Abstract
Background: Achieving a cytogenetic (CG) response or a molecular response after imatinib therapy has been associated with improved event-free (EFS) and transformation-free survival (TFS). It is unclear whether achieving these responses earlier confers an advantage. A recent update of the IRIS trial suggests that achieving a major CG response (MCyR) at 12, 18 or 24 months (mo) confers a similar TFS advantage. Another report (
Methods: We analyzed the risks of improving the CG response vs progressing for pts not in CCyR at different times to determine whether early responses confer an advantage. 258 pts with CML CP treated with IM were analyzed. Progression was defined as transformation to AP or BP, loss of CHR or major CG response, or a doubling of the white cell count to more than 20x109/L.
Results: After 3 mo of IM therapy, 77 (74%) of 104 assessable pts for CG response had a CCyR whereas 17 (16%) progressed. These differences were consistently significant at 6 and 12 mo (p=0.04) (Table 1).
We then analyzed the long term risk of progression vs the probability of achieving CCyR according to the molecular response at different time points (Table 2).
Patients with Bcr-Abl/Abl transcript levels >1–10 after 3 mo of therapy had a 92% probability of achieving CCyR with continued therapy, similar to the 98% for those with ≤1. However, they have a significantly higher risk of eventual progression that is more similar to that of pts with values of >10. The risk of progression increases to 23% if transcript levels >10 at 6 mo.
Conclusion: These results suggest that while the risk of progression may be similar for pts who achieve a CCyR regardless of the time at which that is attained, those who fail to obtain a CCyR within the first 12 mo of IM therapy have higher rates of disease progression. This risk is discernible as early as 3 mo into IM therapy and may provide a rationale for therapies that induce higher rates of early molecular response (e.g. high-dose imatinib, new tyrosine kinase inhibitors).
Time on imatinib . | No. not in CCyR . | No. with eventual outcome with continued therapy (%) . | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | CCyR . | Progression . | p value . |
3 months | 104 | 77 (74) | 17 (16) | |
6 months | 47 | 28 (60) | 12 (26) | 0.04 |
12 months | 26 | 16 (62) | 8 (31) |
Time on imatinib . | No. not in CCyR . | No. with eventual outcome with continued therapy (%) . | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|
. | . | CCyR . | Progression . | p value . |
3 months | 104 | 77 (74) | 17 (16) | |
6 months | 47 | 28 (60) | 12 (26) | 0.04 |
12 months | 26 | 16 (62) | 8 (31) |
. | . | . | % Probability . | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months . | %Bcr-Abl/Abl . | No. . | CCyR . | Progression . | p value . |
≤ 1 | 87 | 98 | 2 | ||
3 | > 1–10 | 76 | 92 | 11 | 0.04 |
> 10 | 30 | 67 | 13 | ||
≤ 1 | 140 | 99 | 4 | ||
6 | > 1–10 | 34 | 91 | 9 | 0.005 |
> 10 | 13 | 62 | 23 |
. | . | . | % Probability . | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Months . | %Bcr-Abl/Abl . | No. . | CCyR . | Progression . | p value . |
≤ 1 | 87 | 98 | 2 | ||
3 | > 1–10 | 76 | 92 | 11 | 0.04 |
> 10 | 30 | 67 | 13 | ||
≤ 1 | 140 | 99 | 4 | ||
6 | > 1–10 | 34 | 91 | 9 | 0.005 |
> 10 | 13 | 62 | 23 |
Disclosure: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author notes
Corresponding author