Abstract 2072

Introduction:

Many randomized control trials demonstrated that HDT-ASCT is superior to conventional therapies in myeloma patients and prolongs progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (Attal M, 1996, Childs JA, 2003). However, in treating a malignancy with a median age of diagnosis of 69 years, the majority of the patients will not be eligible for this beneficial approach if a nominal numerical age cut-off (<65 years) is followed based on the assumption that elderly patients cannot tolerate HDT-ASCT; nor will they be eligible for clinical trials involving HDT-ASCT if stringent age-restricted inclusion criteria are incorporated. Therefore, we have evaluated if the elderly patients benefit from HDT-ASCT.

Methods:

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registry data (www.seer.cancer.gov) as our comparator (reflects 28% of the US population);to provide information on incidence, prevalence and survival from 1973–2009. The data from an institutional cohort (IC) is obtained from the records of patients that underwent HDT-ASCT from January 2000 to January 2012. We used IBM SPSS version 20 to generate the Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Results:

Of the 6,571,117 malignant cases listed in SEER registry, a total of 74,826 cases (1.1%) of multiple myeloma (ICD-03 code 9732) were identified (39735 males and 35091 females). Median age of the patients is 70 years. Among these patients 48,988 patients (65%) are over the age of 65. A total of 901 myeloma patients underwent HDT-ASCT from IC during the evaluable period and 167 patients (19%) were over the age of 65. The median survival for each subset is listed in Table 1. Both male and female WCI-ASCT myeloma patientshad prolonged OS compared to the SEER myeloma patients, despite the difference in magnitude of advantage in IC-ASCT male patients vs. female patients. Both white and black patients, as well as patients undergoing HDT-ASCT across all age subgroups had a significant survival advantage.

Conclusions:

In each subgroup, by the decade of diagnosis, gender, race, age subsets we have consistently demonstrated a significant survival benefit for IC transplant patients ≥age 65 compared to SEER myeloma patients ≥age 65 if offered HDT-ASCT. Selection-bias prevails in the groups showing improved overall survival. Hence, a careful selection process considering physiologic age as a determinant for transplant eligibility would result in better outcomes, and not preclude the elderly from the survival benefits of HDT-ASCT.

Table 1.

Median OS in myeloma patients ≥65 years; across subsets

Median OS (95% CI)SEER patients (95% CI) (N)Emory transplant patients (95% CI) (N)
Patients ≥65 years 20 months (19.624–20.376) (48988) 62 months (55.732–68.268) (167) 
Year of diagnosis   
1993-2002 19 months (18.382–19.618) (16596) 57 months (27.523–86.477) (16) 
2003+ 22 months (21.279–22.721) (19487) 62 months (57.478–66.522) (151) 
Sex   
Male 19 months (18.481–19.519) (25185) 63 months (57.330–68.670) (103) 
Female 20 months (19.453–20.547) (23803) 53 months (40.370–65.630) (64) 
Race   
White 19 months (18.580–19.420) (39047) 59 months (47.579–70.421) (119) 
Black 21 months (20.079–21.921) (7254) 62 months (54.637–69.363) (40) 
Age stratification   
65-69 32 months (30.965–33.035) (10480) 62 months (40.737–83.263) (114) 
70-74 26 months (25.122–26.878) (11448) 56 months (44.307–67.693) (45) 
75+ 14 months (13.601–14.399) (27060) 42 months* (8) 
Median OS (95% CI)SEER patients (95% CI) (N)Emory transplant patients (95% CI) (N)
Patients ≥65 years 20 months (19.624–20.376) (48988) 62 months (55.732–68.268) (167) 
Year of diagnosis   
1993-2002 19 months (18.382–19.618) (16596) 57 months (27.523–86.477) (16) 
2003+ 22 months (21.279–22.721) (19487) 62 months (57.478–66.522) (151) 
Sex   
Male 19 months (18.481–19.519) (25185) 63 months (57.330–68.670) (103) 
Female 20 months (19.453–20.547) (23803) 53 months (40.370–65.630) (64) 
Race   
White 19 months (18.580–19.420) (39047) 59 months (47.579–70.421) (119) 
Black 21 months (20.079–21.921) (7254) 62 months (54.637–69.363) (40) 
Age stratification   
65-69 32 months (30.965–33.035) (10480) 62 months (40.737–83.263) (114) 
70-74 26 months (25.122–26.878) (11448) 56 months (44.307–67.693) (45) 
75+ 14 months (13.601–14.399) (27060) 42 months* (8) 

Comparison for all subsets p-value=0.000; * p-value 0.021.

Disclosures:

Kaufman:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Flowers:Celgene: Consultancy; Prescription Solutions: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Unpaid consultancy, Unpaid consultancy Other; Genentech: Unpaid consultancy, Unpaid consultancy Other; Gilead: Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding; Janssen lymphoma research foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Waller:Outsuka: Research Funding.

Author notes

*

Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.

Sign in via your Institution