Abstract
Because of potential synergy with chemotherapy and non-overlapping toxicity, we investigated the addition of Rituximab or Campath 1-H to the standard myeloablative conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg daily x 2) and total body irradiation (12.0 Gy in four fractions) prior to allogeneic transplantation for ALL. Transplantation was performed on day 0. Rituximab was added if patients’ disease expressed CD20+ > 20% by flow-cytometry. It was administered (375 mg/m2 ) on days −6, −1, +7 and +14. Campath I-H (10 mg daily intravenously, days −6 to −2) was added if patients’ CD20 expression was <20% and CD52 >20%. Thirty-two adult consecutive patients were studied. Eleven were in first remission with poor prognostic features, 11 in 2nd remission, and 10 were ≥ 3rd remission, or in relapse. Twenty-nine patients had B-cell, two had T-cell and one had an undifferentiated phenotyping. The study group included 19 males and 13 females of median age 35 yrs (range, 19–57). Median # of prior chemoregimens received was 2 (range, 1–6). In both groups of patients, prophylaxis for GVHD consisted of a combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate. Pharmacokinetic studies in patients who received Campath I-H showed no detectable level of the antibody one-day prior to- or after the infusion of the donor graft. Median follow-up for survivors was 19 months. Outcomes were:
. | Campath-study group . | Rituximab-study group . | P -value . |
---|---|---|---|
Prior Chemoregimens (range) | 2(1–6) | 2(1–3) | 0.04 |
Donor Type | |||
Matched unrelated | 3(28%) | 8(38%) | 0.2 |
Matched sibling | 7(63%) | 12(57%) | |
Mismatched sibling | 1(9%) | 1(5%) | |
Cell Source | |||
PB | 8(73%) | 11(52%) | 0.2 |
Marrow | 3(27%) | 10(48%) | |
Disease Status | |||
CR1/CR2 | 5(45%) | 17(81%) | 0.05 |
Others | 6(55%) | 4(19%) | |
Median time ANC >500 | 13 | 12 | 0.07 |
(range) | (11–17) | (10–24) | |
Median time Platelets >20K | 13 | 13 | 0.8 |
(range) | (6 – 31) | (7 – 34) | |
Day 100 TRM | 0 | 1(5%) | |
Acute GVHD II–IV (N,% kM) | 2 (18%) | 5 (24%) | 0.7 |
Acute GVHD III–IV (N, % kM) | 0 | 2 (9%) | |
Chronic extensive GVHD (N, cumulative incidence) | 3 (27%) | 9 (54%) | 0.4 |
Overall Survival (18 mos) (95% CI) | 53% (21 – 77) | 52% (26 – 73) | 0.9 |
Disease-free survival (18 mos) (95% CI) | 54% (23 – 75) | 37% (15 – 60) | 0.8 |
. | Campath-study group . | Rituximab-study group . | P -value . |
---|---|---|---|
Prior Chemoregimens (range) | 2(1–6) | 2(1–3) | 0.04 |
Donor Type | |||
Matched unrelated | 3(28%) | 8(38%) | 0.2 |
Matched sibling | 7(63%) | 12(57%) | |
Mismatched sibling | 1(9%) | 1(5%) | |
Cell Source | |||
PB | 8(73%) | 11(52%) | 0.2 |
Marrow | 3(27%) | 10(48%) | |
Disease Status | |||
CR1/CR2 | 5(45%) | 17(81%) | 0.05 |
Others | 6(55%) | 4(19%) | |
Median time ANC >500 | 13 | 12 | 0.07 |
(range) | (11–17) | (10–24) | |
Median time Platelets >20K | 13 | 13 | 0.8 |
(range) | (6 – 31) | (7 – 34) | |
Day 100 TRM | 0 | 1(5%) | |
Acute GVHD II–IV (N,% kM) | 2 (18%) | 5 (24%) | 0.7 |
Acute GVHD III–IV (N, % kM) | 0 | 2 (9%) | |
Chronic extensive GVHD (N, cumulative incidence) | 3 (27%) | 9 (54%) | 0.4 |
Overall Survival (18 mos) (95% CI) | 53% (21 – 77) | 52% (26 – 73) | 0.9 |
Disease-free survival (18 mos) (95% CI) | 54% (23 – 75) | 37% (15 – 60) | 0.8 |
No prognostic factor was found to be of significance for survival, disease-free survival, or relapse. This included: age (<35 vs ≥ 35), source of graft, disease status at transplant, # prior regimens (<2 vs ≥ 2), acute or chronic GVHD, use of Rituximab or Campath. Our results indicate that the addition of Rituximab or Campath I-H in allogeneic transplantation for ALL is safe. There was no delay in engraftment and no added toxicity or risk of mortality. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the impact of this strategy upon survival and relapse.
Author notes
Corresponding author