang
 
ET
Smedby
 
KE
Zhang
 
SM
et al. 
Dietary factors and risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma in men and women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2005
, vol. 
14
 
2
(pg. 
512
-
520
)
12
Kelemen
 
LE
Cerhan
 
JR
Lim
 
U
et al. 
Vegetables, fruit, and antioxidant-related nutrients and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a National Cancer Institute-Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results population-based case-control study.
Am J Clin Nutr
2006
, vol. 
83
 
6
(pg. 
1401
-
1410
)
13
Chiu
 
BC
Kwon
 
S
Evens
 
AM
Surawicz
 
T
Smith
 
SM
Weisenburger
 
DD
Dietary intake of fruit and vegetables and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Cancer Causes Control
2011
, vol. 
22
 
8
(pg. 
1183
-
1195
)
14
Holtan
 
SG
O'Connor
 
HM
Fredericksen
 
ZS
et al. 
Food-frequency questionnaire-based estimates of total antioxidant capacity and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma [published online ahead of print October 31, 2011].
Int J Cancer
 
15
Zheng
 
T
Holford
 
TR
Leaderer
 
B
et al. 
Diet and nutrient intakes and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in Connecticut women.
Am J Epidemiol
2004
, vol. 
159
 
5
(pg. 
454
-
466
)
16
Talamini
 
R
Polesel
 
J
Montella
 
M
et al. 
Food groups and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a multicenter, case-control study in Italy.
Int J Cancer
2006
, vol. 
118
 
11
(pg. 
2871
-
2876
)
17
Matsuo
 
K
Hamajima
 
N
Hirose
 
K
et al. 
Alcohol, smoking, and dietary status and susceptibility to malignant lymphoma in Japan: results of a hospital-based case-control study at Aichi Cancer Center.
Jpn J Cancer Res
2001
, vol. 
92
 
10
(pg. 
1011
-
1017
)
18
Chang
 
ET
Balter
 
KM
Torrang
 
A
et al. 
Nutrient intake and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Am J Epidemiol
2006
, vol. 
164
 
12
(pg. 
1222
-
1232
)
19
Chiu
 
BC
Cerhan
 
JR
Folsom
 
AR
et al. 
Diet and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in older women.
JAMA
1996
, vol. 
275
 
17
(pg. 
1315
-
1321
)
20
Zhang
 
SM
Hunter
 
DJ
Rosner
 
BA
et al. 
Intakes of fruits, vegetables, and related nutrients and the risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among women.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2000
, vol. 
9
 
5
(pg. 
477
-
485
)
21
Thompson
 
CA
Habermann
 
TM
Wang
 
AH
et al. 
Antioxidant intake from fruits, vegetables and other sources and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: the Iowa Women's Health Study.
Int J Cancer
2010
, vol. 
126
 
4
(pg. 
992
-
1003
)
22
De Stefani
 
E
Fierro
 
L
Barrios
 
E
Ronco
 
A
Tobacco, alcohol, diet and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a case-control study in Uruguay.
Leuk Res
1998
, vol. 
22
 
5
(pg. 
445
-
452
)
23
Purdue
 
MP
Bassani
 
DG
Klar
 
NS
Sloan
 
M
Kreiger
 
N
Dietary factors and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma by histologic subtype: a case-control analysis.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2004
, vol. 
13
 
10
(pg. 
1665
-
1676
)
24
Rohrmann
 
S
Becker
 
N
Linseisen
 
J
et al. 
Fruit and vegetable consumption and lymphoma risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).
Cancer Causes Control
2007
, vol. 
18
 
5
(pg. 
537
-
549
)
25
Chang
 
ET
Canchola
 
AJ
Clarke
 
CA
et al. 
Dietary phytocompounds and risk of lymphoid malignancies in the California Teachers Study cohort.
Cancer Causes Control
2011
, vol. 
22
 
2
(pg. 
237
-
249
)
26
Erber
 
E
Maskarinec
 
G
Gill
 
JK
Park
 
SY
Kolonel
 
LN
Dietary patterns and the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Multiethnic Cohort.
Leuk Lymphoma
2009
, vol. 
50
 
8
(pg. 
1269
-
1275
)
27
Institute of Medicine, Food and Nutrition Board
Dietary reference intakes for vitamin C, vitamin E, selenium, and carotenoids.
Accessed May 11, 2012
Washington, D.C.
National Academies Press
 
28
Murphy
 
MM
Barraj
 
LM
Herman
 
D
Bi
 
X
Cheatham
 
R
Randolph
 
RK
Phytonutrient intake by adults in the United States in relation to fruit and vegetable consumption.
J Am Diet Assoc
2012
, vol. 
112
 
2
(pg. 
222
-
229
)
29
Krinsky
 
NI
Johnson
 
EJ
Carotenoid actions and their relation to health and disease.
Mol Aspects Med
2005
, vol. 
26
 
6
(pg. 
459
-
516
)
30
von Lintig
 
J
Colors with functions: elucidating the biochemical and molecular basis of carotenoid metabolism.
Annu Rev Nutr
2010
, vol. 
30
 (pg. 
35
-
56
)
31
Hughes
 
DA
Dietary carotenoids and human immune function.
Nutrition
2001
, vol. 
17
 
10
(pg. 
823
-
827
)
32
Kolonel
 
LN
Henderson
 
BE
Hankin
 
JH
et al. 
A Multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles: baseline characteristics.
Am J Epidemiol
2000
, vol. 
151
 
4
(pg. 
346
-
357
)
33
Stram
 
DO
Hankin
 
JH
Wilkens
 
LR
et al. 
Calibration of the dietary questionnaire for a Multiethnic Cohort in Hawaii and Los Angeles.
Am J Epidemiol
2000
, vol. 
151
 
4
(pg. 
358
-
370
)
34
Park
 
SY
Wilkens
 
LR
Henning
 
SM
et al. 
Circulating fatty acids and prostate cancer risk in a nested case-control study: the Multiethnic Cohort.
Cancer Causes Control
2009
, vol. 
20
 
2
(pg. 
211
-
223
)
35
Franke
 
AA
Custer
 
LJ
Cooney
 
RV
Synthetic carotenoids as internal standards for plasma micronutrient analyses by high-performance liquid chromatography.
J Chromatogr
1993
, vol. 
614
 
1
(pg. 
43
-
57
)
36
Cooney
 
RV
Franke
 
AA
Hankin
 
JH
et al. 
Seasonal variations in plasma micronutrients and antioxidants.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
1995
, vol. 
4
 
3
(pg. 
207
-
215
)
37
Epplein
 
M
Franke
 
AA
Cooney
 
RV
et al. 
Association of plasma micronutrient levels and urinary isoprostane with risk of lung cancer: the Multiethnic Cohort study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2009
, vol. 
18
 
7
(pg. 
1962
-
1970
)
38
Mickey
 
RM
Greenland
 
S
The impact of confounder selection criteria on effect estimation.
Am J Epidemiol
1989
, vol. 
129
 
1
(pg. 
125
-
137
)
39
Han
 
X
Zheng
 
T
Lan
 
Q
et al. 
Genetic polymorphisms in nitric oxide synthase genes modify the relationship between vegetable and fruit intake and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
2009
, vol. 
18
 
5
(pg. 
1429
-
1438
)
40
Kelemen
 
LE
Wang
 
SS
Lim
 
U
et al. 
Vegetables- and antioxidant-related nutrients, genetic susceptibility, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk.
Cancer Causes Control
2008
, vol. 
19
 
5
(pg. 
491
-
503
)
41
Lee
 
KW
Lee
 
HJ
Biphasic effects of dietary antioxidants on oxidative stress-mediated carcinogenesis.
Mech Ageing Dev
2006
, vol. 
127
 
5
(pg. 
424
-
431
)
42
Meydani
 
SN
Han
 
SN
Wu
 
D
Vitamin E and immune response in the aged: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications.
Immunol Rev
2005
, vol. 
205
 (pg. 
269
-
284
)
43
Chandra
 
RK
Effect of vitamin and trace-element supplementation on immune responses and infection in elderly subjects.
Lancet
1992
, vol. 
340
 
8828
(pg. 
1124
-
1127
)
44
Watzl
 
B
Bub
 
A
Brandstetter
 
BR
Rechkemmer
 
G
Modulation of human T-lymphocyte functions by the consumption of carotenoid-rich vegetables.
Br J Nutr
1999
, vol. 
82
 
5
(pg. 
383
-
389
)
45
Müller
 
H
Bub
 
A
Watzl
 
B
Rechkemmer
 
G
Plasma concentrations of carotenoids in healthy volunteers after intervention with carotenoid-rich foods.
Eur J Nutr
1999
, vol. 
38
 
1
(pg. 
35
-
44
)
46
Block
 
G
Dietrich
 
M
Norkus
 
E
et al. 
Intraindividual variability of plasma antioxidants, markers of oxidative stress, C-reactive protein, cotinine, and other biomarkers.
Epidemiology
2006
, vol. 
17
 
4
(pg. 
404
-
412
)
47
Al-Delaimy
 
WK
Natarajan
 
L
Sun
 
X
Rock
 
CL
Pierce
 
JP
Reliability of plasma carotenoid biomarkers and its relation to study power.
Epidemiology
2008
, vol. 
19
 
2
(pg. 
338
-
344
)
48
Burri
 
BJ
Neidlinger
 
TR
Clifford
 
AJ
Serum carotenoid depletion follows first-order kinetics in healthy adult women fed naturally low carotenoid diets.
J Nutr
2001
, vol. 
131
 
8
(pg. 
2096
-
2100
)
49
Purdue
 
MP
Freedman
 
DM
Gapstur
 
SM
et al. 
Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers.
Am J Epidemiol
2010
, vol. 
172
 
1
(pg. 
58
-
69
)
50
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Second National Report on Biochemical Indicators of Diet and Nutrition in the U.S. Population.
Accessed April 5, 2012
Atlanta, GA
Department of Health and Human Services
 
51
Mayne
 
ST
Cartmel
 
B
Scarmo
 
S
et al. 
Noninvasive assessment of dermal carotenoids as a biomarker of fruit and vegetable intake.
Am J Clin Nutr
2010
, vol. 
92
 
4
(pg. 
794
-
800
)
Sign in via your Institution