The Friend virus susceptibility gene 2 (Fv2) controls the polyclonal expansion of infected cells that occurs early during Friend erythroleukemia virus infection. Fv2 has recently been shown to encode a truncated form of the Stk receptor tyrosine kinase (Sf-Stk). This observation, coupled with earlier work, suggested that Sf-Stk drives the expansion of infected cells by forming a complex with the Friend virus envelope glycoprotein, gp55, and the erythropoietin receptor. Fv2 has also been implicated in the control of cell cycling in early erythroid progenitors (erythroid blast-forming units [BFU-Es]). Mouse strains that are homozygous for the resistant allele of Fv2 (Fv2rr) have few actively cycling BFU-Es. In this report, we demonstrate that the control of BFU-E cycling is encoded by a gene linked to, but distinct from, Fv2, and suggest that this gene is the dual-specific protein phosphatase Cdc25A, which regulates the G1- to S-phase transition of the cell cycle. We show that a naturally occurring allele of Cdc25A, which increases Cdc25A phosphatase activity and promotes cell-cycle progression, segregates in mouse strains that exhibit high levels of BFU-E cell cycling. In wild-type mice, this allele of Cdc25A does not overtly affect erythropoiesis; however, when this allele is combined with a mutation of the Kit receptor (KitWV), the anemia of the mice is enhanced. Furthermore, overexpression of Cdc25A in bone marrow cells causes a defect in the BFU-E colony formation. These results suggest that proper regulation of the cell cycle through Cdc25A is required for normal erythropoiesis.

Friend-virus–induced erythroleukemia progresses through 2 characteristic stages. Initially, there is a polyclonal expansion of infected cells, followed by the acquisition of further mutations and the emergence of a malignant clone.1,2 The specificity of Friend virus for the erythroid lineage and the characteristic progression of the Friend erythroleukemia has allowed for the identification of a number of host genes that regulate leukemogenesis after Friend virus infection. One of these host genes, the Friend virus susceptibility gene 2 (Fv2), was first identified by Lilly3 more than 30 years ago as a gene that controlled the expansion of infected cells during the early stage of the disease. Mice homozygous for the resistant allele of Fv2(Fv2rr) are resistant to Friend disease. Even though the virus infects early erythroid progenitors (erythroid blast-forming units [BFU-Es]) that are target cells for Friend virus, the infected cells fail to expand.4 Two hypotheses have been put forward to explain the mechanism of Fv2 action. First, it has been proposed that Fv2 regulates complex formation between the erythropoietin receptor (EpoR) and the virally encoded glycoprotein, gp55, and thereby regulates a mitogenic signal to infected erythroid cells.5,6 Second, Fv2 has been proposed to regulate cell-cycle progression of BFU-E. Mice homozygous for the resistant allele of Fv2, Fv2rr, have few BFU-Es that are actively cycling as measured by their resistance to killing by [3H]thymidine and hydroxyurea.7 In contrast, the BFU-Es from mice homozygous or heterozygous for the sensitive allele of Fv2are actively cycling. Because retroviral infection requires that the target cell be actively cycling for productive infection, the cell-cycling differences between Fv2-sensitive and -resistant mice might explain the resistance to erythroleukemia mediated by Fv2.1 8 

Recently, the Fv2 locus was shown to encode a naturally occurring truncated form of Mst1r (formerly the Stk receptor tyrosine kinase), known as short-form Stk or Sf-Stk.9 The identification of the Sf-Stk receptor as Fv2 is consistent with the possibility that Fv2 functions as a component of the gp55/EpoR complex. However, the genetic linkage mapping that was used to identify Sf-Stk as Fv2 was based solely on scoring the expansion of infected cells in the spleen of infected mice and did not analyze the cell-cycle status of BFU-E.9 10 Although it is clear that Sf-Stk is essential for the expansion of infected cells early during Friend erythroleukemia, it is unclear whether the expression of Sf-Stk inFv2ss is responsible for the observed differences in cell cycling between Fv2rr andFv2ss mice.

In this report we show that the control of BFU-E cell cycling is encoded by a gene linked to, but distinct from, Mst1r/Fv2. We identify a naturally occurring mutation in the cell-cycle regulatory protein phosphatase Cdc25A that segregates with the increased cell cycling of BFU-E observed in Fv2ss mice. This point mutation in the noncatalytic amino-terminal domain of Cdc25A results in increased phosphatase activity. Furthermore, primary mouse embryo fibroblast cultures derived from mice carrying the Cdc25A mutation exhibited increased growth rates and entered S phase on average 1 to 2 hours earlier than congenic control cells, which correlated with an earlier activation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) activity. Although inbred strains of mice that carry the mutant Cdc25A allele exhibited no gross defects in erythropoiesis, when this allele was combined with a mutation in the Kit receptor (KitWv), the anemia ofKitWv/KitWv mice was significantly enhanced. Cell-cycle control and, in particular, the role of Cdc25A in the regulation of erythropoiesis was further demonstrated by the observation that overexpression of either the wild-type or mutant allele of Cdc25A in bone marrow cells had a profound effect on the formation of BFU-E. Based on these results, we propose that an activating mutation in Cdc25A causes the alterations in BFU-E cycling observed in Fv2ss mice and that proper cell-cycle control mediated through Cdc25A is required for normal erythropoiesis.

Testing BFU-E cycling by hydroxyurea sensitivity

C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, and 129P3 (formerly 129/J) mice were purchased from JAX (Bar Harbor, ME). At 10 weeks of age, 5 mice from each strain were injected with hydroxyurea (1 mg/g body weight) in 250 μL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and 5 control mice from each strain were injected with 250 μL PBS. One hour after injection, the mice were killed and bone marrow cells were harvested. Then 1 × 105 cells were plated in Methocult with recombinant cytokines (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) for BFU-E assays, and 1 × 104 cells were plated for erythroid colony-forming unit (CFU-E) assays. Triplicate assays were performed for each mouse. BFU-Es were counted after 7 days, and CFU-Es were counted after 2 days. BFU-Es and CFU-Es were identified using acid benzidine staining. Percentage BFU-E or CFU-E killed by hydroxyurea was calculated as described previously.7 

Infection of mice with Friend virus

Three 10-week-old C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, and 129P3 mice were injected with NB tropic FV-P as previously described.10 Fourteen days after infection, the mice were killed and their spleens were removed, weighed, and compared with the average-weight spleens of 2 uninfected controls.

Isolation of RNA and reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction cloning and sequencing of Cdc25A alleles from C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice

RNA was isolated from bone marrow and kidneys of C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice using Trizol (Gibco-BRL, Grand Island, NY) reagent. cDNA was generated from total RNA using random hexamers as primers and Superscript Reverse Transcriptase (Gibco-BRL). The coding region of Cdc25A was amplified from cDNA samples using primers corresponding 5′ to the translation start site and 3′ just downstream of the TGA stop codon (5′ primer, 5′-GGGATCCCATGGAACTGGGCCCGAG-3′; 3′ primer, 5′-GAAGCTCAGGCTGCTACCATT-3′). Multiple clones of full-length polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments that were derived from C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ kidney and bone marrow cDNA were sequenced.

PCR assay to detect the Cdc25AHis128Gln allele

PCR primers that flanked the mutation in codon 128 were generated so that the presence of the CAC histidine codon would generate an Alw44I restriction site (5′ primer, 5′-AGCCACTCTGATTCTCTAGTGCA-3′; 3′ primer, 5′-GGTCGATGAGGTGAAAGGTGTC-3′; underlined nucleotides in the 5′ primer are mismatches that generate the Alw44I site in the Cdc25A128His allele). DNA was isolated from F2 progeny of the Fv2 mapping backcross and Fv2 congenic strains, as previously described.10 DNA from inbred strains was purchased from the Jackson Laboratory Mouse DNA repository (Bar Harbor, ME). PCR was performed as previously described.10 Amplification conditions for these primers were 1 minute at 94°C, 2 minutes at 62°C, and 1 minute at 72°C for 40 cycles and 7 minutes at 72°C for 1 cycle. Two microliters from a 20-μL PCR reaction was cut withAlw44I in a total reaction volume of 20 μL according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Alw44I digests were run on a 10% acrylamide (19:1) gel.

Expression of GST-Cdc25A128Gln and GST-Cdc25A128His and analysis of phosphatase activity

A clone of human CDC25A fused in-frame to glutathione S-transferase (GST) was obtained from Dr Helen Piwnica-Worms (Washington University, St Louis, MO). The His128Gln mutation was introduced into this clone using the Chameleon Double-Stranded, Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The GST-Cdc25AHis128Gln, GST-Cdc25AWT, and GST proteins were produced as previously described.11 To determine the activity of these protein phosphatases, bacterially expressed GST-CDC25A128His, GST-CDC25A128Gln, or GST alone were incubated in a final volume of 200 μL with 40 mM para-nitrophenyl-phosphate (pNPP), 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) for the indicated time at 30°C. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 1 mL of 0.2 M NaOH, and absorbance at 410 nm was measured.

Cell-cycle analysis of the mouse embryo fibroblast cultures

Mouse embryo fibroblast (MEF) cultures were derived from C57BL/6J embryos and B6.C-H7b/By embryos harvested at day 12.5 of embryogenesis.12 Growth curves were generated by plating 1 × 103 cells/well in 24-well plates. Cells were trypsinized and counted using a Coulter counter at all indicated points in triplicate, and the data presented are representative of 3 independent experiments using MEF cultures derived from independent embryos. Cell-cycle progression was analyzed by starving confluent MEF cultures in low serum (0.1% fetal calf serum [FCS]) for 24 hours. Cells were then trypsinized, split 1:2, and replated in media containing 10% FCS. At the indicated times, cells were trypsinized and harvested and then resuspended in 1 mL ice-cold PBS and fixed with 70% EtOH. Fixed cells were resuspended in 100 μL of 150 mM NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.6, and 900 μL 0.1% Na-citrate, pH 7.6, 10 mM NaCl, was added. Cells were stained by first adding 20 μL RNase A (1 mg/mL) and then adding 20 μL propidium iodide (PI; 1 mg/mL). Cells were stained for 20 minutes at 25°C, and the PI staining was determined by flow cytometry. The percentage of cells in S phase was calculated using the Multicycle (Phoenix Flow Systems, San Diego, CA) program.

Determination of CDK2 histone H1 kinase activity

H1 kinase assays were performed as described.13,14In brief, MEF cultures were grown to confluence in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and 5% FCS. Cells were trypsinized, split 1:3, and replated in media containing 0.1% FCS for 24 hours. The low-serum media were removed, and cells were cultured for the indicated times in media containing 5% serum. For kinase assays, cells were trypsinized at the indicated times, washed once with ice-cold PBS, and resuspended in 1 mL NP40 lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40, 50 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1× protease inhibitors [Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN]). Lysates were sonicated (3 pulses of 5 seconds each on maximum setting) and then incubated for 30 minutes on ice. They were then centrifuged at 13 000 rpm for 15 minutes at 4°C to remove insoluble material. CDK2 was immunoprecipitated using anti-CDK2 antibody (M2) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA) and Protein A Sepharose beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) for 4 to 8 hours at 4°C. H1 kinase assays were performed as described.14 

Generation and analysis of KitWV/KitWV;Cdc25AHis128Glnmice

C57BL/6J-KitWV/+ mice were crossed withB6.C-H7b/By (Cdc25AHis128Gln/His128Gln) mice. F1 mice that were KitWV/+ were intercrossed. KitWV/KitWV F2 progeny were identified by coat color, and their survival times and hematocrit levels were measured.

Infection of bone marrow cells with Cdc25AWT and Cdc25AHis128Gln retroviruses and determination of BFU-E colony-forming ability of infected cells

Human Cdc25A128His and Cdc25A128Gln were cloned in pMSCV-neo as BamH1–EcoR1 fragments to generate pMSCV-Cdc25AWT and pMSCV-Cdc25AHis128Gln. Recombinant virus was generated as previously described.15 Bone marrow was isolated from the femur of an adult BALB/cJ mouse and was resuspended in 750 μL Iscove modified Dulbecco medium (IMDM) and 5% FCS. An equal volume of bone marrow cells (250 μL) was incubated with each viral supernatant supplemented with 10 ng/mL stem cell factor (SCF), 10 ng/mL interleukin-3 (IL-3; both from PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ), and 8 μg/mL polybrene (5 mL total volume; Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 37°C. The next morning, 1 × 105 infected cells were plated in Methocult media (Stem Cell Technologies) containing 3 U/mL EPO, 100 ng/mL SCF, and 1 mg/mL G418 (0.719 mg/mL active ingredient; all 3 a gift from D. Wojchowski, Pennsylvania State University) in triplicate for each virus. After 7 days, BFU-Es were stained in situ using acid benzidine stain.

Control of BFU-E cell cycling is genetically distinct from Fv2-mediated control of Friend erythroleukemia

Cloning of the Fv2 locus demonstrated that Sf-Stk is required for the expansion of infected cells early during the progression of Friend erythroleukemia.9 However, the cloning of Fv2 was based on linkage mapping that used the expansion of infected cells in the spleens of infected mice as a phenotypic readout; thus, the role of Sf-Stk in the regulation of BFU-E cell cycling has not been investigated.9 10 We set out to test whether Sf-Stk was involved in regulating BFU-E cell cycling by testing whether sensitivity to Friend erythroleukemia and altered BFU-E cell cycling were genetically separable.

The original analysis of the differences in BFU-E cell cycling betweenFv2rr and Fv2ss mice was performed using congenic mice that were bred based on their sensitivity to Friend erythroleukemia.7 Thus, if the gene controlling BFU-E cell-cycle status was closely linked to Fv2, it would have been present in the congenic region, and the cosegregation of BFU-E cell cycling with SF-Stk/Fv2 status in these mice would not have constituted proof of genetic identity. To address this problem, we analyzed a variety of inbred mouse strains for their susceptibility to Friend erythroleukemia and for the cycling status of BFU-E. Because inbred strains were not developed based on their susceptibility to Friend virus, we reasoned that we might identify a strain where the 2 traits were separable. We used C57BL/6J mice as theFv2rr and BFU-E out-of-cycle control strain and BALB/cJ mice as the Fv2ss and BFU-E actively cycling control strain. The initial strain tested was 129P3. Although 129P3 mice have been shown to beFv2ss,16 we first confirmed the susceptibility of all 3 strains to Friend erythroleukemia. Ten-week-old 129P3, C57BL/6J, and BALB/cJ mice were infected with the NB–tropic polycythemia-inducing strain of Friend virus. Fourteen days later the mice were assayed for susceptibility by comparing the spleen weights of infected mice with those of uninfected controls (Table1). As expected, C57BL/6J mice were resistant to Friend virus, as exhibited by the limited 1.4-fold increase in spleen size. In contrast, BALB/cJ mice were completely sensitive to Friend virus (20.2-fold increase in spleen size). We also observed sensitivity in the 129P3 mice; however, the expansion of cells in the spleen was not as extensive as that seen in BALB/cJ mice (4.0-fold increase in 129P3 compared with 20.2-fold in the BALB/cJ). Although the increase in spleen size was significantly less than that observed in the BALB/cJ mice, spleens from 129P3 mice were clearly infected as evidenced by macroscopic spleen foci present on some spleens (data not shown).

The percentage of actively cycling BFU-E was measured in the 3 strains by determining the sensitivity of BFU-E to killing by hydroxyurea (Table 1). As expected, BFU-Es from C57BL/6J mice were resistant to killing by hydroxyurea, whereas BALB/cJ BFU-Es were sensitive to hydroxyurea (16.2% killed in C57BL/6J vs 66.5% killed in BALB/cJ). In contrast, 129P3 mice sensitive to Friend erythroleukemia were resistant to hydroxyurea (12.4% of BFU-E killed by hydroxyurea). These results clearly demonstrate that susceptibility to Friend erythroleukemia and control BFU-E cell cycling are genetically separable.

Point mutation in Cdc25A segregates with Fv2ss mouse strains that exhibit altered cell cycling of BFU-E

We reasoned that the gene that controls BFU-E cycling must be closely linked to Fv2 because Fv2sscongenic strains exhibit increased BFU-E cycling.7 Thus, genes that mapped near the Fv2 locus on mouse chromosome 9 or the homologous region on human chromosome 3 would be candidates for the gene that regulates BFU-E cycling. One ideal candidate gene that mapped to this region in human and mouse isCdc25A.17,18,Cdc25A is a member of the Cdc25 family of dual-specific protein phosphatases that regulate cell-cycle transitions by dephosphorylating and activating CDKs.19 Cdc25A functions during the G1- to S-phase transition of the cell cycle. The primary targets for Cdc25A are the CDK2-cyclin E and CDK2-cyclin A complexes, which act to drive the cell from G1 to S phase.19 

If Cdc25A is the Fv2-linked gene that regulates BFU-E cell cycling, then different alleles of Cdc25A should be present in strains that differ in BFU-E cell-cycle status. To determine whether differences in the coding sequence ofCdc25A were responsible for altered BFU-E cycling, we made full-length Cdc25A cDNA clones from RNA isolated from either C57BL/6J (BFU-E out-of-cycle) or BALB/cJ (BFU-E in-cycle) mice. Sequencing of the clones revealed that the coding sequence of the BALB/cJCdc25A gene contained a C to A change in codon 128 that converts a CAC histidine codon (Cdc25A128His) to a CAA glutamine codon (Cdc25A128Gln). This mutation lies in the amino-terminal noncatalytic domain of Cdc25A near the end of a block of 24 amino acids that are absolutely conserved in mouse, human, and rat. Comparison of the sequence of this region in human and rat with sequence from BALB/cJ and C57BL/6J revealed that the C57BL/6J allele, Cdc25A128His, is conserved in human and rat, suggesting that this allele may be the “wild-type” allele (Figure1). 20 21 

Fig. 1.

Alignment of the amino acid sequence of Cdc25A from BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J, rat, and human.

The dark box indicates a domain of 23 amino acids that are identical in mouse, human,20 and rat Cdc25A.21 The position of codon 128 is highlighted within this domain. Below, a portion of the sequence of CDC25B2 is aligned with Cdc25A to demonstrate that the region containing the codon 128 is deleted in CDC25B2.41 

Fig. 1.

Alignment of the amino acid sequence of Cdc25A from BALB/cJ, C57BL/6J, rat, and human.

The dark box indicates a domain of 23 amino acids that are identical in mouse, human,20 and rat Cdc25A.21 The position of codon 128 is highlighted within this domain. Below, a portion of the sequence of CDC25B2 is aligned with Cdc25A to demonstrate that the region containing the codon 128 is deleted in CDC25B2.41 

Close modal

Using this mutation, we developed a PCR-based assay to distinguish between the 2 alleles. We mapped Cdc25A relative toFv2 using a (C3HeB/FeJ × C57BL/6J)F1 × C57BL/6J backcross panel.10 Cdc25A mapped approximately 2 cM distal to Fv2 (Figure2A). At the same time, we scored the presence of this mutation in a panel of DNA samples representing 22 inbred or congenic mouse strains tested for susceptibility to Friend erythroleukemia, including 10 strains that exhibited differences in BFU-E cell-cycle status as measured by sensitivity to hydroxyurea or [3H]thymidine.7 The 6 strains in which BFU-E were out of cycle all contained the Cdc25A128His allele, whereas the 5 strains in which most BFU-Es were in cycle all contained the Cdc25A128Gln allele (Figure 2B). Thus, theCdc25A mutation segregated perfectly with differences in BFU-E cell-cycle status, raising the possibility that theCdc25A128Gln mutation is responsible for the differences in BFU-E cycling rather than Fv2 itself.

Fig. 2.

Linkage mapping of Cdc25A on mouse chromosome 9 and comparison of the segregation of BFU-E cell-cycle status and the 2 alleles of

Cdc25A in inbred and congenic mouse strains. (A) Genetic linkage map of the region of mouse chromosome 9 containingFv2/Stk and Cdc25A. Map distances between adjacent loci are given in cM at the left. The centromere is at the top. The linkage map was generated using a C3HheB/FeJ × C57BL/6J)F1 × C57BL/6J backcross panel of 425 animals.10 The linkage map was constructed using MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0.57 (B) Segregation of BFU-E cell-cycle status and the Cdc25A128His and Cdc25A128Gln alleles in inbred and congenic strains. Inbred and congenic strains were scored for the Cdc25A alleles by PCR. Results are presented in the left-side boxes. BFU-E cycling status of these strains has been determined by resistance to [3H]thymidine or hydroxyurea and is shown in the right-side boxes. At the top are strains shown previously to beFv2rr, and at the bottom are strains shown previously to be Fv2ss. For cell cycling status, strains marked 1 were analyzed by Suzuki and Axelrad7 and strains marked 2 were investigated in this report. B10s.C indicates B10.C-H7b(47N)/Sn; B6s.C, B6.C-H7b/By.

Fig. 2.

Linkage mapping of Cdc25A on mouse chromosome 9 and comparison of the segregation of BFU-E cell-cycle status and the 2 alleles of

Cdc25A in inbred and congenic mouse strains. (A) Genetic linkage map of the region of mouse chromosome 9 containingFv2/Stk and Cdc25A. Map distances between adjacent loci are given in cM at the left. The centromere is at the top. The linkage map was generated using a C3HheB/FeJ × C57BL/6J)F1 × C57BL/6J backcross panel of 425 animals.10 The linkage map was constructed using MAPMAKER/EXP 3.0.57 (B) Segregation of BFU-E cell-cycle status and the Cdc25A128His and Cdc25A128Gln alleles in inbred and congenic strains. Inbred and congenic strains were scored for the Cdc25A alleles by PCR. Results are presented in the left-side boxes. BFU-E cycling status of these strains has been determined by resistance to [3H]thymidine or hydroxyurea and is shown in the right-side boxes. At the top are strains shown previously to beFv2rr, and at the bottom are strains shown previously to be Fv2ss. For cell cycling status, strains marked 1 were analyzed by Suzuki and Axelrad7 and strains marked 2 were investigated in this report. B10s.C indicates B10.C-H7b(47N)/Sn; B6s.C, B6.C-H7b/By.

Close modal

Cdc25AHis128Gln mutation results in increased phosphatase activity

Cdc25A is a positive regulator of the cell cycle. Overexpression of Cdc25A can lead to cell proliferation and transformation.22,23 Thus, mutations that increase Cdc25A activity might lead to increased cell proliferation. Cdc25A and the other family members, Cdc25B and C, are modular proteins. The carboxy-terminal portion of the protein contains the phosphatase domain, and the amino-terminal domain is thought to regulate the activity of the enzyme. Truncation of the amino-terminal domain results in a 3- to 10-fold increase in phosphatase activity, suggesting that this domain may directly inhibit phosphatase activity.24 25 We sought to determine whether the His128Gln mutation, which lies in the amino-terminal regulatory domain, affected the phosphatase activity of Cdc25A. The complete coding domain of human CDC25A128His and CDC25A128Gln were fused in-frame with GST, and the fusion proteins were produced inEscherichia coli. Phosphatase activity of purified fusion proteins was determined by measuring the conversion of para-nitrophenyl phosphate to para-nitrophenol using absorbance at 410 nm. In 3 separate experiments, CDC25A128Gln consistently demonstrated an increase in phosphatase activity (Figure3). These results suggest that a point mutation in the amino-terminal domain of Cdc25A may alter the conformation of the protein, resulting in increased phosphatase activity.

Fig. 3.

Analysis of phosphatase activity of GST-Cdc25A128His and GST-Cdc25A128Gln fusion proteins.

GST fusion proteins were purified and tested for phosphatase activity. Equivalent amounts of GST-CDC25A128His, GST-CDC25A128Gln, and GST were incubated with 40 mM pNPP for the indicated times (see “Materials and methods”). Reactions were stopped, and absorbance at 410 nm was measured. The graph is representative of 3 independent experiments. Each time point was done in triplicate. Data are averages ± SD.

Fig. 3.

Analysis of phosphatase activity of GST-Cdc25A128His and GST-Cdc25A128Gln fusion proteins.

GST fusion proteins were purified and tested for phosphatase activity. Equivalent amounts of GST-CDC25A128His, GST-CDC25A128Gln, and GST were incubated with 40 mM pNPP for the indicated times (see “Materials and methods”). Reactions were stopped, and absorbance at 410 nm was measured. The graph is representative of 3 independent experiments. Each time point was done in triplicate. Data are averages ± SD.

Close modal

Cells expressing Cdc25AHis128Gln exhibit an accelerated cell cycle

The expression of Cdc25A is not limited to erythroid progenitors and is thought to be expressed by all dividing cells. Thus, a mutation that increases Cdc25A phosphatase activity might affect the cell-cycle parameters of many cell types. To determine whether differences inCdc25A alleles affected cell-cycle parameters in a cell population more amenable to experimental analysis than BFU-E, we derived primary MEF cultures from C57BL/6J and the congenic B6.C-H7b/By, which is congenic for the H7 histocompatability locus that is linked to Fv2 andCdc25A. B6.C-H7b/By mice carry the Cdc25A128Gln allele, whereas the C57BL/6J MEFs express the Cdc25A128His allele. Early-passage MEFs of each genotype were plated out, and the cultures were allowed to expand over a 6-day period. The B6.C-H7b/By (Cdc25A128Gln) MEFs consistently expanded at a faster rate than the C57BL/6J(Cdc25A128His) MEFs (Figure4A). These data support the idea that the increased phosphatase activity of Cdc25A128Gln is associated with an increase in cell cycling.

Fig. 4.

Cdc25A128Gln alters the growth characteristics of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs).

MEF cultures were established from C57BL/6J embryos (Cdc25A128His) and the congenic strain, B6.C-H7b/By, embryos (Cdc25A128Gln). (A) Growth analysis of MEF cultures. Initially, 1 × 103 cells were plated out. At the indicated times, cells were counted. Procedures at each time point were performed in duplicate. The graph is representative of 3 independent experiments, each using independently derived MEF cultures. Data are averages ± SD. (B) Analysis of S-phase progression in MEF cultures. Cells were grown to confluence and starved at low serum for 24 hours to synchronize the cells in G0/G1. Cells were then split into new media containing serum and grown for the indicated times. Cells were harvested, fixed, and stained with PI. Stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, and the percentage of cells in S phase was calculated by using the Multicycle (Phoenix Flow Systems) program. The graph is representative of 3 independent experiments using 3 independently derived MEF cultures for each allele. (C) Analysis of CDK2 H1 kinase activity in MEF cultures. Cells were grown in low-serum media to synchronize cells in G0/G1. Cells were then transferred to new media containing serum and grown for the indicated times. The cells were lysed, and CDK2 was immunoprecipitated. Histone H1 kinase activity was measured.13 14 The gel is representative of 2 independent experiments using 2 different independently derived MEF cultures for each allele.

Fig. 4.

Cdc25A128Gln alters the growth characteristics of mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs).

MEF cultures were established from C57BL/6J embryos (Cdc25A128His) and the congenic strain, B6.C-H7b/By, embryos (Cdc25A128Gln). (A) Growth analysis of MEF cultures. Initially, 1 × 103 cells were plated out. At the indicated times, cells were counted. Procedures at each time point were performed in duplicate. The graph is representative of 3 independent experiments, each using independently derived MEF cultures. Data are averages ± SD. (B) Analysis of S-phase progression in MEF cultures. Cells were grown to confluence and starved at low serum for 24 hours to synchronize the cells in G0/G1. Cells were then split into new media containing serum and grown for the indicated times. Cells were harvested, fixed, and stained with PI. Stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry, and the percentage of cells in S phase was calculated by using the Multicycle (Phoenix Flow Systems) program. The graph is representative of 3 independent experiments using 3 independently derived MEF cultures for each allele. (C) Analysis of CDK2 H1 kinase activity in MEF cultures. Cells were grown in low-serum media to synchronize cells in G0/G1. Cells were then transferred to new media containing serum and grown for the indicated times. The cells were lysed, and CDK2 was immunoprecipitated. Histone H1 kinase activity was measured.13 14 The gel is representative of 2 independent experiments using 2 different independently derived MEF cultures for each allele.

Close modal

Cdc25A functions during the G1- to S-phase transition of the cell cycle, acting as a positive regulator of this process.19Thus, Cdc25A alleles with increased phosphatase activity might be expected to shorten the G1 phase and to hasten the entry into S phase of the cell cycle. To test this hypothesis, we used the MEF cultures derived from congenic mouse strains. The cultures were synchronized in G0/G1 using low-serum culture conditions and were transferred to serum-containing medium. The progression of cells into S phase was measured by staining of the cells with PI, followed by flow cytometry to determine DNA content. Between 18 and 24 hours after replating in serum-containing media, the proportion of Cdc25A128Gln cells in S phase was significantly higher than the corresponding fraction from cells carrying the Cdc25A128His allele (Figure 4B). Cdc25A positively regulates the G1- to S-phase transition by dephosphorylating CDK2-cyclin A/E complexes, which leads to an activation of CDK2 activity. Given that MEFs expressing Cdc25A128Gln enter S phase more rapidly than those expressing Cdc25A128His, we tested whether the decrease in G1- to S-phase transition time correlated with an earlier activation of CDK2 in Cdc25A128Gln cells. MEF cells were synchronized in G0/G1 by culturing in low serum and then were switched to serum-containing medium to induce cell-cycle progression. CDK2 was immunoprecipitated, and histone H1 kinase activity was measured. At 12 and 14 hours following the switch to serum-containing media, Cdc25A128Gln cells exhibited increased CDK2 activity when compared with Cdc25A128His cells (Figure 4C). Taken together, these data suggest that the increase in phosphatase activity of the Cdc25A128Gln allele results in a decreased overall cell-cycle time and an increased proliferation rate, correlating with a more rapid activation of CDK2 activity.

Cdc25AHis128Gln enhances the anemia of WV/WV mice

The original observations that demonstrated differences in BFU-E cycling suggest that Cdc25AHis128Gln might have an effect on erythropoiesis.7 However, no significant differences in the number of BFU-Es or any other blood parameters have been observed between C57BL/6J mice and BALB/cJ mice. Thus, any effects of the increased BFU-E cycling must be compensated for by other mechanisms. As with other leaky mutant alleles, the effects of Cdc25AHis128Gln on erythropoiesis may not be apparent except under sensitized conditions. To explore this possibility, we crossed B6.C-H7b/By (Cdc25AHis128Gln) mice with C57BL/6J mice carrying a mutation in the Kit receptor tyrosine kinase (KitWv). Mice homozygous for theKitWv allele of Kit are viable but severely anemic.26 27 F2 progeny were generated that were homozygous for KitWv, and the effects of the different Cdc25A alleles were determined. Mice that were doubly homozygous for KitWv and Cdc25AHis128Gln exhibited significantly lower hematocrits than KitWv/KitWv mice that were either heterozygous or homozygous for the Cdc25A128Hisallele (Table 2). Furthermore, the percentage of pups living longer than 4 weeks was dramatically reduced in the KitWv/KitWv;Cdc25AHis128Gln/His128Gln mice than inKitWv/KitWv mice heterozygous or homozygous for Cdc25A128His (Table 2). Thus, in mice with severe anemia, the increase in Cdc25A activity was associated with enhanced defects in erythropoiesis.

Overexpression of Cdc25A128His or Cdc25A128Gln inhibits BFU-E colony formation

The enhanced anemia observed inKitWv/KitWv mice that were also homozygous for the Cdc25A128Gln allele suggested that, under sensitized conditions, alterations in cell-cycle regulation lead to defects in erythropoiesis. Work inSchizosaccharomyces pombedemonstrated that the overexpression of Cdc25 accelerates the cell cycle and induces cells to enter the S phase prematurely, which is similar to what happens to the phenotype exhibited by the Cdc25A128Gln MEFs.34 We next tested whether alteration of the cell cycle by overexpression of Cdc25A128His or Cdc25A128Gln could affect the ability of bone marrow cells to form BFU-E colonies. Cdc25A128His and Cdc25A128Gln were cloned to the pMSCV-neo retroviral vector, and these constructs were used to generate a virus that was used to infect bone marrow cells. Infected cells were plated in methylcellulose media containing EPO, SCF, and G418, which allowed for the selection of infected cells. Overall, BFU-E colonies were more sensitive than other myeloid colonies (culture colony-forming units [CFU-Cs]). Infection with Cdc25A128His virus resulted in a significant reduction in BFU-E (50% of control, P < .01), whereas the total number of CFU-Cs was not significantly different (Figure5). In contrast, infection with Cdc25A128Gln resulted in an almost total loss of BFU-E and CFU-C (Figure 5). This loss of colony-forming ability was not caused by low Cdc25A128Gln viral titer. Control experiments using MEF cells that measured neoR colony formation showed that the titers of the MSCV-neo control, MSCV-Cdc25A128His, and MSCV-Cdc25A128Gln viruses were approximately equal (data not shown). These results suggest that BFU-Es are more sensitive to alterations in cell-cycle progression than other myeloid colony-forming cells and that the overexpression of Cdc25A128Gln, a mild activating allele of Cdc25A, results in inhibition of erythroid and myeloid differentiation.

Fig. 5.

Overexpression of Cdc25A128His or Cdc25A128Gln decreases the ability of bone marrow cells to form BFU-E.

Bone marrow cells were infected with retroviruses expressing Cdc25A128His, Cdc25A128Gln, or vector control and were plated in methylcellulose media containing EPO, SCF, and G418 to select for infected cells. Colonies were scored 7 days after plating. (A) Overexpression of Cdc25A128His or Cdc25A128Gln significantly decreases the number of BFU-E compared with vector control. *P < .01; **P < .001. (B) Overexpression of Cdc25A128Gln significantly decreases the number of CFU-C. All non–BFU-E colonies were scored as CFU-C. **P < .001. Each bar represents the average of 3 independent experiments.

Fig. 5.

Overexpression of Cdc25A128His or Cdc25A128Gln decreases the ability of bone marrow cells to form BFU-E.

Bone marrow cells were infected with retroviruses expressing Cdc25A128His, Cdc25A128Gln, or vector control and were plated in methylcellulose media containing EPO, SCF, and G418 to select for infected cells. Colonies were scored 7 days after plating. (A) Overexpression of Cdc25A128His or Cdc25A128Gln significantly decreases the number of BFU-E compared with vector control. *P < .01; **P < .001. (B) Overexpression of Cdc25A128Gln significantly decreases the number of CFU-C. All non–BFU-E colonies were scored as CFU-C. **P < .001. Each bar represents the average of 3 independent experiments.

Close modal

Previous work on the Fv2 locus suggested 2 potential mechanisms for the resistance to Friend erythroleukemia inFv2rr mice. One model postulated thatFv2 was a component of the EpoR signaling complex that interferes with the interaction of virally encoded gp55 with the EpoR in Fv2rr mice or that promotes the interaction in Fv2ss mice.5,9 The second model suggested that Fv2 regulates cell cycling of BFU-E, the target cell for Friend virus, such that in Fv2rrmice too few target cells actively cycle for productive infection.1,7 Although the cloning of Fv2demonstrated that it encoded Sf-Stk, a truncated form of the Mst1r receptor tyrosine kinase,9 which supports the first model, this finding does not rule out a role for Sf-Stk in the regulation of BFU-E cell-cycle status. In this report, we have demonstrated that altered cell cycling and susceptibility to erythroleukemia are governed by distinct genes. Furthermore, we have identified a mutation in a gene closely linked to Fv2/Sf-Stk, Cdc25A, which segregates in mouse strains that exhibit altered BFU-E cycling.

Cdc25A is a positive regulator of cell-cycle progression and plays a key role in the transition to the S phase.19 The activity of Cdc25A is tightly regulated at several levels. Expression of theCdc25A gene is inhibited by the Rb/E2F complexes and is induced by both c-Myc and E2F.28-33 Alterations in Cdc25 expression can have profound consequences on the cell cycle. Overexpression of Cdc25 in S pombe induces cells to divide at a faster rate, resulting in a small cell or “wee” phenotype.34 In mammalian cells, overexpression of Cdc25A results in an accelerated G1- to S-phase transition.22 35Both observations are consistent with our findings that the increased phosphatase activity of the Cdc25AHis128Glnallele causes a shortened G1 phase and a faster expansion of cells in culture.

How might the His128Gln mutation affect the enzymatic activity of Cdc25A? In general, the enzymatic activity of the Cdc25 family appears to be regulated through its amino-terminal regulatory domain. This domain contains several phosphorylation sites for different kinases.19,36 Phosphorylation of these sites can positively and negatively regulate Cdc25. Phosphorylation of Cdc25A by cyclin E/CDK2 activates phosphatase activity and represents a positive feedback loop for activation of the enzyme.37 In contrast, the amino-terminus of Cdc25A is phosphorylated by either Chk1 or Chk2 kinase in response to DNA damage, which leads to ubiquitination and degradation by the proteosome.38,39 Phosphorylation by Chk2 occurs at Ser123, which is located in the conserved block of 24 amino acids that contains codon 128.40 Thus, the His128Gln mutation might alter the conformation of the protein and thereby affect the phosphorylation of this site, which in turn could affect the stability and the activity of Cdc25A. In the human homologue of CDC25B, a naturally occurring splice variant, CDC25B2, deletes this conserved region (Figure 1). This variant has increased phosphatase activity when used to rescue the temperature-sensitive allele ofS pombe Cdc25.41 These results, coupled with our observations presented here, suggest that this region of the amino-terminal domain plays a key role in regulating Cdc25A activity in vivo.

The His128Gln mutation in the germline of certain mouse strains causes only a modest increase in phosphatase activity. This small increase in phosphatase activity may be constrained by the fact that normal mouse development must still occur in animals expressing Cdc25AHis128Gln. As discussed above, the overexpression of Cdc25 in S pombe induces premature entry into the cell cycle.34 In a single-cell organism such as S pombe, this disregard for maintaining cell size requirements can lead to an increase in aberrant mitoses.34 In the context of a multicellular organism, high levels of Cdc25A phosphatase activity are incompatible with normal growth and development, as demonstrated by the loss of BFU-E and CFU-C when bone marrow cells are infected with a Cdc25A128Gln virus. Thus, the Cdc25A128Glnallele exhibits only a modest increase in phosphatase activity and, with endogenous expression levels, is compatible with normal development. However, when placed in a sensitized background such as in the KitWv/KitWv anemic background or when overexpressed in bone marrow cells, this allele causes a significant defect in the development of erythroid and myeloid progenitors.

Analysis of tumorigenesis in humans and mice has suggested that Cdc25A and other Cdc25 family members play a role in unregulated cell growth. Overexpression of CDC25A has been observed in several human tumors and is often associated with more aggressive tumors.42-46Furthermore, overexpression of Cdc25A or Cdc25B has been shown to increase susceptibility to tumors in animal models and can transform cells in culture.23,47 48 

The central role of Cdc25A in promoting the G1- to S-phase transition is underscored by the observation that Cdc25A is an essential target of the G1- to S- and the intra–S-phase checkpoints.49,50 In response to DNA damage, CDC25A is rapidly degraded, and S-phase progression is blocked.39 This response is regulated by the Ataxia telangiectasia–mutated (ATM)/ATM-related (ATR) kinases that signal through a Chk1/2 kinase intermediate.50 Chk1/Chk2 phosphorylates Cdc25A, targeting it for degradation. Using Xenopus extracts to reconstitute this checkpoint in vitro, it was shown that the addition of exogenous Cdc25A can override the checkpoint and drive the extract into S phase.51 These results suggest that increased levels of Cdc25A or potentially increased activity of Cdc25A could drive cells through cell-cycle checkpoints, resulting in further mutations. This prediction is borne out in some tumors in humans, when the overexpression of Cdc25A is associated with more aggressive tumors.42,52 53 We have not analyzed whether the progression to leukemia in mice expressing Cdc25AHis128Glnis more rapid than in mice expressing the wild-type version. However, the expansion of infected cells in the spleen during the first 4 days after Friend virus infection occurs 2.7-fold faster in BALB/cJ (Cdc25A128Gln) mice than in 129P3 (Cdc25A128His) mice (R.F.P., unpublished observations, June 1996). Taken together, the observations in human tumors, the role of CDC25A in checkpoint control, and our observations that Cdc25A128Gln-infected cells expand more rapidly, one might predict that Cdc25AHis128Gln would decrease the time necessary to develop leukemia after Friend virus infection.

In wild-type mice, differences in BFU-E cell-cycling status appear to cause no overt erythropoietic phenotypes.7 It appears that the erythropoietic compartment is sufficiently plastic to compensate for any deficiencies caused by the alteration in cell cycling. However, as is the case with other weak mutant alleles, the phenotypic effects of the Cdc25A128Gln mutation become manifest only when placed on a sensitized background of mutations, as inKitWv/KitWv. How might alterations in cell cycling affect erythropoiesis in these mice? The Kit receptor signaling pathway plays a key role in the proliferation and survival of erythroid progenitors.26 The KitWvallele results in a decrease in kinase activity (approximately 15% of wild-type) and is functionally analogous to cells being starved of SCF.54 If Cdc25AHis128Gln drives cells into the cell cycle prematurely, erythroid progenitors may die because they lack sufficient Kit/SCF signal to keep them alive. This explanation seems less likely because the overexpression of Cdc25A128His in bone marrow cells resulted in a similar decrease (50%) in BFU-E colonies regardless of whether a high concentration of SCF (100 ng/mL; Figure 5) or a low concentration of SCF (10 ng/mL; R.F.P., unpublished observations, January 2002) was used. Thus, in these experiments, low levels of Kit receptor signaling did not result in cells more sensitive to alterations in the cell cycle. Alternatively, erythroid differentiation requires progenitor cells to exit the cell cycle and terminally differentiate.55 56 Cdc25AHis128Gln in theKitWv cross or overexpression of either Cdc25A allele in bone marrow cells could interfere with the cell-cycle exit and disrupt normal differentiation.

In summary, we have described a naturally occurring mutation inCdc25A that segregates with altered BFU-E cell-cycle status. These results demonstrate that the differences in BFU-E cell cycling previously ascribed to Fv2 are likely caused by this allele of Cdc25A. This mutation, in the amino-terminal regulatory domain of Cdc25A, has a moderate but discernible effect on Cdc25A phosphatase activity and a significant effect on cell-cycle status. Although this mutation has no discernible phenotypic consequences under normal conditions, the effects are manifest when the mutation is placed on the sensitized KitWv/KitWv mutant background or when either Cdc25A128His or Cdc25A128Gln are overexpressed in bone marrow cells. These results suggest that proper cell-cycle control is required for normal erythropoietic differentiation.

We thank Helen Piwnica-Worms for supplying the Gst-CDC25A plasmid, Pam Correll and Lisa Finkelstein for critically reading the manuscript, Andy Henderson for 293T cells, pMSCV-neo, and pEco plasmids, and Alan Bernstein for his support of the initial phases of this work. E. M. is now a Medical student at Northwestern University Medical School.

Supported by start-up funds from Pennsylvania State University (R.F.P.).

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

1
Ben-David
Y
Bernstein
A
Friend virus-induced erythroleukemia and the multistage nature of cancer.
Cell.
66
1991
831
834
2
Ney
P
D'Andrea
A
Friend erythroleukemia revisited.
Blood.
96
2000
3675
3680
3
Lilly
F
Fv2: identification and location of a second gene governing the spleen focus response to Friend leukemia virus in mice.
J Natl Cancer Inst.
45
1970
163
169
4
Van der Gaag
H
Axelrad
A
Friend virus replication in normal and immunosuppressed C57BL/6 mice.
Virology.
177
1990
837
839
5
Hoatlin
M
Kabat
D
Host-range control of a retroviral disease: Friend erythroleukemia.
Trends Microbiol.
3
1995
51
57
6
Majumdar
M
Cho
C
Fox
M
et al
Mutations in the env gene of Friend spleen focus forming virus overcome Fv2R-mediated resistance to Friend erythroleukemia virus.
J Virol.
66
1992
3652
3660
7
Suzuki
S
Axelrad
A
Fv-2 locus controls the proportion of erythropoietic progenitor cells (BFU-E) synthesizing DNA in normal mice.
Cell.
19
1980
225
236
8
Varmus
H
Padgett
T
Heasley
S
Simon
G
Bishop
J
Cellular functions are required for the synthesis and integration of avian sarcoma virus specific DNA.
Cell.
11
1977
307
319
9
Persons
D
Paulson
R
Loyd
M
et al
Fv2 encodes a truncated form of the Stk receptor tyrosine kinase.
Nat Genet.
23
1999
159
165
10
Paulson
R
Bernstein
A
A genetic linkage map of the mouse chromosome 9 region encompassing the Friend virus susceptibility gene 2 (Fv2).
Mamm Genome.
9
1998
381
384
11
van der Geer
P
Wiley
S
Lai
V
et al
A conserved amino-terminal Shc domain binds to phosphotyrosine motifs in activated receptors and phosphopeptides.
Curr Biol.
5
1995
404
412
12
Cheng
A
Saxton
T
Sakai
R
et al
Mammalian Grb2 regulates multiple steps in embryonic development and malignant transformation.
Cell.
95
1998
793
803
13
Brooks
G
Cyclin-dependent kinases and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors: detection methods and activity measurements.
Methods Mol Biol.
124
2001
161
170
14
Tsubari
M
Taipale
J
Tiihonen
E
Keski-Oja
J
Laiho
M
Hepatocyte growth factor releases mink epithelial cells from transforming growth factor beta1-induced growth arrest by restoring Cdk6 expression and cyclin E-associated Cdk2 activity.
Mol Cell Biol.
19
1999
3654
3663
15
Finkelstein
L
Ney
P
Liu
Q
Paulson
R
Correll
P
Sf-Stk kinase activity and the Grb2 binding site are required for EPO-independent growth of primary erythroblasts infected with Friend virus.
Oncogene.
21
2002
3562
3570
16
Lilly
F
Pincus
T
Genetic control of murine viral leukemogenesis.
Adv Cancer Res.
17
1973
231
277
17
Lock
L
Wickramasinghe
D
Ernst
M
et al
The Cdc25 genes map to mouse chromosomes 2, 9, and 18.
Mamm Genome.
7
1996
771
772
18
Demetrick
D
Beach
D
Chromosome mapping of human CDC25A and CDC25B phosphatases.
Genomics.
18
1993
144
147
19
Nilsson
I
Hoffmann
I
Cell cycle regulation by the Cdc25 phosphatase family.
Prog Cell Cycle Res.
4
2000
107
114
20
Galaktionov
K
Beach
D
Specific activation of cdc25 tyrosine phosphatases by B-type cyclins: evidence for multiple roles of mitotic cyclins.
Cell.
67
1991
1181
1194
21
Jinno
S
Suto
K
Nagata
A
et al
Cdc25A is a novel phosphatase functioning early in the cell cycle.
EMBO J.
13
1994
1549
1556
22
Blomberg
I
Hoffmann
I
Ectopic expression of Cdc25A accelerates the G(1)/S transition and leads to premature activation of cyclin E- and cyclin A-dependent kinases.
Mol Cell Biol.
19
1999
6183
6194
23
Galaktionov
K
Lee
A
Eckstein
J
et al
CDC25 phosphatases as potential human oncogenes.
Science.
269
1995
1575
1577
24
Xu
X
Burke
S
Roles of active site residues and the NH2-terminal domain in the catalysis and substrate binding of human Cdc25.
J Biol Chem.
271
1996
5118
5124
25
Fauman
E
Cogswell
J
Lovejoy
B
et al
Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of the human cell cycle control phosphatase, Cdc25A.
Cell.
93
1998
617
625
26
Paulson
R
Bernstein
A
Receptor tyrosine kinases and the regulation of hematopoiesis.
Semin Immunol.
7
1995
267
277
27
Lyon
M
Rasten
S
Brown
S
Genetic variants and strains of the laboratory mouse. Oxford
1996
Oxford University Press
United Kingdom
28
Chen
X
Prywes
R
Serum-induced expression of the cdc25A gene by relief of E2F-mediated repression.
Mol Cell Biol.
19
1999
4695
4702
29
Galaktionov
K
Chen
X
Beach
D
Cdc25 cell-cycle phosphatase as a target of c-myc.
Nature.
382
1996
511
517
30
Paskind
M
Johnston
C
Epstein
P
et al
Structure and promoter activity of the mouse CDC25A gene.
Mamm Genome.
11
2000
1063
1069
31
Iavarone
A
Massague
J
Repression of the CDK activator Cdc25A and cell-cycle arrest by cytokine TGF-beta in cells lacking the CDK inhibitor p15.
Nature.
387
1997
417
422
32
Iavarone
A
Massague
J
E2F and histone deacetylase mediate transforming growth factor beta repression of cdc25A during keratinocyte cell cycle arrest.
Mol Cell Biol.
19
1999
916
922
33
Tiefenbrun
N
Melamed
D
Levy
N
et al
Alpha interferon suppresses the cyclin D3 and cdc25A genes, leading to a reversible G0-like arrest.
Mol Cell Biol.
16
1996
3934
3944
34
Enoch
T
Nurse
P
Mutation of fission yeast cell cycle control genes abolishes dependence of mitosis on DNA replication.
Cell.
60
1990
665
673
35
Sexl
V
Diehl
J
Sherr
C
et al
A rate limiting function of cdc25A for S phase entry inversely correlates with tyrosine dephosphorylation of Cdk2.
Oncogene.
18
1999
573
582
36
Wegener
S
Hampe
W
Herrmann
D
Schaller
H
Alternative splicing in the regulatory region of the human phosphatases CDC25A and CDC25C.
Eur J Cell Biol.
79
2000
810
815
37
Hoffmann
I
Draetta
G
Karsenti
E
Activation of the phosphatase activity of human cdc25A by a cdk2-cyclin E dependent phosphorylation at the G1/S transition.
EMBO J.
13
1994
4302
4310
38
Bernardi
R
Liebermann
D
Hoffman
B
Cdc25A stability is controlled by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway during cell cycle progression and terminal differentiation.
Oncogene.
19
2000
2447
2454
39
Mailand
N
Falck
J
Lukas
C
et al
Rapid destruction of human Cdc25A in response to DNA damage.
Science.
288
2000
1425
1429
40
Falck
J
Mailand
N
Syljuasen
R
Bartek
J
Lukas
J
The ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A checkpoint pathway guards against radioresistant DNA synthesis.
Nature.
410
2001
842
847
41
Baldin
V
Cans
C
Superti-Furga
G
Ducommun
B
Alternative splicing of human CDC25B tyrosine phosphatase: possible implications for growth control?
Oncogene.
14
1997
2485
2495
42
Broggini
M
Buraggi
G
Brenna
A
et al
Cell cycle-related phosphatases CDC25A and B expression correlates with survival in ovarian cancer patients.
Anticancer Res.
20
2000
4835
4840
43
Cangi
M
Cukor
B
Soung
P
et al
Role of the Cdc25A phosphatase in human breast cancer.
J Clin Invest.
106
2000
753
761
44
Dixon
D
Moyana
T
King
M
Elevated expression of the cdc25A protein phosphatase in colon cancer.
Exp Cell Res.
240
1998
236
243
45
Gasparotto
D
Maestro
R
Piccinin
S
et al
Overexpression of CDC25A and CDC25B in head and neck cancers.
Cancer Res.
57
1997
2366
2368
46
Wu
W
Fan
Y
Kemp
B
Walsh
G
Mao
L
Overexpression of cdc25A and cdc25B is frequent in primary non-small cell lung cancer but is not associated with overexpression of c-myc.
Cancer Res.
58
1998
4082
4085
47
Ma
Z
Chua
S
DeMayo
F
Tsai
S
Induction of mammary gland hyperplasia in transgenic mice over-expressing human Cdc25B.
Oncogene.
18
1999
4564
4576
48
Yao
Y
Slosberg
E
Wang
L
et al
Increased susceptibility to carcinogen-induced mammary tumors in MMTV-Cdc25B transgenic mice.
Oncogene.
18
1999
5159
5166
49
Bartek
J
Lukas
J
Pathways governing G1/S transition and their response to DNA damage.
FEBS Lett.
490
2001
117
122
50
Bartek
J
Lukas
J
Mammalian G1- and S-phase checkpoints in response to DNA damage.
Curr Opin Cell Biol.
13
2001
738
747
51
Costanzo
V
Robertson
K
Ying
C
et al
Reconstitution of an ATM-dependent checkpoint that inhibits chromosomal DNA replication following DNA damage.
Mol Cell.
6
2000
649
659
52
Evans
K
Overexpression of CDC25A associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer [abstract].
Mol Med Today.
6
2000
459
53
Takemasa
I
Yamamoto
H
Sekimoto
M
et al
Overexpression of CDC25B phosphatase as a novel marker of poor prognosis of human colorectal carcinoma.
Cancer Res.
60
2000
3043
3050
54
Nocka
K
Tan
J
Chiu
E
et al
Molecular bases of dominant negative and loss of function mutations at the murine c-kit/white spotting locus: W37, Wv, W41and W.
EMBO J.
9
1990
1805
1813
55
Humbert
P
Rogers
C
Ganiatsas
S
et al
E2F4 is essential for normal erythrocyte maturation and neonatal viability.
Mol Cell.
6
2000
281
291
56
Whyatt
D
Karis
A
Harkes
I
et al
The level of the tissue-specific factor GATA-1 affects the cell-cycle machinery.
Genes Funct.
1
1997
11
24
57
Lander
E
Green
P
Abrahamson
J
et al
MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations.
Genomics.
1
1987
174
181

Author notes

Robert F. Paulson, Department of Veterinary Science, 115 Henning Building, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; e-mail: rfp5@psu.edu.

Sign in via your Institution