Abstract
Background: Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) is a cell-surface receptor involving in cell-to-cell adhesion and as well as co-stimulatory molecule involved in T-cell lymphocyte infiltration and activation. In the pre-rituximab era, high level of ICAM-1 was reported to be a prognostic indicator of better clinical outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The value of ICAM-1 expression in the post-rituximab era remains unclear. To investigate the impact of ICAM-1 expression in DLBCL, we conducted a retrospective study in R+CHOP treated patients.
Methods: Patients (N=102) with histologically proven DLBCL treated at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center with available diagnostic biopsy material were identified. Forty-three patients were treated with CHOP and 59 patients with R+CHOP. ICAM-1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). ICAM-1 expression was quantified by staining intensity or percentage of positive cells. Tumors were considered positive when at least 75% of tumor cells expressed ICAM-1. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was plotted by Kaplan-Meier method and curves were compared with the long-rank test in both groups. Correlation between the ICAM-1 expression and clinical variables were tested by Pearson Chi Square test and a two-sided P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Finally, ICAM-1 expression was determined in a panel of rituximab-sensitive (RSCL) and rituximab-resistant lymphoma cell lines (RRCL) by western blot. Correlation of ICAM-1 expression and rituximab anti-tumor activity was determined by standard complement-mediated cytotoxicity (CMC) and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays.
Result: ICAM-1 expressionwas detected in 28 (27.5%) DLBCL patients. The rest of the patients tested negative for ICAM-1 (N=74; 72.5%). Differences in ICAM-1 expression were observed according to cell of origin DLBCL subtype. ICAM-1 expression was higher among germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL (41.4%) vs. non-GCB subtype patients (19.6%, P=0.019). The response rates for R-CHOP and CHOP were, respectively, 89.4% and 77.7% (P=0.409) in ICAM-1 positive patients and 92.5% and 73.5% (p=0.027) in ICAM-1 negative patients. As previously described, ICAM-1 expression was associated with an improved PFS/OS (P=0.03/ P=0.05) in CHOP-treated DLBCL. On the other hand, no differences in PFS/OS were observed between ICAM-1 positive or negative DLBCL patients treated with R+CHOP. The addition of rituximab to CHOP chemotherapy resulted in an improved PFS in ICAM-1 negative DLBCL (P=0.018). On the other hand, the clinical outcome of ICAM-1 positive DLBCL patients treated with CHOP chemotherapy was similar than R+CHOP treated patients. Finally, loss of ICAM-1 expression level was found in our rituximab resistant cell lines, along with reduction of rituximab activity.
Conclusion: Before therituximab era, ICAM-1 low expression correlated with worse PFS and OS. In our retrospective clinical analysis, we found that rituximab significantly improved the overall response rate and PFS in ICAM-1 negative subset patients. Our data also indicated that ICAM-1 expression level was higher in GCB than non-GCB subtypes, and this may contribute to better rituximab response in GCB cell types. Gradually exposed lymphoma cell to rituximab lost ICAM-1 expression and may contribute to the resistance to rituximab and chemotherapy agents. Further investigation of ICAM-1 expression needed to be study to enhance the rituximab therapy in lymphoma.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal