Stromal cells retard the differentiation of CD34⁺CD38^low/neg human primitive progenitors exposed to cytokines independent of their mitotic history

The loss of stem cell activity that invariably occurs when primitive cells are induced to divide by cytokines compromises attempts to obtain a net increase in the number of stem cells for therapeutic purposes in transplantation or gene transfer with murine retroviral vectors. What can be demonstrated is an amplification of cells retaining similar functional properties, such as the ability to reconstitute long-term culture (LTC) in vitro1 or nonobese diabetic–severe combined immunodeficient (NOD-SCID) recipients in vivo.2,3 However, this is by no means proof of self-renewal because the molecular identities of daughter and parent cells cannot be demonstrated in the absence of known genetic mechanisms that control self-renewal versus differentiation. Thus, net increases in the number of long-term culture-initiating cell, (LTC-IC), human NOD-SCID–reconstituting cells (rc), and, more rarely, murine long-term repopulating cells4 have been described after a short-term exposure to cytokines, but usually the expansion does not exceed a factor of 10, and the low frequency of proliferating cells participating in the expansion of the stem cell compartment also complicates evaluation of quantitative analyses of these responses.

Although stromal cells have been assigned contradictory functions, they have often been viewed as important for the maintenance of primitive progenitor activity,5 particularly in the lymphoid lineages.6 Coculture with stromal cells is the basis of the LTC system. However, now that many purified cytokines are available, several groups have demonstrated an additional ability of stromal feeders to maintain primitive hematopoietic cell function in cultures used for expansion7-9 or gene transfer protocols.10 The contribution of cytokines, adhesion molecules,11 and other stroma-derived regulators, such as Notch ligands,12 in these effects has been reported, though it is unclear whether stromal cells act by affecting cell survival13 or by promoting or delaying cell-cycle entry.14 One helpful strategy to monitor variations in cell proliferation in these conditions has been to label the cells with fluorescent dyes such as PKH-2, PKH-26,15 or more recently carboxy fluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE).16-19 Because these dyes are diluted by cell division, they can be used to track the proliferative behavior of cells in vitro and are thus useful to correlate changes in cell function with successive cell divisions. This approach has been used recently to identify cells that remain quiescent for long periods in vitro, even when they are exposed to suboptimal concentrations of cytokines and stromal feeders.20,21 It has also allowed cell proliferation to be correlated with retention of primitive phenotypes and functions (cobblestone area-forming cells and NOD-SCID repopulation) by primitive progenitors exposed to cytokines for a short period.18 19 These data have confirmed that actively proliferating cells can retain LTC-IC or NOD-SCID-rc functions, but only transiently.

Others and we22-25 have reported that murine stromal cells can counteract the loss of stem cell activity of human bone marrow CD34⁺CD38^low/neg samples exposed to high concentrations of cytokines. However, it remains unresolved whether this effect of stromal cells resulted from the rate of proliferation of an unidentified subpopulation of primitive cells. To address this question, we labeled adult bone marrow-derived CD34⁺CD38^low/neg with CFSE to monitor simultaneously cell divisions and concomitant changes in the LTC-IC activity of cells exposed to high concentrations of cytokines in the presence of murine MS5 stromal cells. The presence of MS5 cells caused marked retention of a high LTC-IC potential by cells that completed 3 or 4 divisions in 4 days in comparison to cells cultured with cytokines alone, without feeders, that showed a rapid loss of LTC-IC function. These data demonstrate that the proliferation and differentiation of primitive human hematopoietic cells can be independently regulated by stroma-derived molecules.

Samples of bone marrow were obtained with informed consent from patients undergoing hip surgery and were subjected to a standard CD34 immunomagnetic bead separation (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) exactly as previously described.25 For CFSE labeling, cells were resuspended at 1 × 10⁶ cells/mL in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and CFSE (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was added at 1 μmol/L. After 10 minutes at 37°C, further uptake of the dye was stopped by the addition of ice-cold PBS supplemented with 30% fetal calf serum (FCS; Stem Cell Technology, Vancouver, Canada). The cells were washed 3 times, the last wash in PBS without FCS, and then resuspended at a concentration of 5 to 10 × 10⁵ cells/mL in αMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 10 ng/mL PEG-recombinant human (rhu)-megakaryocyte growth and development factor (MGDF) (a kind gift from Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, and Kirin, Tokyo, Japan), 10 ng/mL rhu-Flt-3 ligand (kindly given by Immunex, Seattle, WA), and 20 ng/mL rhu-SCF (stem cell factor) (a gift from Amgen). Cells were cultured overnight at 37°C in 24-well plates to allow the efflux of all CFSE not stably bound to intracellular proteins.16 After they were washed in αMEM with 10% FCS, CFSE-labeled CD34⁺CD38^low/neg (10% to 20% total CD34⁺ cells) or CD34⁺CD38^neg (1% to 2% CD34⁺cells) fractions were sorted using a FACSVantage (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont de Claix, France) in a narrow gate (25 to 40 channels wide using a 1024-channel log amplifier). This narrow gate was required to increase the resolving power of subsequent analysis of CFSE-labeled cells. CFSE of itself did not compromise the expression of LTC-IC or the clonogenic potential of cultured CD34⁺ bone marrow-derived progenitor cells (data not shown).

In most experiments, 1 to 5 × 10⁴CFSE⁺CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells were cultured during 4 days in 24-well plates precoated or not with murine MS5 stromal cells in 1 mL αMEM containing 10% FCS. In some experiments, serum-free Iscove minimum essential medium was used.26 The following cytokines were added: rhu-MGDF (10 ng/mL), rhu-IL-6 (100 IU/mL), rhu-granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (10 ng/mL), rhu-Flt-3 ligand (10 ng/mL), rhu-SCF (20 ng/mL), and rhu-IL-3 (2 ng/mL; a kind gift from Novartis, Basel, Switzerland). An aliquot of cells was cultured during 48 hours without MS5 cells in the presence of 0.1 μg/mL Colcemid (Sigma, St Quentin Fallavier, France) as a control for undivided cells. On day 4, cells corresponding to the second, third, and fourth generations were resorted (see “Results”). The LTC-IC activity of cells from each generation was assessed in standard assays. The 5-week LTC-IC assay using MS5 cells as feeders was performed exactly as previously described in detail25 27 in bulk conditions or in limiting dilution (10 to 200 cells/well).

In 2 experiments, to increase the homogeneity of the input cells, we performed double sorting, as illustrated in Figure1. On day 4, we first selected cells that had divided twice (slow-dividing cells), an aliquot of which was kept to assay LTC-IC activity, with the remaining cells cultured 2 days later with or without MS5 cells. At the end of the second culture period, cells that had performed 2 more divisions (a total of 4 from day 0) were again sorted, and their LTC-IC potentials were analyzed.

In one experiment, we sorted cells that had completed 4 divisions (4-division cells) and those that had completed fewer than 4 divisions (0- to 3-division cells) after 4 days in culture. Four-division cells were assayed in LTC, whereas 0- to 3-division cells were cultured for another 24 hours with and without MS5 cells. The next day (day 5), we again sorted separately 4-division cells and 0- to 3-division cells, and both fractions were handled as described previously. This step was repeated again after 6 and 7 days in culture.

Statistical significance was determined by Studentt-test (paired data analysis).

To investigate whether MS5 cells altered the function of CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells exposed to cytokines through a change in their proliferation rate, we labeled cells with CFSE16 and measured the LTC-IC activity of cells that underwent the same number of divisions in 4-day cytokine-supplemented cultures with or without MS5 cells. At the end of the 4 days, the nucleated cells were distributed in different peaks of fluorescence, each corresponding to one cell generation, as shown by FACS analysis (Figure 1, step 1). As would be expected from an equal partitioning of the dye between daughter cells at each division,28 there was a linear decrease in fluorescence from one peak to the next (not shown). The 0-division point was defined from the amount of fluorescence measured in input cells cultured with Colcemid.

Our first observation was the heterogeneous rate of proliferation of individual CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells; 6 or 7 generations of daughter cells could be identified independent of the presence of MS5 cells (Figure 2). During the first 4 days, more than 98% of CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells exposed to the 6 cytokines had divided at least once and 60% at least 3 times, which fits with the 5- to 10-fold overall increase observed in the total number of nucleated cells. As shown in Figure 2, in the absence of MS5 cells, 81% ± 2% of the cells underwent 3 divisions or more, and 88% ± 3% underwent them in the presence of MS5 (mean ± SEM of 5 experiments). There was also no significant difference in the proportions of cells in the different CFSE peaks in MS5 cell-containing or MS5-free cultures, which further shows that the MS5 feeders had no effect on cell proliferation rate. A small population remained quiescent or divided only once, and, interestingly, this fraction was reproducibly lower in the presence of MS5 cells (0.5%) than in their absence (3.3%). Consequently, the proportion of cells that had accomplished more than 3 divisions appeared slightly higher on stromal cells (63% versus 50% without MS5 cells), though these latter differences did not reach significance.

Thus, the induction of cell division in CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells was primarily controlled by cytokines. This agrees with our previous results showing that few CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells with LTC-IC function, cultured as described above, survived a short exposure to 5-fluorouracil or a 16-hour exposure to high-specific activity H³-TdR (data not shown), an observation also reported by others.29 

Thus, these results confirmed previous observations from this (data not shown) and other laboratories29 showing that most CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells proliferate rapidly, but asynchronously, in response to a combination of cytokines.1 The presence of MS5 cells did not change this pattern, though it might have accelerated entry into the cycles of a few cells.

A recurrent finding in these experiments was the retention by cells cultured in the presence of MS5 feeders of high levels of expression of the CD34 antigen: thus, on day 7, the proportion of CD34⁺ cells was 72% ± 16%, and on day 10 it was 54% ± 4% (n = 16), whereas without MS5 cells these proportions fell to 48% ± 17% on day 7 and 20% ± 2% on day 10 (P < .01). Moreover, 20% ± 2% (n = 15) of the CD34⁺ cells derived from cocultures on MS5 cells were still CD38^low/neg (Figure3A), whereas none of those without MS5 cells had a CD34⁺CD38^low/neg phenotype (Figure3B). Analysis of cultured CFSE-labeled cells on day 4 confirmed that persistence of the CD34 antigen was independent of cell division. In the absence of MS5 cells more than 50% of cells in each generation peak were CD34⁻, but in the presence of MS5 cells more than 70% of cells were CD34⁺ (Figure 3B).

In the next series of experiments, we analyzed whether cells cultured for 4 days with MS5 cells and cytokines would have a different LTC-IC activity than those cultured without MS5 cells. To this end, we sorted cells that had undergone 4 or fewer divisions after 4 days in the presence or in the absence of MS5 cells, and then we cultured the sorted populations in standard LTC assays (without added cytokines)30 either in bulk cultures (2000 cells/well) or at limiting dilution (10, 50, and 200 cells/well). At least 5 independent experiments were performed for each cell generation studied.

As shown in Figure 4, which summarizes the data obtained from the bulk cultures, the number of CFCs produced at week 5 was highly dependent on 2 parameters: the number of cell divisions completed during the 4 days of cultures with cytokines and the presence of MS5 cells. Independent of the culture conditions, the number of LTC-IC–derived CFCs was the highest for cells that had divided only twice. Thus, without MS5 cells, the geometric mean of week 5 CFCs per 1000 cells that had divided twice (2-division cells) on day 4 was 1606 (n = 5), and it decreased in cells that underwent more divisions (to 311 for 3-division cells [n = 5] and 64 for 4-division cells [n = 9]). Corresponding numbers for MS5 cell-containing cultures were 1993, 1223, and 355, respectively. In both conditions, with and without MS5 cells, the decrease in the number of LTC-IC–derived CFCs between 2- division and 4-division cells was highly significant (P < .001). Interestingly, in one experiment, cells that had divided either not at all or only once produced only 350 CFCs at week 5. Similar differences were observed in experiments seeded with 50 cells/well (data not shown).

A striking effect of the MS5 cells was to cause a high LTC-IC activity to be retained by cells that completed 3 and 4 divisions in the first 4 days. Thus, 1223 and 355 week 5 CFCs were produced by 3-division cells with and without MS5 cells, respectively, and 311 and 64 for 4-division cells. These differences were statistically significant for both 3-division and 4-division cells (P < .01). The retention of LTC-IC activity mediated by MS5 cells was seen in each experiment, and the insert in Figure 4 shows that the mean of the increments accounted for by the presence of MS5 cells increased almost linearly with the number of cell divisions. The higher frequency of LTC-IC in 4-division cells grown on MS5 cells (1 per 50, n = 4) compared to that of cells grown without MS5 cells (1 per 300, n = 4) confirmed the above data.

When CD34⁺CD38^neg cells were used instead of CD38^low cells, the numbers of week 5 CFCs were higher. This result was not surprising because the most immature progenitors lacked the CD38 antigen (Table 1). Nevertheless, in this population, the effect of MS5 cells was still clear.

A second striking observation in these experiments was the lack of a difference in the LTC-IC activity of 2-division cells cultured with or without MS5 cells (Figure 4). Thus 1000 cells grown without feeders generated 1606 CFCs; with feeders they generated 1993 CFCs. One possibility is that in these slow-dividing cells, which generated a high number of CFC at week 5, the decline in potential induced by cytokines was not sufficient to be translated into a decrease in the CFC output at week 5. Consequently, an effect of MS5 cells would not be revealed. A similar reasoning applies to cells with fewer than 2 divisions. Indeed, it has been reported that all the LTC-IC activity in such cultures is associated with mitotically active cells.17 If this were true, one might assume that extending the LTC period to week 12 might unmask an effect of MS5 cells on a more slowly recruited population. However, as shown in Table2, this was not the case, and the CFC output at week 12 was identical in LTC seeded with 2-division cells initially maintained with or without MS5 cells. This result could mean that MS5 cells have no effects on very primitive cells or that the LTC-IC assay was not sufficiently discriminating to discern the effects on them.

Results described above indicate that MS5 cells counteract the decline in LTC-IC activity in proliferating cells that have divided 3 to 4 times in 4 days. In contrast, no effect of MS5 cells was seen in 4 days on slow-dividing cells. Additional support for this was obtained from the following experiment. Day 4 cells that had completed 2 divisions, either with or without MS5 cells, were isolated by FACS and transferred to LTC-IC assays, and the remaining cells were cultured for another 2 days with cytokines, with or without MS5 cells, as shown in Figure 1. On day 6, cells that had divided 2 more times (a total of 4 divisions from day 0) were sorted and assayed for their LTC-IC activity. Table 2 and Figure 5 summarize the results, which were reproducible in both experiments. As in previous experiments, cells that had completed 2 divisions by day 4 had similar LTC-IC activity regardless of whether MS5 cells were present (Figures 4, 5, Table 2). However, 2 days later, an effect of MS5 was clearly seen (Figure 5, Table 2). The presence of stromal cells from days 4 to 6 increased significantly the number of LTC-IC–derived CFCs compared to wells cultured without MS5 from days 4 to 6 (compare closed and open symbols in Figure 5, panels B1 and B2). Fifty percent of the wells seeded with cells cultured with MS5 from day 4 to day 6 yielded more than 100 CFCs, whereas none of those cultured without MS5 had any LTC-IC activity. Moreover, whether MS5 cells were present during the first 4 days did not affect the results on day 6 (compare Figure 5, panels B1 and B2).

Finally, in a last series of experiments, we investigated whether it was the number of cell divisions completed or the time in culture that was the most important parameter causing a decline in LTC-IC activity. CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells were, therefore, cultured for 4 days with or without MS5 cells, and day 4 4-division cells and 0- to 3-division cells were then isolated. Four-division cells were then transferred to standard LTC (Figure6, left panel), and 0- to 3-division cells were kept in the cytokine-containing medium (±MS5 cells) for another 2 days, after which 4-division and 0- to 3-division cells were again sorted and separately assayed for LTC-IC activity. The procedure was repeated up to day 7. In this experiment, the geometric mean of the number of week 5 CFCs was 24, 31, 40, and 10 without MS5 cells, and 44, 66, 60, and 40 with MS5 for days 4, 5, 6, and 7, respectively (Figure6). Differences in the LTC-IC activity of cells cultured with or without MS5 cells were significant at each time point, but there was no difference in the LTC-IC activity of cells cultured for 4 to 6 days under the same conditions (ie, with or without MS5 cells). Such stability in the LTC-IC activity potential of cells that had accomplished 4 divisions either in the presence or absence of MS5 cells between day 4 and day 6 in the primary cultures indicates that, at least initially, the decline in LTC-IC activity was a function of the number of divisions completed rather that their time in culture. The decrease observed on day 7 may be partly explained by deleterious effects of repeated cell sorting and in vitro manipulation.

The alteration of stem cell fate by external signals is well established in some cellular systems,31,32 but it is still a controversial issue in the hematopoietic system,5 though recent observations strongly suggest that environmental cues might induce tissue-specific differentiation programs in stem cells.33-35 However, whether it is possible, by manipulating the environment, to change, within a given tissue, the balance between self-renewal and differentiation is less clear. Our previous studies had shown that CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells cultured for 10 days on murine MS5 stromal cells retained a high LTC-IC activity.25 It was unclear whether MS5 stromal cells acted by directly changing the LTC-IC activity of cells, or by altering the rate of cell division of a rare subset of cells. In this study we used fluorescent dye labeling to correlate the variation in the LTC-IC activity of CFSE-labeled CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells with cell division and to investigate whether stromal (MS5) cells would alter this coupling.16,18,28 36 

A striking and frequent observation was the dramatic effect of MS5 cells on the LTC-IC potential of CD34⁺CD38^low/neg marrow cells that were exposed to cytokines and that achieved 3 or 4 divisions during the 4 days of the incubation period (Figures 4, 5, Table 2). Interestingly, MS5 cells had no detectable effect on the LTC-IC activity of cells that completed only 2 divisions. Of note, the presence of MS5 at the initiation of the culture had a dramatic effect on the size of the colonies generated at week 5 by LTC-IC–derived CFCs, which were much larger, and on their ability to generate BFU-E. All these findings support the conclusion that MS5 cells counteracted the differentiation of proliferating LTC-IC. This is in agreement with our previous observation that the main effect of MS5 cells in such cultures is to increase the absolute number of LTC-IC. This may be regarded as a functional measure of their self-renewal because the LTC-IC displayed CFC outputs similar to those of the parent LTC-IC.25 

These differential effects of MS5 cells on CD34⁺CD38^low/neg cells according to their mitotic rate deserve 2 comments. First, there was a decrease in the number of week 5 CFCs with each cell generation independent of the presence of stromal cells. Thus 2-division cells on day 4 generated more than 500 and up to 2500 CFCs 5 weeks later, whereas on average 10- to 100-fold lower numbers of CFCs were produced by other cells in the same primary cultures that had divided 4 times. This loss of LTC-IC activity by cells that divide rapidly, that is more than 3 to 4 times in 4 days, was expected because cells with the highest potential are quiescent or cycle slowly.13,15 Interestingly, in one experiment, cells that did not divide at all or that divided only once within 4 days showed little LTC-IC activity (Figure 4). This suggests that LTC-IC activity may be expressed transiently by primitive cells during their differentiation and is then lost after a critical number of cell divisions.17 Accordingly, events that dictate the retention by cells of an ability to form colonies 5 weeks later may be tightly controlled, perhaps by a molecular clock, as has been described for neuronal cells37 or for hematopoietic cells in which telomere shortening has been suggested as a mechanism that determines stem cell life span.38 39 As a consequence, there may be only a narrow window in the differentiation of primitive hematopoietic cells to assess changes in LTC-IC activity.

This is confirmed by data shown in Figures 4 and 5 in which the effect of MS5 cells was detectable only in cells that had gone through 3 to 4 divisions and not in more slowly dividing cells (0- to 2-division cells). Because the LTC-IC activity was very high in these 2-division cells, a subtle change induced by stromal cells may not have been translated into a change in the number of output CFCs 5 weeks later. Furthermore, in one experiment in which the culture was prolonged up to 12 weeks,40 the number of CFCs produced by cells grown with or without MS5 cells did not differ, indicating that the sensitivity of the assay was not the only parameter involved. Interestingly, the sizes and types of colonies seen in assays of LTC-IC from 2-division cells were identical, independent of the presence of MS5 cells in the primary cultures. This argues against a major functional difference in these slowly dividing LTC-ICs. Alternatively, because these cells divided only twice in 4 days, 2 mitoses might not have allowed sufficient time for MS5 cells to alter their fate. Nevertheless, it is remarkable that the increased CFC output obtained when MS5 cells were present was strongly correlated with the number of divisions completed (see Figure 4, insert). This suggests that MS5 cells act by changing the probability of a cell to retain or lose LTC-IC activity at each division.

To further exclude the contribution of a rare subset of input cells induced to proliferate by MS5 cells in the observed effect, we performed a 2-step experiment. Slowly dividing (2-division) cells were sorted on day 4, and these were then incubated for 2 more days either with or without MS5 cells before assessing the LTC-IC present. The results of these experiments clearly identified a striking effect of the MS5 cells in preventing a decrease in the LTC-IC activity seen in 4-division cells exposed to cytokines alone from day 4 to day 6 (P < .01; Figure 6). Thus, it appears that any strategy to influence the LTC-IC outcome will be best identified in cells that have gone through at least 3 divisions.

In summary, this study clearly shows that stromal cells can perturb the fate of primitive hematopoietic cells that actively proliferate when exposed to cytokines and that they allow some to retain primitive functions, such as those identified by the LTC-IC assay. The lack of differentiation could not be explained by a negative action of the feeder on cell proliferation.20,41 This raises the important question of the molecular mechanisms by which MS5 cells can affect the decisions of a primitive cell to lose (differentiate) or to retain (self-renew) its LTC-IC function. Increased self-renewal has been associated with increased Bcl-2 activity,42overexpression of HoxB4,43,44 inhibition of GATA-2,45 and increased telomerase activity.46 Activation of the Notch pathway should also be considered because the Jagged–Notch interaction promotes a 2- to 3-fold expansion of normal hematopoietic progenitors by preventing the differentiation of dividing cells.12 47-49 Because MS5 cells transcribe these DSL ligands (Jagged1-2 and Delta1) (data not shown), such a mechanism is a possibility. It will also now be of interest to determine whether MS5 cells can cause the retention of properties characteristic of primitive hematopoietic cells, such as their ability to engraft NOD-SCID mice or to generate lymphoid progeny.

We thank Brigitte Izac for her expert help with the LTC-IC assays and all the surgeons and nurses who helped provide bone marrow samples. We thank the staff at Amgen-France (rhu-SCF) and Amgen-Thousands Oaks (MGDF), Immunex (Flt3-l), Novartis (IL-3), and Cilag (Epo) for their generosity in providing cytokines. We also thank Yves Levy for reading the manuscript and Pierre Walrafen for help in statistical analysis.