Abstract
Abstract 355
Approximately one-third of patients considered for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched related donors (MRD). HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT is an alternative approach for the others. A prior CIBMTR analysis showed that transplantation from MUD and MRD donors produces similar survival for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) (Blood 2012; 119(17):3908–16). Patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) often are older and have more compromised performance status than patients with AML. There are also differences in disease biology and pre-transplant therapies between the disorders that could lead to different outcomes. Therefore, a disease-specific analysis of post-HCT outcomes after MUD vs. MRD was performed. Outcomes of 701 adult MDS patients who underwent allogeneic HCT between 2002 and 2006 were analyzed (MRD, n=176; 8/8 HLA-A, B, C, DRB1 allele matched MUD, n=413; 7/8 MUD, n=112). Median age was 53 years (range, 22–78). Thirty-one percent had Karnofsky performance scores (KPS) <90% at HCT. Sixty-five percent had advanced disease and 19% had therapy-related MDS. Seventy-seven percent received peripheral blood stem cells; 40% received reduced intensity conditioning regimens. The 100-day cumulative incidence of grades B-D (IBMTR Index) acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was significantly lower in MRD HCT recipients than in 8/8 MUD and 7/8 MUD HCT recipients (42%, 54%, and 57%, respectively; p=0.009). The corresponding 3-year cumulative incidences of chronic GVHD were similar among the three groups (51%, 49%, and 41%; p=0.25). In multivariate analyses, 8/8 MUD HCT recipients had similar DFS and survival rates compared to MRD HCT recipients (relative risk [RR] 1.11 (95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.89–1.39) and 1.24 (95% CI 0.98–1.56), respectively); 7/8 MUD HCT recipients had inferior DFS (RR 1.43, 95% CI 1.08–1.91) and survival (1.62, 95% CI 1.21–2.17) when compared to MRD HCT recipients and when compared to 8/8 MUD HCT recipients (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00–1.65 for DFS and 1.30, 95% CI 1.01–1.68 for survival) (Tables 1, 2 and Figure). Differences in outcome were largely related to excess TRM; relapse was not significantly different among the three groups (overall p value=0.33) (Tables 1 and 2). In patients with MDS, transplantation from 8/8 MUD and MRD donors produces similar survival, however, 7/8 MUD HCT is associated with inferior outcomes.
. | MRD Probability (95% CI) . | 8/8 MUD Probability (95% CI) . | 7/8 MUD Probability (95% CI) . | 8/8 MUD vs. MRD P value‡ . | 7/8 MUD vs. MRD P value‡ . | 7/8 MUD vs. 8/8 MUD P value‡ . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRM | 30 (24-37) | 41 (36-46) | 42 (33-51) | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.77 |
Relapse | 32 (25-39) | 24 (20-28) | 27 (19-35) | 0.058 | 0.30 | 0.59 |
DFS | 40 (33-47) | 35 (30-40) | 29 (21-37) | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.19 |
Survival | 47 (40-55) | 38 (34-43) | 31 (22-39) | 0.04 | 0.003 | 0.11 |
. | MRD Probability (95% CI) . | 8/8 MUD Probability (95% CI) . | 7/8 MUD Probability (95% CI) . | 8/8 MUD vs. MRD P value‡ . | 7/8 MUD vs. MRD P value‡ . | 7/8 MUD vs. 8/8 MUD P value‡ . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRM | 30 (24-37) | 41 (36-46) | 42 (33-51) | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.77 |
Relapse | 32 (25-39) | 24 (20-28) | 27 (19-35) | 0.058 | 0.30 | 0.59 |
DFS | 40 (33-47) | 35 (30-40) | 29 (21-37) | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.19 |
Survival | 47 (40-55) | 38 (34-43) | 31 (22-39) | 0.04 | 0.003 | 0.11 |
Adjusting for patient-related (age, gender, KPS), disease-related (International Prognostic Scoring System stage at diagnosis (d-IPSS), white blood cell count at diagnosis, therapy-related MDS, and disease status at HCT), and HCT-related variables (time between diagnosis and HCT, donor-recipient CMV and gender match, graft type, conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens).
Pointwise pairwise comparison.
. | TRM# RR (95 % CI) . | P value . | Relapse± RR (95 % CI) . | P value . | Treatment Failure (Death or Relapse)‡ RR (95 % CI) . | P value . | Mortality∥ RR (95% CI) . | P value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8/8 MUD vs. MRD | 1.37 (1.01-1.85) | 0.03 | 0.78 (0.55-1.10) | 0.16 | 1.11 (0.89-1.39) | 0.33 | 1.24 (0.98-1.56) | 0.06 |
7/8 MUD vs. MRD | 1.71 (1.17-2.47) | 0.004 | 0.94 (0.60-1.47) | 0.79 | 1.43 (1.08-1.91) | 0.01 | 1.62 (1.21-2.17) | 0.001 |
7/8 MUD vs. 8/8 MUD | 1.24 (0.90-1.70) | 0.17 | 1.20 (0.80-1.79) | 0.37 | 1.29 (1.00-1.65) | 0.04 | 1.30 (1.01-1.68) | 0.03 |
. | TRM# RR (95 % CI) . | P value . | Relapse± RR (95 % CI) . | P value . | Treatment Failure (Death or Relapse)‡ RR (95 % CI) . | P value . | Mortality∥ RR (95% CI) . | P value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8/8 MUD vs. MRD | 1.37 (1.01-1.85) | 0.03 | 0.78 (0.55-1.10) | 0.16 | 1.11 (0.89-1.39) | 0.33 | 1.24 (0.98-1.56) | 0.06 |
7/8 MUD vs. MRD | 1.71 (1.17-2.47) | 0.004 | 0.94 (0.60-1.47) | 0.79 | 1.43 (1.08-1.91) | 0.01 | 1.62 (1.21-2.17) | 0.001 |
7/8 MUD vs. 8/8 MUD | 1.24 (0.90-1.70) | 0.17 | 1.20 (0.80-1.79) | 0.37 | 1.29 (1.00-1.65) | 0.04 | 1.30 (1.01-1.68) | 0.03 |
See Table 1 for variables adjusted for in the analysis.
Other Significant factors also include:
KPS and female donor into male recipient.
Disease status at HCT, d-IPSS, and conditioning regimen.
KPS and d-IPSS.
Age, KPS, and d-IPSS.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.
This icon denotes a clinically relevant abstract