Abstract 4712

The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays a major role in cell homeostasis in normal and neoplastic states. Expression and function of the UPS system vary with the specific characteristics of individual cell types, suggesting that determination of UPS “signatures” could be useful in identifying various cell populations. Since direct analysis of cancer cells is often problematic, even in hematologic diseases, we explored the potential of using UPS signatures in plasma to differentiate between various leukemias. We first analyzed plasma UPS profiles of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n=111), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL; n=29), advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n=20), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; n=118), or chronic myeloid leukemia (CML; n=128; 46 in accelerated/blast crisis [ACC/BL], 82 in chronic phase), and 85 healthy control subjects. Plasma levels of proteasome, ubiquitin (poly-ubiquitin), and the 3 proteasome enzymatic activities (chymotrypsin-like [Ch-L], caspase-like [Cas-L], trypsin-like [Tr-L]) were measured. Specific activities were calculated by normalizing each of the 3 enzyme activities to the levels of proteasome protein in plasma (Ch-L/p, Cas-L/p, and Tr-L/p). These 8 variables were used in multivariate logistic regression models to differentiate between leukemic processes. UPS signatures provided clear differentiation between patients with a leukemic process and normal controls (AUC=0.991), using 6 different variables (Tr-L/P, Ch-L, Ch-L/p, Cas-L, Cas-L/P, ubiquitin). Distinguishing between acute (AML, ALL, MDS) and chronic (CML, CLL) processes was less efficient (AUC=0.853 using Tr-L, Tr-L/P, Cas-L/P, Ch-L/P, proteasome, Ch-L), likely due to the high proportion (36%) of CML patients in ACC/BL phase. However, UPS signatures generally yielded powerful differentiation between individual leukemias (Table). MDS was not well differentiated from AML (AUC=0.791), reflecting the significant biological overlap of these diseases. These data support the potential usefulness of the UPS profile to aid in the differential diagnosis of various leukemias.

ComparisonAnalytesN (Case/Control)AUC
MDS vs    
Normal PS, UBT, C-L, Tr-L, C-LP Ch-P 105 (20/85) 0.98 
ALL PS, UBT, Tr-L, C-LP 49 (20/29) 0.9845 
AML PS, UBT, Ch-L, Tr-L, C-LP, Ch-LP, Tr-L/P 131 (20/111) 0.791 
CLL C-L/P, Ch-LP 163 (27/136) 0.9909 
CML UBT, C-LP, Tr-L 147 (20/127) 0.9496 
CML (Chronic) UBT, C-LP, Tr-L, Tr-L/P 101 (20/81) 0.9608 
CML (ACC/BL) UBT, C-LP, Tr-L, Tr-LP, Ch-L 66 (20/46) 0.9516 
AML vs    
Normal UBT, C-L, Tr-L, Tr-LP, Ch-LP 196 (111/85) 0.9884 
ALL C-LP, Ch-LP, UBT, Ch-LP, PS 140 (111/29) 0.9503 
CLL C-LP, Ch-LP 283 (147/136) 0.9835 
CML Tr-LP, Tr-L, UBT, C-LP, C-L, Ch-LP 238 (111/127) 0.8301 
CML (Chronic) Tr-LP, Tr-L, UBT, C-LP, Ch-LP, PS 192 (111/81) 0.8396 
CML (ACC/BL) Tr-LP, Tr-L, UBT, C-LP, Ch-LP, C-L 157 (111/46) 0.8239 
ALL vs    
Normal UBT, Tr-L 114 (29/85) 0.9984 
CLL UBT, Tr-L, Tr-LP, Ch-L, Ch-LP, C-LP 147 (29/118) 0.9031 
CML no Tr-LP 156 (29/127) 0.9005 
CML (Chronic) no Tr-L 110 (29/81) 0.9264 
CML (ACC/BL) no Tr-L 75 (29/46) 0.8909 
CLL vs    
Normal C-L/P, Ch-L, UBT 203 (118/85) 0.9978 
CML C-LP, C-L, Ch-LP, Tr-L, UBT 245 (118/127) 0.9746 
CML (Chronic) Cas-LP, C-L, Ch-LP, Tr-L UBT 199 (118/81) 0.9749 
CML (ACC/BL) C-LP, C-L, Ch-LP, Tr-L, UBT 164 (118/46) 0.9746 
CML vs Normal UBT, Tr-L 212 (127/85) 0.9986 
ComparisonAnalytesN (Case/Control)AUC
MDS vs    
Normal PS, UBT, C-L, Tr-L, C-LP Ch-P 105 (20/85) 0.98 
ALL PS, UBT, Tr-L, C-LP 49 (20/29) 0.9845 
AML PS, UBT, Ch-L, Tr-L, C-LP, Ch-LP, Tr-L/P 131 (20/111) 0.791 
CLL C-L/P, Ch-LP 163 (27/136) 0.9909 
CML UBT, C-LP, Tr-L 147 (20/127) 0.9496 
CML (Chronic) UBT, C-LP, Tr-L, Tr-L/P 101 (20/81) 0.9608 
CML (ACC/BL) UBT, C-LP, Tr-L, Tr-LP, Ch-L 66 (20/46) 0.9516 
AML vs    
Normal UBT, C-L, Tr-L, Tr-LP, Ch-LP 196 (111/85) 0.9884 
ALL C-LP, Ch-LP, UBT, Ch-LP, PS 140 (111/29) 0.9503 
CLL C-LP, Ch-LP 283 (147/136) 0.9835 
CML Tr-LP, Tr-L, UBT, C-LP, C-L, Ch-LP 238 (111/127) 0.8301 
CML (Chronic) Tr-LP, Tr-L, UBT, C-LP, Ch-LP, PS 192 (111/81) 0.8396 
CML (ACC/BL) Tr-LP, Tr-L, UBT, C-LP, Ch-LP, C-L 157 (111/46) 0.8239 
ALL vs    
Normal UBT, Tr-L 114 (29/85) 0.9984 
CLL UBT, Tr-L, Tr-LP, Ch-L, Ch-LP, C-LP 147 (29/118) 0.9031 
CML no Tr-LP 156 (29/127) 0.9005 
CML (Chronic) no Tr-L 110 (29/81) 0.9264 
CML (ACC/BL) no Tr-L 75 (29/46) 0.8909 
CLL vs    
Normal C-L/P, Ch-L, UBT 203 (118/85) 0.9978 
CML C-LP, C-L, Ch-LP, Tr-L, UBT 245 (118/127) 0.9746 
CML (Chronic) Cas-LP, C-L, Ch-LP, Tr-L UBT 199 (118/81) 0.9749 
CML (ACC/BL) C-LP, C-L, Ch-LP, Tr-L, UBT 164 (118/46) 0.9746 
CML vs Normal UBT, Tr-L 212 (127/85) 0.9986 

Abbreviation: PS=proteasome protein

Disclosures:

No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution