Abstract
Background: Large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is characterized by genetic heterogeneity that confers a differential response to therapy. Pre-clinical models and clinical studies of BTK inhibitors (BTKi) in relapsed LBCL suggest preferential activity in ABC DLBCL (Wilson et al. Nat Med 2015). Further, ibrutinib with R-CHOP as frontline therapy is highly active in MCD and N1 genetic subtypes (Wilson et al. Cancer Cell 2021). Acalabrutinib (acala) is a BTKi with activity in LBCL but the full spectrum of untreated tumors that are BTKi-responsive remains unresolved. We designed a response-adapted study of acala as a window prior to frontline LBCL chemotherapy to investigate the molecular profile of BTKi-responsive tumors [NCT04002947].
Methods: Untreated LBCL (including transformed) pts were eligible if age ≥18, ≥stage II, PS ≤2, and adequate organ function. Pts with PMBL, unmeasurable lesions, or CNS disease were excluded. Pts first received acala 100mg twice daily x 14d in a window. All pts then received DA-EPOCH-R or R-CHOP; pts with ≥25% reduction by CT after the window continued acala 100mg BID on D1-10 of each cycle. Tumors were analyzed and molecularly classified by COO, LymphGen, and DZ signature. PET scans were analyzed by 2 radiologists blinded to outcomes. Plasma collected in Streck tubes at baseline, end of C2, at EOT, and during surveillance was analyzed by PhasED-Seq. The primary endpoint was the response (≥25%) rate of acala within LBCL subtypes. Secondary endpoints included safety and PFS/OS within LBCL subtypes.
Results: Of 110 pts screened, 99 enrolled and initiated acala. Median age was 60 (range 26-85) including 25% ≥70y. 60% were male and racial/ethnic groups included White (49%), Black (22%), Hispanic (17%), Asian (10%), and Native American (1%). 47% had IPI score ≥3 and 4% pts had HIV. Pathologic subtypes included 45 (45%) non-GCB DLBCL, 44 (44%) GCB DLBCL, 7 (7%) HGBL with MYC and BCL2, and 3 (3%) T-cell/histiocyte-rich LBCL. Eleven (11%) pts had transformed lymphoma. 98 pts were evaluable for acala response: 49 (50%) pts responded and 49 (50%) had no response. In non-responding pts, 47 (96%) received DA-EPOCH-R and 2 (4%) received R-CHOP. In responding pts, 27 (55%) received R-CHOP + acala while 22 (45%) received DA-EPOCH-R + acala. Acala responses occurred across pathologic subtypes including 20 (43%) GCB DLBCL, 8 (53%) ABC DLBCL, and 5 (83%) unclassified (UC). Both evaluable pts with THRLBCL had dramatic responses to acala. Of 52 pts with GCB/UC DLBCL, 22 (50%) with DZsig- tumors responded versus 2 (25%) with DZsig+. Acala showed responses in all LymphGen subtypes including 7 (100%) MCD/N1, 3 (60%) ST2, 9 (60%) EZB, 1 (50%) A53, 2 (33%) EZB-MYC, 6 (33%) BN2, and 15 (54%) Other. The toxicity of acala + R-chemo was mostly hematologic: G3/G4 neutropenia was seen in 8%/63% cycles of DA-EPOCH-R + acala and 7%/16% of cycles of R-CHOP + acala. G3/G4 thrombocytopenia was seen in 24%/17% of cycles of DA-EPOCH-R + acala and 7%/3% cycles of R-CHOP + acala. ≥G3 non-hematologic toxicities with acala + R-chemo included infection (22%), fatigue (6%), and hypotension (6%). No opportunistic infections occurred and 2 (4%) pts who received acala + R-chemo had atrial fibrillation. After a median follow-up of 39 months, the 2-year PFS/OS of all pts was 84.8% (76-91) and 87.8% (79-93), respectively. No survival difference was observed between acala responders and non-responders with 2-year PFS of 89.1% (76-95) vs 82.7% (68-91)(p=0.62) and 2-year OS of 90.7% (77-96) vs 86.8% (73-94)(p=0.59). By COO, the 2-yr PFS for GCB (N=46) was 93.3% (81-98), ABC (N=15) was 86.2% (55-96), and UC (N=7) was 83.3% (27-98)(p=0.29). Interestingly, pts with GCB tumors that were BTK-responsive had a 2-year PFS of 100% compared to 88.1% (68-96) in pts with GCB tumors that were BTK-resistant (p=0.12). Differences in the tumor microenvironment were not observed using deconvolution approaches, but in vitro experiments identified GCB models that showed decreased NF-kB expression after acala treatment. 2-year PFS for pts with a negative vs positive EOT PET scan was 92% (82-97) compared to 68% (44-83)(p=0.02).
Conclusions: Acala was universally active in MCD/N1 but also had clinical activity across COO and LymphGen genetic subtypes; In vitro experiments suggested a cell intrinsic survival role for BTK in GCB DLBCL. The toxicity profile of acala + R-chemo was safe in pts of all ages. Prognostic utility of interim and EOT MRD will be presented.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal