Abstract
Because of potential synergy with chemotherapy and non-overlapping toxicity, we investigated the addition of Rituximab or Campath 1-H to the standard myeloablative conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide (60 mg/kg daily x 2) and total body irradiation (12.0 Gy in four fractions) prior to allogeneic transplantation for ALL. Transplantation was performed on day 0. Rituximab was added if patients’ disease expressed CD20+ > 20% by flow-cytometry. It was administered (375 mg/m2 ) on days −6, −1, +7 and +14. Campath I-H (10 mg daily intravenously, days −6 to −2) was added if patients’ CD20 expression was <20% and CD52 >20%. Thirty-two adult consecutive patients were studied. Eleven were in first remission with poor prognostic features, 11 in 2nd remission, and 10 were ≥ 3rd remission, or in relapse. Twenty-nine patients had B-cell, two had T-cell and one had an undifferentiated phenotyping. The study group included 19 males and 13 females of median age 35 yrs (range, 19–57). Median # of prior chemoregimens received was 2 (range, 1–6). In both groups of patients, prophylaxis for GVHD consisted of a combination of tacrolimus and methotrexate. Pharmacokinetic studies in patients who received Campath I-H showed no detectable level of the antibody one-day prior to- or after the infusion of the donor graft. Median follow-up for survivors was 19 months. Outcomes were:
. | Campath-study group . | Rituximab-study group . | P -value . |
---|---|---|---|
Prior Chemoregimens (range) | 2(1–6) | 2(1–3) | 0.04 |
Donor Type | |||
Matched unrelated | 3(28%) | 8(38%) | 0.2 |
Matched sibling | 7(63%) | 12(57%) | |
Mismatched sibling | 1(9%) | 1(5%) | |
Cell Source | |||
PB | 8(73%) | 11(52%) | 0.2 |
Marrow | 3(27%) | 10(48%) | |
Disease Status | |||
CR1/CR2 | 5(45%) | 17(81%) | 0.05 |
Others | 6(55%) | 4(19%) | |
Median time ANC >500 | 13 | 12 | 0.07 |
(range) | (11–17) | (10–24) | |
Median time Platelets >20K | 13 | 13 | 0.8 |
(range) | (6 – 31) | (7 – 34) | |
Day 100 TRM | 0 | 1(5%) | |
Acute GVHD II–IV (N,% kM) | 2 (18%) | 5 (24%) | 0.7 |
Acute GVHD III–IV (N, % kM) | 0 | 2 (9%) | |
Chronic extensive GVHD (N, cumulative incidence) | 3 (27%) | 9 (54%) | 0.4 |
Overall Survival (18 mos) (95% CI) | 53% (21 – 77) | 52% (26 – 73) | 0.9 |
Disease-free survival (18 mos) (95% CI) | 54% (23 – 75) | 37% (15 – 60) | 0.8 |
. | Campath-study group . | Rituximab-study group . | P -value . |
---|---|---|---|
Prior Chemoregimens (range) | 2(1–6) | 2(1–3) | 0.04 |
Donor Type | |||
Matched unrelated | 3(28%) | 8(38%) | 0.2 |
Matched sibling | 7(63%) | 12(57%) | |
Mismatched sibling | 1(9%) | 1(5%) | |
Cell Source | |||
PB | 8(73%) | 11(52%) | 0.2 |
Marrow | 3(27%) | 10(48%) | |
Disease Status | |||
CR1/CR2 | 5(45%) | 17(81%) | 0.05 |
Others | 6(55%) | 4(19%) | |
Median time ANC >500 | 13 | 12 | 0.07 |
(range) | (11–17) | (10–24) | |
Median time Platelets >20K | 13 | 13 | 0.8 |
(range) | (6 – 31) | (7 – 34) | |
Day 100 TRM | 0 | 1(5%) | |
Acute GVHD II–IV (N,% kM) | 2 (18%) | 5 (24%) | 0.7 |
Acute GVHD III–IV (N, % kM) | 0 | 2 (9%) | |
Chronic extensive GVHD (N, cumulative incidence) | 3 (27%) | 9 (54%) | 0.4 |
Overall Survival (18 mos) (95% CI) | 53% (21 – 77) | 52% (26 – 73) | 0.9 |
Disease-free survival (18 mos) (95% CI) | 54% (23 – 75) | 37% (15 – 60) | 0.8 |
No prognostic factor was found to be of significance for survival, disease-free survival, or relapse. This included: age (<35 vs ≥ 35), source of graft, disease status at transplant, # prior regimens (<2 vs ≥ 2), acute or chronic GVHD, use of Rituximab or Campath. Our results indicate that the addition of Rituximab or Campath I-H in allogeneic transplantation for ALL is safe. There was no delay in engraftment and no added toxicity or risk of mortality. Longer follow-up is needed to evaluate the impact of this strategy upon survival and relapse.
Author notes
Corresponding author
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal