• Daratumumab-based induction/consolidation and maintenance resulted in the deepest and most durable MRD negativity, leading to superior PFS.

  • Daratumumab maintenance provided PFS benefit vs observation, regardless of MRD status or previous induction/consolidation therapy.

Abstract

Previous results from CASSIOPEIA demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity with the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTd) induction/consolidation and with daratumumab maintenance vs observation in transplant-eligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Here, we present long-term MRD status and PFS outcomes after a median follow-up of 80.1 months. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to daratumumab plus VTd (D-VTd) or VTd induction/consolidation; patients remaining on study were rerandomized to daratumumab maintenance or observation for ≤2 years. MRD status was assessed at predefined time points during each study phase. D-VTd improved overall MRD-negativity rates (10–5) after induction (34.6% vs 23.1%) and consolidation (63.7% vs 43.7%) and provided PFS benefit, regardless of postinduction MRD status, vs VTd alone. Daratumumab maintenance improved overall MRD-negativity rates over observation, regardless of induction/consolidation treatment (D-VTd/daratumumab vs D-VTd/observation, 10–5 [77.3% vs 70.7%] and 10–6 [60.7% vs 52.0%]; VTd/daratumumab vs VTd/observation, 10–5 [70.9% vs 51.2%] and 10–6 [48.4% vs 30.7%]) and improved MRD-negativity rates, regardless of risk status, as defined by cytogenetic abnormalities or the revised International Staging System score. Furthermore, daratumumab maintenance provided PFS benefit vs observation, regardless of induction/consolidation treatment and postconsolidation MRD status. D-VTd followed by daratumumab maintenance consistently produced the highest landmark, cumulative, and sustained MRD-negativity rates (10–5 and 10–6), translating to superior long-term PFS outcomes. These results demonstrate that daratumumab-based induction/consolidation followed by daratumumab maintenance resulted in the deepest and most durable MRD negativity, leading to superior PFS outcomes. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02541383.

1.
de Weers
M
,
Tai
YT
,
van der Veer
MS
, et al
.
Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors
.
J Immunol
.
2011
;
186
(
3
):
1840
-
1848
.
2.
Lammerts van Bueren
J
,
Jakobs
D
,
Kaldenhoven
N
, et al
.
Direct in vitro comparison of daratumumab with surrogate analogs of CD38 antibodies MOR03087, SAR650984 and Ab79
.
Blood
.
2014
;
124
(
21
):
3474
.
3.
Overdijk
MB
,
Verploegen
S
,
Bögels
M
, et al
.
Antibody-mediated phagocytosis contributes to the anti-tumor activity of the therapeutic antibody daratumumab in lymphoma and multiple myeloma
.
MAbs
.
2015
;
7
(
2
):
311
-
321
.
4.
Overdijk
MB
,
Jansen
JH
,
Nederend
M
, et al
.
The therapeutic CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab induces programmed cell death via Fcγ receptor-mediated cross-linking
.
J Immunol
.
2016
;
197
(
3
):
807
-
813
.
5.
Krejcik
J
,
Casneuf
T
,
Nijhof
IS
, et al
.
Daratumumab depletes CD38+ immune regulatory cells, promotes T-cell expansion, and skews T-cell repertoire in multiple myeloma
.
Blood
.
2016
;
128
(
3
):
384
-
394
.
6.
Adams
HC III
,
Stevenaert
F
,
Krejcik
J
, et al
.
High-parameter mass cytometry evaluation of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab demonstrates immune modulation as a novel mechanism of action
.
Cytometry A
.
2019
;
95
(
3
):
279
-
289
.
7.
Casneuf
T
,
Adams
HC
,
van de Donk
NWCJ
, et al
.
Deep immune profiling of patients treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab
.
Leukemia
.
2021
;
35
(
2
):
573
-
584
.
8.
Mateos
MV
,
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Cavo
M
, et al
.
Daratumumab plus bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone for untreated myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2018
;
378
(
6
):
518
-
528
.
9.
Mateos
MV
,
Cavo
M
,
Blade
J
, et al
.
Overall survival with daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan, and prednisone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (ALCYONE): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
.
Lancet
.
2020
;
395
(
10218
):
132
-
141
.
10.
Facon
T
,
Kumar
S
,
Plesner
T
, et al
.
Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for untreated myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2019
;
380
(
22
):
2104
-
2115
.
11.
Facon
T
,
Kumar
SK
,
Plesner
T
, et al
.
Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MAIA): overall survival results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2021
;
22
(
11
):
1582
-
1596
.
12.
Moreau
P
,
Attal
M
,
Hulin
C
, et al
.
Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study
.
Lancet
.
2019
;
394
(
10192
):
29
-
38
.
13.
Moreau
P
,
Hulin
C
,
Perrot
A
, et al
.
Maintenance with daratumumab or observation following treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab and autologous stem-cell transplant in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2021
;
22
(
10
):
1378
-
1390
.
14.
Moreau
P
,
Hulin
C
,
Perrot
A
, et al
.
Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab and followed by daratumumab maintenance or observation in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the CASSIOPEIA randomised controlled phase 3 trial
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2024
;
25
(
8
):
1003
-
1014
.
15.
Sonneveld
P
,
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Boccadoro
M
, et al
.
Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2024
;
390
(
4
):
301
-
313
.
16.
DARZALEX® (daratumumab) injection. Package insert
.
Janssen Biotech, Inc
;
2024
.
17.
European Medicines Agency
.
DARZALEX 20 mg/mL concentrate for solution for infusion. Summary of product characteristics
. Accessed 29 October 2024. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/darzalex-epar-product-information_en.pdf.
18.
Landgren
O
,
Prior
TJ
,
Masterson
T
, et al
.
EVIDENCE meta-analysis: evaluating minimal residual disease as an intermediate clinical endpoint for multiple myeloma
.
Blood
.
2024
;
144
(
4
):
359
-
367
.
19.
Lahuerta
JJ
,
Paiva
B
,
Vidriales
MB
, et al
.
Depth of response in multiple myeloma: a pooled analysis of three PETHEMA/GEM clinical trials
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2017
;
35
(
25
):
2900
-
2910
.
20.
Cavo
M
,
San-Miguel
J
,
Usmani
SZ
, et al
.
Prognostic value of minimal residual disease negativity in myeloma: combined analysis of POLLUX, CASTOR, ALCYONE, and MAIA
.
Blood
.
2022
;
139
(
6
):
835
-
844
.
21.
San-Miguel
J
,
Avet-Loiseau
H
,
Paiva
B
, et al
.
Sustained minimal residual disease negativity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and the impact of daratumumab in MAIA and ALCYONE
.
Blood
.
2022
;
139
(
4
):
492
-
501
.
22.
Munshi
NC
,
Avet-Loiseau
H
,
Rawstron
AC
, et al
.
Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis
.
JAMA Oncol
.
2017
;
3
(
1
):
28
-
35
.
23.
Munshi
NC
,
Avet-Loiseau
H
,
Anderson
KC
, et al
.
A large meta-analysis establishes the role of MRD negativity in long-term survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma
.
Blood Adv
.
2020
;
4
(
23
):
5988
-
5999
.
24.
Landgren
O
,
Devlin
S
,
Boulad
M
,
Mailankody
S
.
Role of MRD status in relation to clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a meta-analysis
.
Bone Marrow Transpl
.
2016
;
51
(
12
):
1565
-
1568
.
25.
Perrot
A
,
Lauwers-Cances
V
,
Corre
J
, et al
.
Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma
.
Blood
.
2018
;
132
(
23
):
2456
-
2464
.
26.
International Myeloma Foundation
.
A historic turning point: ODAC unanimously votes in favor of MRD testing as an early endpoint in myeloma clinical trials to support accelerated approvals of new treatments
. Accessed 29 October 2024. https://www.myeloma.org/blog/dr-duries/odac-unanimously-in-favor-mrd-testing-early-endpoint-myeloma.
27.
Engelhardt
M
,
Kortüm
KM
,
Goldschmidt
H
,
Merz
M
.
Functional cure and long-term survival in multiple myeloma: how to challenge the previously impossible
.
Haematologica
.
2024
;
109
(
8
):
2420
-
2435
.
28.
Rodriguez-Otero
P
,
Paiva
B
,
San-Miguel
JF
.
Roadmap to cure multiple myeloma
.
Cancer Treat Rev
.
2021
;
100
:
102284
.
29.
International Myeloma Foundation
.
A deeper understanding of ‘cure’ in multiple myeloma
. Accessed 29 October 2024. https://www.myeloma.org/blog/dr-duries/deeper-understanding-of-cure-in-myeloma#:∼:text=In%20order%20to%20achieve%20a,diseases%20or%20illnesses)%20are%20considered.
30.
Caro
J
,
Al Hadidi
S
,
Usmani
S
,
Yee
AJ
,
Raje
N
,
Davies
FE
.
How to treat high-risk myeloma at diagnosis and relapse
.
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book
.
2021
;
41
:
291
-
309
.
31.
Rajkumar
SV
,
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Palumbo
A
, et al
.
International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma
.
Lancet Oncol
.
2014
;
15
(
12
):
e538
-
e548
.
32.
Durie
BGM
,
Harousseau
JL
,
Miguel
JS
, et al
.
International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma
.
Leukemia
.
2006
;
20
(
9
):
1467
-
1473
.
33.
Rajkumar
SV
,
Harousseau
JL
,
Durie
B
, et al
.
Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1
.
Blood
.
2011
;
117
(
18
):
4691
-
4695
.
34.
Flores-Montero
J
,
Sanoja-Flores
L
,
Paiva
B
, et al
.
Next generation flow for highly sensitive and standardized detection of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma
.
Leukemia
.
2017
;
31
(
10
):
2094
-
2103
.
35.
Voorhees
PM
,
Kaufman
JL
,
Laubach
J
, et al
.
Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial
.
Blood
.
2020
;
136
(
8
):
936
-
945
.
36.
Laubach
J
,
Kaufman
JL
,
Sborov
DW
, et al
. Daratumumab (DARA) plus lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) in patients (pts) with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): updated analysis of GRIFFIN after 24 months of maintenance. Paper presented at:.
American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition
;
11-14 December 2021
. Atlanta, GA.
37.
Voorhees
PM
,
Sborov
DW
,
Laubach
J
, et al
.
Addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (GRIFFIN): final analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial
.
Lancet Haematol
.
2023
;
10
(
10
):
e825
-
e837
.
38.
Sonneveld
P
,
Dimopoulos
MA
,
Boccadoro
M
, et al
.
Phase 3 randomized study of daratumumab (DARA) + bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) versus VRd alone in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT): primary results of the PERSEUS trial [abstract]
.
Blood
.
2023
;
142
(
suppl 2
):
LBA-1
.
39.
Rodríguez-Otero
P
,
Moreau
P
,
Dimopoulos
MA
, et al
. Daratumumab (DARA) + bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd) in transplant-eligible (TE) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): analysis of minimal residual disease (MRD) in the PERSEUS trial. Paper presented at:.
American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting
;
31 May to 4 June 2024
. Chicago, IL.
40.
Badros
AZ
,
Foster
L
,
Anderson
LD
, et al
.
Daratumumab with lenalidomide as maintenance after transplant in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the AURIGA study
.
Blood
.
2025
;
145
(
3
):
300
-
310
.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Sign in via your Institution