Key Points
Rho-deficient neutrophils are hyperresponsive.
RhoA acts predominantly as a negative regulator of chemotaxis.
Abstract
Neutrophil responses are central to host protection and inflammation. Neutrophil activation follows a 2-step process in which priming amplifies responses to activating stimuli. Priming is essential for life span extension, chemotaxis, and respiratory burst activity. Here we show that the cytoskeletal organizer RhoA suppresses neutrophil priming via formins. Premature granule exocytosis in Rho-deficient neutrophils activated numerous signaling pathways and amplified superoxide generation. Deletion of Rho altered front-to-back coordination by simultaneously increasing uropod elongation, leading edge formation, and random migration. Concomitant negative and positive regulation of β2 integrin–independent and β2 integrin–dependent migration, respectively, reveal Rho as a key decision point in the neutrophil response to discrete chemotactic agents. Although even restricted influx of Rho-deficient hyperactive neutrophils exacerbated lipopolysaccharide-mediated lung injury, deleting Rho in innate immune cells was highly protective in influenza A virus infection. Hence, Rho is a key regulator of disease progression by maintaining neutrophil quiescence and suppressing hyperresponsiveness.
Introduction
Beyond their essential role in acute infections and in modulating the adaptive immune response, neutrophils promote severe inflammation and tissue damage in acute and chronic inflammatory diseases.1,2 For example, neutrophils are recognized as the key cell type in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury (ALI) triggered by bacterial products, chemicals, hyperoxia, high pressure ventilation, or reperfusion, but at the same time their antimicrobial activity is crucial for host defense. Thus fine-tuning neutrophil responses has attracted considerable interest. When recruited to sites of infection or injury, neutrophils undergo discrete changes, termed priming responses, which can be induced by cytokines, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), leukotriene B4, and adhesion to extracellular matrix. Only upon encountering “end-target” signals such as pathogen-derived peptides (fMLF) or complement fragments (C5a) will the fully active state be attained.3 The priming phase is characterized by exocytosis of several granule subsets, thereby increasing surface expression and activity of adhesion molecules, receptors, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase (Nox2-p22phox). Priming is accompanied by distinct phosphorylations and partial oxidase assembly, representing the so-called “ready to go” state, that by itself cannot generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) but markedly augments ROS production upon full neutrophil activation.4 Activated neutrophils also release antimicrobial peptides, myeloperoxidase, cytokines, proteases, and extracellular traps (NETs), thus promoting pathogen destruction as well as vascular permeability and endothelial damage.
Rho family GTPases are key regulators of cytoskeletal organization required for specialized neutrophil functions including adhesion, cell polarization, directional migration, phagocytosis, and microbial killing.5 Gene-targeting studies using myeloid lineage–specific drivers showed that Rac1, Rac2, and Cdc42 are involved in various steps of polarization, integrin-mediated spreading, actin polymerization, chemotaxis, and phagocytosis.6,7 Rac1, Rac2, or Cdc42 deficiency in innate immune cells attenuated migration in vivo.6,8 Moreover, Rac2 is essential for primary granule release and NADPH oxidase activation, both prerequisites for microbial killing.9
The contribution of RhoA, the main Rho isoform in neutrophils, can only be deduced from cell line–based studies, because RhoA deletion is lethal in early embryogenesis. RhoA regulates actin dynamics and contractility through the downstream targets ROCK1/2 and mDia1-3 formins.10 ROCK phosphorylates LIM kinase, MLC phosphatase, and myosin light chain, leading to stabilization of actin filaments and formation of actomyosin bundles, whereas mDia catalyzes actin polymerization and stabilization of microtubules. RhoA knockdown in T cells or PLB-985 cells inhibits both SDF-1α–mediated transendothelial migration and fMLF-induced chemotaxis.11,12 Further, RhoA-mDia signaling has been implicated in CR3- and Fcγ-mediated phagocytosis.13-15
Although the Rho-ROCK pathway is considered a promising target for therapeutic intervention in inflammatory disease, our understanding of Rho proteins as regulators of neutrophil functions remains limited.7,10 To better understand how disruption of Rho signaling will alter neutrophil biology, mice with myeloid lineage–specific RhoA and combined RhoA/RhoB deletion were generated. We show here that RhoA acts as a rheostat suppressing premature neutrophil priming. Moreover, Rho discriminates between chemotactic stimuli, thus acting as a negative and positive regulator of neutrophil recruitment in vitro and in vivo. Rho deficiency in innate immune cells increased neutrophil flux toward β2 integrin–independent stimuli, but limited β2 integrin-dependent neutrophil recruitment. Even without efficient transmigration, Rho-deficient hyperactivated neutrophils exaggerated tissue injury in LPS-induced ALI. In contrast, an increased influx of hyperactivated neutrophils into the lung protected the host from lethal influenza A virus (IAV) challenge.
Methods
Mouse strains
RhoAloxp/loxp, LysMCre/Cre and RhoB−/− strains have been reported16-18 and were used to generate combination strains as indicated in Figure 1A. Age- (8-12 weeks) and gender-matched mice or gender-matched littermates were used. Survival experiments were terminated at a predetermined humane end point. Procedures were approved by the University College Dublin Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and licensed by the Department of Health and Children.
Neutrophil migration in vitro
Neutrophils were purified as described.19 Neutrophils were placed on 3-µm transwell filters coated with 12.5 μg/mL bovine fibronectin for 30 minutes before 10 μM fMLF or 200 ng/mL chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1) in Hank’s Balance Salt Solution was added to the lower chamber. After 1 hour, images of the bottom wells were analyzed using ImageJ software. For certain studies, neutrophils were preincubated with 15 μM Fasudil, 10 μM LIMKi3, 10 μM SMIFH2, 10 μM Y-27632, 50 ng/mL Tat-C3, 2 µM SB203580, 100 nM wortmannin, 5 µM U0126, 10 µg/mL superoxide dismutase (SOD), or 400 U/mL catalase. Three-dimensional migration through Nutragen was performed as described.20 Random migration was recorded on fibronectin-coated glass dishes using an Andor (Olympus) Revolution Spinning disc microscope fitted heated chamber; UPLSAPO 60×/1.35 (oil) objective for uropods and UPLSAPO 20×/0.75 objective for random migration; camera iXonEM+897 EMCCD. Migration of 15 cells per movie was quantified in ImageJ using manual tracking and chemotaxis tools.
Functional assays
Immunophenotyping
Neutrophils (1 × 106) were incubated with purified anti-mouse FcγR (clone 2.4G2) to block binding of the labeled antibodies to FcγR. After incubation for 30 minutes at 4°C, the cells were stained with predetermined optimal concentrations of the respective antibodies.
In vivo peritonitis models
Mice were challenged via intraperitoneal (ip) injection with 2 mL phosphate-buffered saline 4% thioglycollate broth or 500 μl PBS containing either 1 g/kg zymosan A or 107Escherichia coli for 5 hours. Cells in the peritoneal lavage were analyzed by flow cytometry after phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-Ly6G staining.
In vivo lung models
Mice were challenged via intranasal installation (in) with 30 μg/kg CXCL1, 1 mg/kg fMLF, 1 mg/kg LPS, 107E coli, or 106 pfu/kg IAV Hamburg/05/09 (pHH05)24 in PBS. At indicated time points, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was analyzed for cytokines using the multiplex-fluorokine assay (R&D Systems), for NET formation by Sytox Green (5 μM) fluorometry, for type I IFNs, and for virus load as described.25-27 Paraffin-embedded lung sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or modified Carstairs, and visualized with a Leica DFC300X camera and IM50 imaging software.
Statistical analysis
Sample size (n) denotes biological replicates. Statistical analyses were performed as indicated in figure legends using GraphPad Prism, v5.
Results
RhoA deficiency triggers neutrophil priming
Mice with myeloid-specific RhoA deletion, RhoAloxp/loxpLysMcre/cre mice, were viable and healthy, but their neutrophils displayed highly increased RhoB levels. To alleviate potential compensation, RhoAloxp/loxpLysMcre/cre mice were crossed with RhoB−/− mice18 to obtain mice with complete Rho deficiency in the myeloid compartment (RhoA/B dKO), because RhoC protein was not detected (Figure 1A-B). Initially RhoA KO, RhoB KO, and RhoA/B dKO neutrophils and their respective controls were compared, but RhoB-deficient neutrophils resembled wild-type (WT) neutrophils so closely that RhoB KO2 littermates of RhoA/B dKO mice were used as controls when appropriate.
Neutrophils derived from RhoB KO2 or RhoA/B dKO mice were probed for expression and steady-state activation of Cdc42 and Rac, because regulation of related Rho GTPases is often interconnected. No changes in Rac and Cdc42 activity or expression were detected (Figure 1C). Rho signaling to effectors such as mDia1 promotes actin nucleation and filament assembly. Comparison of F-actin generation in RhoB KO2 vs RhoA/B dKO neutrophils revealed reduced F-actin levels at baseline and upon fMLF or CXCL1 stimulation (Figure 1D). F-actin distribution was also altered at baseline by redistributing actin to the periphery instead of localization throughout the cell (Figure 1E, quantification supplemental Figure 1A-C available on the Blood Web site). Both RhoB KO and RhoA/B dKO neutrophils displayed F-actin accumulation at the leading edge and polarization into one dominant pseudopod upon stimulation with either fMLF or CXCL1. Thus RhoA/B dKO neutrophils are capable of polarizing but displayed this phenotype before stimulation (quantification supplemental Figure 1D).
Actin filaments dispersed throughout quiescent neutrophils may restrict access of granules to the plasma membrane. Because the cytoskeleton has been implicated in degranulation,28 the release of myeloperoxidase (MPO) from primary granules and of lactoferrin from secondary granules was determined. Although MPO secretion was not affected by the absence of Rho (supplemental Figure 1E), basal and stimulus-mediated lactoferrin secretion was significantly enhanced (Figure 1F). In addition, p38 MAPK activity has been linked with granule exocytosis.29 Analysis of p38 phosphorylation revealed substantial upregulation of basal p38 activity in RhoA/B dKO neutrophils (Figure 1G). Further, CD62L shedding, indicating neutrophil activation, and the mobilization of secondary granule proteins including the antimicrobial peptide CRAMP or formylpeptide receptor (FPR) to the cell surface were assessed. In quiescent conditions, both CRAMP and FPR cell surface expression was upregulated in RhoA/B dKO neutrophils, whereas a fraction of CD62L was prematurely shed, indicating a stimulus-independent, primed phenotype (Figure 1H). After tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) priming, RhoB KO and RhoA/B dKO neutrophil cell surface expression of these markers was comparable. Treatment of WT neutrophils with several inhibitors of Rho effectors such as ROCK, LIM kinase, or formins, revealed that only SMIFH2, an inhibitor of mDia, augmented granule exocytosis (Figure 1I), suggesting that RhoA signaling controls neutrophil degranulation via formin-mediated actin filament assembly.
RhoA regulates the amplitude of receptor-mediated ROS generation
Neutrophil priming is crucial for amplification of the NADPH oxidase–mediated respiratory burst. Premature mobilization of FPR and the Nox2-p22phox complex will likely lead to increased ROS generation. In neutrophils derived from WT1, WT2, RhoB KO1, and RhoB KO2 mice, prior TNFα priming was required for fMLF-mediated superoxide generation, whereas TNFα or fMLF treatment alone did not trigger significant ROS production (Figure 2A). In contrast, unprimed RhoA KO neutrophils generated superoxide upon fMLF stimulation, which was further amplified by prior TNFα exposure (Figure 2A, first panel). This preactivated phenotype was further enhanced in neutrophils lacking both Rho isoforms. Superoxide levels generated by fMLF-stimulated, unprimed RhoA/B dKO neutrophils were comparable with fully activated neutrophils derived from WT or RhoB KO mice. Exaggerated ROS production in RhoA/B dKO neutrophils was further enhanced when full activation with TNFα and fMLF occurred (Figure 2A, third panel). This effect was independent of the priming agent (eg, LPS; data not shown) or the secondary stimulus used (C5a; supplemental Figure 2A). Inhibition of ROCK with Y-27632 did not mimic the phenotype associated with RhoA/B deficiency (supplemental Figure 2B). Phorbol ester (PMA)-stimulated ROS kinetics in WT, RhoA KO, and RhoA/B dKO neutrophils or neutrophils treated with Y-27632 were comparable, indicating that Rho is not involved in regulating the final steps of NADPH oxidase assembly or activation (Figure 2B and supplemental Figure 2B).
Attachment of neutrophils to matrix resembles migration through tissues. In these conditions, priming occurs by integrin ligation, followed by moderate but continuous ROS production upon exposure to secondary stimuli. Attached RhoA KO neutrophils released, similar to suspension neutrophils, elevated ROS upon fMLF stimulation (Figure 2C). An approximately 100% increase in H2O2 release was observed in RhoA/B dKO vs WT1 or RhoB KO2 neutrophils. Chemoattractants and adhesion trigger the intracellular calcium flux required for neutrophil signaling and ROS generation. No alteration of stimulus-dependent temporal elevation of the cytosolic-free calcium was observed (data not shown).
Premature NADPH oxidase assembly in RhoA/B KO neutrophils
The enhanced superoxide production in Rho-deficient neutrophils suggests altered recruitment and phosphorylation of NADPH oxidase components. Immunoblots revealed augmented translocation of the Nox2-p22phox complex, the phagocyte oxidase component p47phox, and atypical protein kinase Cζ (PKCζ) to the plasma membrane of RhoA/B dKO neutrophils (Figure 2D-E). Phosphorylation-dependent p47phox translocation can be mediated by PKCζ, which targets Ser303/304 and Ser315 in fMLF-stimulated human neutrophils.30 In murine WT neutrophils, the corresponding Ser316 in p47phox was transiently phosphorylated by combined TNFα/fMLF stimulation, whereas Ser329 phosphorylation (Ser328 human p47phox) was sustained (Figure 2F). In RhoA/B dKO neutrophils, fMLF stimulation triggered p47phox Ser316 phosphorylation, which was further enhanced by prior TNFα priming (Figure 2G). TNFα priming by itself did not lead to Ser316 or Ser329 phosphorylation (Figure 2H). PMA-induced p47phox phosphorylation was not altered (Figure 2H), again indicating that only receptor-mediated oxidase assembly was altered by RhoA/B deficiency. MAPK are required for phosphorylation of additional sites on p47phox and p67phox proteins,4 and because both p38 and Erk signaling was markedly enhanced in RhoA/B dKO neutrophils (Figure 1G and Figure 2I), it seems likely that additional phosphorylations on oxidase components occur. Premature Erk activation was solely dependent on RhoA deficiency (supplemental Figure 2C).
Rho activity restricts the Rap/β2-integrin activation complex
Integrins are essential for neutrophil adhesion and directed migration. In RhoA/B dKO neutrophils, augmented cell-surface expression of the integrin β2 subunit (CD18), αM subunit (CD11b), and the integrin-connected adhesion molecule CEACAM-1 was observed (Figure 3A). The cell surface expression of integrin subunits β1 (CD29) or αL (CD11a) was not altered, presumably because both of these molecules are not stored in granules. Binding of the αLβ2 (LFA-1) ligand ICAM1 was elevated in RhoA/B dKO neutrophils, suggesting increased β2-integrin activation (Figure 3B). ICAM1 ligand binding affinity is controlled by inside-out signaling, and in particular by formation of an integrin activation complex that relies on the GTPase Rap.31 Attachment-dependent Rap1 activation was conserved in all neutrophil genotypes, whereas RhoA/B deficiency triggered premature Rap activation (Rap-GTP) in suspension neutrophils (Figure 3C). Translocation of the Rap effector RIAM32 was markedly enhanced in unstimulated and fMLF-stimulated RhoA/B dKO neutrophils (Figure 3D). The reduced expression of the neutrophil semaphorin 7A receptor Plexin-C1, a Rap GTPase-activating protein,33 may be involved in sustained Rap activation (Figure 3E). In addition, cooperation between the Rap-RIAM module and activated p38 (Figure 1G), a key player in αMβ2 (Mac-1) activation,34 likely triggers the increased β2 integrin activation observed in RhoA/B dKO neutrophils.
Increased integrin affinity often correlates with enhanced adhesion. RhoA/B dKO neutrophils and neutrophils treated with the cell-permeable RhoA-C inhibitor Tat-C3 exhibited significantly increased adhesion on fibronectin (Figure 3F-G). Prolonged adhesion/de-adhesion cycles in migrating neutrophils cause the appearance of trailing uropods. Although a transient appearance of elongated uropods was apparent in RhoA/B dKO neutrophils (Figure 3H), their overall unstimulated phenotype was surprisingly characterized by increased leading edge formation and enhanced random migration (Figure 3I, supplemental Figure 1, and supplemental Video 1).
Rho acts as a positive and negative regulator of chemotaxis
RhoA is considered the predominant force of the “backness” program, enabling contraction and forward movement of cells. As expected, preincubation of neutrophils with Tat-C3 reduced fMLF-mediated chemotaxis of WT1 neutrophils by 80% to 90% (Figure 4A). Directed migration of RhoA KO or RhoB KO neutrophils to fMLF was comparable with WT cells. In contrast, chemotaxis of RhoA/B dKO neutrophils toward fMLF was reduced by 50% (Figure 4A), indicating that the presence of either Rho isoform is sufficient for maintaining migration. Tat-C3 treatment of WT1 or RhoB KO neutrophils had no effect on CXCL1-directed chemotaxis, whereas RhoA/B dKO neutrophils displayed accelerated migration (up to fourfold) toward CXCL1 (Figure 4B). The disparity between Tat-C3–mediated Rho inactivation and genetic Rho deletion phenotypes is most likely caused by an inefficiency of short-term Tat-C3 treatment and/or more generalized changes elicited by Rho deficiency. To mimic movement in interstitial tissue, neutrophil chemotaxis through fibrillar collagen I was analyzed.35 In RhoA/B dKO neutrophils, migration toward fMLF was again markedly decreased, whereas CXCL1-induced chemotaxis was augmented (Figure 4C).
Neutrophil migration to different cues is mediated by the dynamic localization of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) product PI(3,4,5)P3 and by p38 and Erk activation. Although PI3K activity is essential for fMLF- and CXCL1-induced migration, p38 signaling is only involved in fMLF-directed chemotaxis.36 RhoB KO neutrophils responded accordingly to inhibitors of PI3K (wortmannin) and p38 (SB203580), whereas p38 signaling in RhoA/B dKO neutrophils seems to be refractory to pharmacologic inhibition (Figure 4D). MEK1/2-Erk signaling, a prerequisite for fMLF- and CXCL1-induced motility (supplemental Figure 3A), was highly upregulated in adherent, fMLF-stimulated RhoA/B dKO neutrophils (Figure 4E). End-target chemoattractants (fMLF, C5a), but not intermediary chemoattractants (CXCL1), trigger NADPH oxidase activation and ROS production in attached neutrophils. To test whether H2O2 feedback signaling, which will inactivate phosphatases,37 affects neutrophil migration, SOD and catalase were added during chemotaxis. Both treatments decreased fMLF-induced chemotaxis in RhoB KO neutrophils but had no effect on RhoA/B dKO neutrophils or on CXCL1-induced chemotaxis (Figure 4D). Similarly, inhibition of Nox2 activity with diphenylene iodonium did not alter chemotaxis of RhoA/B dKO neutrophils (supplemental Figure 3B). Alternatively, enhanced chemotaxis of RhoA/B dKO neutrophils toward CXCL1 could be caused by enhanced deformability. Indeed, comparable migration of RhoB KO and RhoA/B dKO neutrophils was observed when the filter pore size was increased (Figure 4F). Taken together, Rho limits MAPK activity and regulates cytoskeletal shape changes. Both are part of efficient chemotaxis toward end targets but seem dispensable for migration toward intermediary chemoattractants.
Rho deletion promotes chemotaxis in vivo
Commonly, Rho activity has been considered essential for cell migration. Because CXCL1 and its receptor CXCR2 mediate neutrophil chemotaxis in response to many cues, the unexpected increase in CXCL1-mediated migration by RhoA/B dKO neutrophils suggested that in contrast to the prevailing notion, Rho activity may suppress neutrophil migration in vivo. Rapid neutrophil influx into the peritoneum permits quantitative analysis of neutrophil migration. In sterile inflammation induced by thioglycollate, the number of emigrated neutrophils increased up to fourfold in RhoA/B dKO mice compared with RhoB KO2 mice (Figure 5A and supplemental Figure 4A). Neutrophil influx in RhoA KO mice was only slightly augmented, again highlighting that RhoB upregulation can compensate for RhoA deficiency, whereas the phenotype of RhoB KO1 mice resembled WT2 mice. To analyze chemoattractant-induced in vivo migration, pathogen-based models of inflammatory peritonitis were used. Injection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae particles (zymosan) significantly augmented neutrophil influx in RhoA/B dKO mice (Figure 5B). Similarly, injection of E coli into the peritoneum of RhoA RhoB dKO mice replicated the gain in neutrophil transmigration (Figure 5C). Comparison of peritoneal neutrophils derived from RhoB KO and RhoA/B dKO mice after thioglycollate injection revealed that although appearance and attachment of neutrophils was now comparable, fMLF-stimulated ROS production was still elevated (supplemental Figure 4B-E).
Rho deficiency leads to stimulus-specific neutrophil influx into the lung
Neutrophil sequestration in pulmonary capillaries and emigration into the lungs are less dependent on adhesion and matrix degradation than neutrophil emigration from the systemic circulation. Further, the pathways required for neutrophil emigration in response to particular stimuli differ and are classified as either β2 integrin–dependent or –independent. Although fMLF is considered β2 integrin–dependent, CXCL1 acts independently of β2 integrins.38 Neutrophil emigration by intranasal challenge with fMLF or CXCL1 could thus serve as an in vivo model to validate the functionally opposing roles of Rho observed in vitro. In fact, neutrophil flux after exposure to both stimuli mirrored the in vitro chemotaxis results. RhoA/B dKO neutrophils migrated significantly faster into the lungs upon CXCL1 challenge, whereas migration toward fMLF was strongly inhibited (Figure 5D-E). Intranasal infection with E coli recruited neutrophils rapidly into the airways, leading similar to peritoneal challenge, to significantly increased neutrophil influx in RhoA/B dKO mice (Figure 5F). Migration upon LPS challenge is considered β2 integrin–dependent and serves as a model for ALI. Similar to the fMLF challenge, LPS-induced neutrophil recruitment was inhibited in RhoA/B dKO mice (Figure 5G). Because of the extended time course of LPS-mediated lung injury, Rho deficiency in alveolar macrophages could contribute to the phenotype. LPS-stimulated macrophages of all genotypes showed comparable cytokine/chemokine profiles and Cox-2 upregulation (supplemental Figure 5A). The reduced neutrophil influx in LPS-challenged RhoA/B dKO mice did not lead to significant attenuation of lung injury parameters such as BAL protein content, wet-to-dry lung:weight ratio (not shown), or cytokine/chemokine release (Figure 5H-I), but increased MPO activity and NET formation (Figure 5J-K), most likely as a result of the hyperresponsiveness of RhoA/B dKO neutrophils. Myeloid RhoA/B deficiency amplified pulmonary tissue injury, causing hemorrhage, platelet recruitment, and clot formation (Figure 5L-M).
Absence of Rho rescues from lethal IAV infection
In contrast to ALI, resolution of IAV-induced pneumonia relies on an efficient influx of highly activated neutrophils.39 RhoA/B dKO neutrophils possess a hyperresponsive phenotype that may be beneficial in viral infections. The clinical isolate of pandemic 2009H1N1 IAV shows host-specific pathogenicity in mice.40 Intranasal IAV infection caused exaggerated neutrophil influx into the lungs of RhoA/B dKO mice within 24 hours, which was fivefold higher than the influx in RhoB KO2 mice (Figure 6A). These neutrophils were highly activated, leading to increased BAL protein content and MPO release (Figure 6B-C). Two days later, neutrophil counts were still twofold elevated in RhoA/B dKO mice (Figure 6D). Chemokine, cytokine, and type I interferon levels in BAL fluid were moderately augmented (Figure 6E-F). The increase in soluble mediators may be partially caused by virus-triggered alveolar macrophage responses because poly-IC–stimulated RhoA/B dKO macrophages released higher levels of chemokines and cytokines (supplemental Figure 5B). Neutrophils recovered from lungs 72 hours after IAV challenge showed enhanced CRAMP expression (Figure 6G) and a 200% increase of intracellular viral matrix protein 1 (M1) (Figure 6H). Although IAV titers did not correlate with disease outcome in WT mice,24 a significant reduction in virus load was detected in lung tissue obtained from RhoA/B dKO mice (Figure 6I). The time course of IAV infection was then extended to 7 days. Body weight dropped between days 2 and 3 in WT1, RhoB KO2, and RhoA/B dKO mice. However, although RhoA/B dKO mice never lost >10% body weight, WT1 and RhoB KO2 mice continued to not only lose body weight but they also displayed severe respiratory distress and general malaise that required euthanasia between days 3 and 4 (Figure 6J-K). RhoA/B dKO mice showed only intermittent mild disease symptoms and all of the mice survived IAV challenge until day 7, when the experiment was terminated.
Discussion
Targeting neutrophil recruitment to inflammatory sites and their activation state is a principal goal for the development of antiinflammatory therapies. This study shows the intricate connections between neutrophil responses that lead to unexpected outcomes. Signaling pathways under the control of cytoskeletal regulators such as Rho GTPases affect several fundamental processes in a manner that cannot always be deduced from inhibitor studies or other cell types. A case in point is this study, where RhoA maintains neutrophil quiescence, controls priming responses, and discriminates between chemotactic stimuli, acting as negative regulator of β2-independent neutrophil motility. Neutrophil RhoB is expendable, although it can compensate for RhoA to some extent. RhoB was markedly upregulated in RhoA-deficient neutrophils, most likely because of posttranscriptional stabilization.41 Although RhoA deficiency triggered granule exocytosis and elevated ROS generation even in the presence of RhoB upregulation, the phenotype of RhoA/B dKO neutrophils was consistently more severe. Generalized preactivation in Rho-deficient neutrophils led to a complex phenotype. As many as 250 proteins including receptors, integrins, the Nox2-p22phox oxidase complex, GTPases, proteases, antimicrobial peptides, and alarmins will be released upon granule exocytosis.42 Functionally, priming is best characterized as a prerequisite for an efficient oxidative burst.4 RhoA/B dKO neutrophils generated exaggerated levels of superoxide, which can be beneficial or detrimental depending on the disease context.
Activated integrin signaling constitutes another priming response. Formation of the active Rap1-GTP/RIAM module, as observed upon Rho deletion, mediates integrin activation by RIAM-induced talin recruitment,31 leading to increased ICAM1 binding and adhesion. Constitutive Rap1 activity may ensue from CalDAG-GEFI and p38 MAPK signaling,43 because CalDAG-GEFI–deficient neutrophils showed β2 integrin–dependent loss of adhesion and/or from defects in Rap1 GDP hydrolysis. In addition, Rap1 activity can also trigger signaling via Radil or RAPL and may increase Arf6 inactivation by stimulating the GAP ARAP3.44 Although strengthening of adhesive signaling usually triggers decreased motility, RhoA/B dKO neutrophils were highly motile without stimulation.
Directed migration was also increased upon almost all challenges. These observations are not in line with the current paradigm that RhoA is essential for front protrusion and back retraction of migrating cells.45 Neutrophil migration in response to CXCL1, thioglycollate, zymosan particles, E coli, and IAV was strikingly augmented in the absence of Rho proteins, clearly indicating that Rho acts primarily as a negative regulator of migration in vivo. Common to all stimuli, usually restricted by Rho activity, is their β2 integrin independence when triggering neutrophil influx.38,46 β2-integrin involvement in E coli–mediated chemotaxis has been controversial, but more recent studies by Ong and coworkers47 support our hypothesis that RhoA controls β2-dependent and -independent pathways, albeit in a positive or negative manner. Reducing the need for cytoskeletal deformation offset the gain in CXCL1-directed migration, suggesting that RhoA is not essential for gradient sensing but controls structural changes required for deformation. Transmigrating WT neutrophils execute rapid but transient cytoskeletal changes such as F-actin rims.48,49 This neutrophil deformability is spatiotemporally fine-tuned, permitting deformation when passing through pulmonary capillaries, followed by cell stiffening for sequestration. This scenario is difficult to address experimentally because increasing the pore size also reduces the steepness of the chemotactic gradient, which affects velocity by altering concentration and/or localization of PI(3,4,5)P3, lipid mediators, adenosine triphosphate, and alarmins. Moreover, RhoA may restrict integrin-independent actin flow in vivo,50 and further studies will be required to clarify this point.
Therapeutically targeting Rho signaling in innate immune cells has been proposed for ALI. The results of this study suggest that at least in terms of LPS-induced lung damage, this approach will not lead to amelioration of the inflammatory phenotype, even though neutrophil numbers in the lung were substantially reduced. In fact, hyperactivation of RhoA/B dKO neutrophils was critical in propagating injury, possibly by enhanced binding to the endothelial wall and tissue factor activation, initiating platelet accumulation and thrombus formation.51 Thus novel strategies for preventing neutrophil-associated lung injury may need to focus primarily on restricting degranulation. In contrast, features such as nonproductive virus uptake, NET formation, and regulation of dendritic cells and T cells place neutrophils as desirable first responders in viral infections. Endocytosis of viral particles was more efficient in BAL neutrophils derived from IAV-challenged RhoA/B dKO mice, although uptake of fluorescent dextran was comparable in RhoB KO and RhoA/B dKO neutrophils in vitro (data not shown). The prolonged time course of IAV infection will trigger responses from other immune cells, but the immediate influx of activated neutrophils releasing MPO and CRAMP and their increased virus uptake was likely responsible for survival of RhoA/B dKO mice. Importantly, although neutrophils cannot generate infectious viral particles, they can serve as antigen-presenting cells for antiviral CD8+ T cells.52 Because increased influx of activated neutrophils will be highly desirable in IAV or respiratory syncytial virus infections, a direct drug–targeting approach for Rho proteins could be beneficial for resolution of viral lung diseases.
The online version of this article contains a data supplement.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank G. Prendergast and G. Gabriel for critical reagents; and M. Murphy, P. Hanley, M. Tsatmali, and B. Bourke for assistance and discussions.
This work was supported by funding from the Health Research Board and Science Foundation Ireland (U.G.K.); by INSERM, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, and Inflamex (J.E.B.); and by the Danish Research Foundation (C.B.). U.G.K. is the recipient of an Science Foundation Ireland Stokes award.
Authorship
Contribution: R.T.J. and U.G.K. designed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the paper; R.T.J. performed the majority of the experiments; M.S., M.K., and P.H. performed experiments and analyzed data; J.E.-B. developed p47phox antibodies; and C.B. generated the RhoAf/f mice.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Ulla Knaus, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; e-mail: ulla.knaus@ucd.ie.