Abstract
Abstract 4209
Recurrence of disease remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo allogeneic SCT for AML and MDS. Low-dose azacitidine is currently under investigation in the post-transplant setting with the goal of prolonging disease-free survival and decreasing relapse rates. It is unclear if there is potential pharmacologic interaction between azacitidine and dose-adjusted tacrolimus used to prevent post-transplant graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a clinically relevant question since any resultant tacrolimus under- or over-dosing may lead to increased risk of GVHD or drug toxicity, respectively. We hypothesized that azacitidine does not significantly interact with tacrolimus levels and performed a retrospective analysis to test this hypothesis.
We reviewed tacrolimus daily doses and serum drug levels of 62 AML and MDS patients who received azacitidine maintenance therapy (n=30) or no maintenance therapy (n=32) following allogeneic stem cell transplantation at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2008–2012. Patient characteristics are summarized in the Table. Patients in the maintenance cohort received subcutaneous azacitidine at 32 mg/m2 on days 1–5 repeated every 28 days starting at a median time of post-transplant day +65 (range 43–100). Tacrolimus doses and serum levels were averaged for 28 days for each patient before and after initiation of azacitidine maintenance and at day +66 in the non-maintenance cohort. Differences between the two cohorts in their mean change of tacrolimus doses and serum drug levels were assessed using a Student's t-test.
Mean (SD) oral tacrolimus doses pre- and post-maintenance therapy were 2.61 (2.13) mg daily and 2.44 (2.15) mg daily in the azacitidine group and 2.54 (1.86) mg and 2.23 (1.39) mg daily in the non-azacitidine cohort. This resulted in a mean change in tacrolimus dosing of -0.17 (1.16) mg daily in the azacitidine patients and -0.31 (1.10) mg daily in the non-maintenance group (p=0.62). Mean (SD) serum tacrolimus levels pre- and post-maintenance therapy were 8.07 (1.16) ng/mL and 7.58 (2.32) ng/mL in the azacitidine group and 8.23 (1.49) ng/mL and 7.10 (1.69) ng/mL in patients on no maintenance therapy. This resulted in a mean change in serum tacrolimus levels of -0.49 (2.75) ng/mL in the azacitidine cohort and -1.13 (2.04) ng/mL in the non-maintenance group (p=0.30).
Maintenance azacitidine therapy following allo-SCT for AML and MDS does not appear to affect concurrent tacrolimus dosing or serum drug levels.
. | AZA (N=30) . | No AZA (N=32) . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|
Gender, n (%) | |||
Male | 17 (56.7) | 22 (68.8) | 0.43a |
Female | 13 (43.3) | 10 (31.3) | |
Age at transplant (years) | |||
Mean (SD) | 51.2 (14.5) | 52.5 (14.3) | 0.74b |
Median (range) | 54 (19–72) | 57 (20–70) | |
Diagnosis, n (%) | |||
AML | 26 (86.7) | 26 (81.3) | 0.73a |
MDS | 4 (13.3) | 6 (18.8) | |
Donor type, n (%) | |||
Match unrelated donor | 10 (33.3) | 15 (46.9) | 0.69a |
Match related | 16 (53.3) | 12 (37.5) | |
Mismatch unrelated | 3 (10.0) | 4 (12.5) | |
Haploidentical | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.1) | |
Stem cell source, n (%) | |||
Peripheral blood | 19 (63.3) | 22 (68.8) | 0.68a |
Bone Marrow | 10 (33.3) | 8 (25.0) | |
Cord | 1 (3.3) | 2 (6.3) | |
Conditioning regimen, n (%) | |||
Fludarabine/Busulfan | 15 (50.0) | 15 (46.9) | 1.00a |
Fludarabine/Melphalan | 11 (36.7) | 12 (37.5) | |
Other | 4 (13.3) | 5 (15.6) | |
GVHD prophylaxis, n (%) | |||
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate | 27 (90.0) | 27 (84.4) | 0.71a |
Tacrolimus/Cyclophosphamide/MMF | 1 (3.3) | 3 (9.4) | |
Tacrolimus/MMF | 1 (3.3) | 2 (6.3) | |
Tacrolimus/Cyclophosphamide | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) |
. | AZA (N=30) . | No AZA (N=32) . | p-value . |
---|---|---|---|
Gender, n (%) | |||
Male | 17 (56.7) | 22 (68.8) | 0.43a |
Female | 13 (43.3) | 10 (31.3) | |
Age at transplant (years) | |||
Mean (SD) | 51.2 (14.5) | 52.5 (14.3) | 0.74b |
Median (range) | 54 (19–72) | 57 (20–70) | |
Diagnosis, n (%) | |||
AML | 26 (86.7) | 26 (81.3) | 0.73a |
MDS | 4 (13.3) | 6 (18.8) | |
Donor type, n (%) | |||
Match unrelated donor | 10 (33.3) | 15 (46.9) | 0.69a |
Match related | 16 (53.3) | 12 (37.5) | |
Mismatch unrelated | 3 (10.0) | 4 (12.5) | |
Haploidentical | 1 (3.3) | 1 (3.1) | |
Stem cell source, n (%) | |||
Peripheral blood | 19 (63.3) | 22 (68.8) | 0.68a |
Bone Marrow | 10 (33.3) | 8 (25.0) | |
Cord | 1 (3.3) | 2 (6.3) | |
Conditioning regimen, n (%) | |||
Fludarabine/Busulfan | 15 (50.0) | 15 (46.9) | 1.00a |
Fludarabine/Melphalan | 11 (36.7) | 12 (37.5) | |
Other | 4 (13.3) | 5 (15.6) | |
GVHD prophylaxis, n (%) | |||
Tacrolimus/Methotrexate | 27 (90.0) | 27 (84.4) | 0.71a |
Tacrolimus/Cyclophosphamide/MMF | 1 (3.3) | 3 (9.4) | |
Tacrolimus/MMF | 1 (3.3) | 2 (6.3) | |
Tacrolimus/Cyclophosphamide | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) |
Fisher's exact test,
Student's t-test
Off Label Use: azacitidine: off-label use as maintenance therapy following allogeneic stem cell transplant for MDS/AML. Champlin:Otsuka: Research Funding. De Lima:Celgene: Research Funding.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal