In 93 allograft recipients, the numbers of marrow B-cell precursors on days 80 and 365 correlated with the counts of circulating B cells, suggesting that the posttransplantation B-cell deficiency is at least in part due to insufficient B lymphopoiesis. Factors that could affect B lymphopoiesis were evaluated. The number of marrow B-cell precursors on days 30 and 80 was at least 4-fold lower in patients with grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) compared with patients with grade 0 to 1 acute GVHD. The number of B-cell precursors on day 365 was 18-fold lower in patients with extensive chronic GVHD compared with patients with no or limited chronic GVHD. The number of B-cell precursors was not related to CD34 cell dose, type of transplant (marrow versus blood stem cells), donor age, or patient age. It was concluded that posttransplantation B-cell deficiency results in part from inhibition of B lymphopoiesis by GVHD and/or its treatment.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are immunocompromised for more than 1 year after grafting.1,2 Quantitative B-cell deficiency plays a role in the susceptibility of transplant recipients to infections.3 The quantitative B-cell deficiency may be due in part to low B-cell production (B lymphopoiesis) in the marrow of HCT recipients. Quantitative deficiency of B-cell precursors is observed in virtually all patients in the first month and in some patients for more than 1 year after grafting.4-6 We set out to determine which factors might influence B-cell–precursor quantity (index of B lymphopoiesis) in the marrow of HCT recipients. We hypothesized that the following factors might play a role: (1) CD34 cell dose; (2) graft type (marrow versus blood stem cells), as blood stem cell recipients receive 3 times more CD34 cells and 18 times fewer B-cell precursors compared with marrow recipients7; (3) patient or donor age, as young, normal individuals have more B-cell precursors than older individuals8-10; and (4) acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or its treatment, as chronic GVHD and/or its treatment were associated with low marrow content of B-cell precursors in a small clinical study6 and B-lymphopoiesis was inhibited by glucocorticoids in a murine study.11 12 

Since one of the goals of the study was to determine how B lymphopoiesis was influenced by the graft type, we studied patients randomized to receive either marrow or filgrastim-mobilized blood stem cells.13 Of 135 patients treated randomly with either transplant type at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 123 patients agreed to institutional review board–approved studies of immune reconstitution. Twelve patients died by day 30. One patient received marrow instead of blood stem cells and was excluded from analysis. For 17 patients, no marrow samples were submitted for the quantitation of B-cell precursors. Thus, 93 patients were evaluable for the quantitation of B-cell precursors between 1 and 12 months after transplantation. Their characteristics, including data on CD34 cell dose, graft type, age, and acute and chronic GVHD, are displayed in Table 1.

Marrow was aspirated on approximately days 30, 80, and 365 after transplantation. Cells were stained with CD19 antibody conjugated to phycoerythrin; CD45 antibody conjugated to peridinin-chlorophyll; and CD2, CD3, CD5, and CD33 antibodies conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA). Erythrocytes were lysed by NH4Cl (0.83%, buffered with KHCO3, pH 7.2). Flow cytometry data acquisition was performed on CytoronAbsolute (Ortho, Raritan, NJ) or FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson) instruments. Data analysis was performed by means of Winlist software (Verity House, Topsham, ME). Cellular debris and nonviable cells were first eliminated by forward- versus side-scatter gating. Then, the percentage of B-cell precursors (CD19+CD45lowCD2/CD3/CD5/CD33) of total CD45+ cells was determined.9,14 15 We used the percentage of B-cell precursors among marrow CD45+cells corrected for marrow cellularity (multiplied by the percentage of normal cellularity divided by 100) and for the ratio of myeloid and lymphoid cells to erythrocyte precursors (M:E ratio) since erythrocyte precursors do not express CD45 (multiplied by M:E ratio divided by [1 + M:E ratio]). For example, if 10% of marrow CD45+ cells were B-cell precursors, the hematopoietic cell–to–fat ratio was 25:75 (50% normal), and the M:E ratio was 4:1, then the corrected percentage of B-cell precursors was 10 × 0.5 × 0.8 = 4. Marrow cellularity and M:E ratio were estimated from standard decalcified biopsy sections or aspirated particle sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Marrow specimens from patients whose hematologic malignancy relapsed were not evaluated unless relapse was determined only by a polymerase chain reaction.

Patients who developed grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD by day 30 had a lower percentage of B-cell precursors on day 30 compared with patients who developed grade 0 to 1 acute GVHD by day 30 (median, 0.1 versus 0.4; P = .03, Mann-Whitney rank-sum test). Patients who developed grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD by day 90 had a lower percentage of B-cell precursors on day 80 compared with patients who developed grade 0 to 1 acute GVHD by day 90 (median, 0 versus 0.9;P < .001). Patients who developed clinical extensive, chronic GVHD in the first posttransplantation year had a lower percentage of B-cell precursors on day 365 compared with patients who developed no or limited chronic GVHD in the first year (median, 0.1 versus 1.8; P < .001) (Figure1, upper panels). We could not separate the effect of acute or chronic GVHD from the effect of glucocorticoids as there were few patients on glucocorticoids without GVHD and few patients off glucocorticoids with GVHD. The GVHD and/or its treatment depressed both early (CD19low) and late (CD19high) B-cell precursors; however, the early precursors appeared depressed to a greater degree (Figure 1, middle and lower panels).

Fig. 1.

Percentage of B-cell precursors among CD45+marrow cells (corrected for marrow cellularity and for M:E ratio).

Total, CD19low (early), and CD19high (late) B-cell precursors were quantitated (upper, middle, and lower panels, respectively). The corrected percentage of total B-cell precursors on day 30 was lower in patients who developed grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD by day 30 (n = 19) than in patients who did not do so (n = 52). The corrected percentage of total B-cell precursors on day 80 was lower in patients who developed grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD by day 90 (n = 54) than in patients who did not do so (n = 20). The corrected percentage of total B-cell precursors on day 365 was lower in patients who developed clinical extensive, chronic GVHD (n = 28) than in patients who developed no or limited chronic GVHD (n = 23) in the first posttransplantation year. The corrected percentages of the early precursors appear to be influenced by the GVHD and/or its treatment to a greater extent than the late precursors. The squares denote medians and the vertical bars denote 25th to 75th percentiles. In all 9 graphs, the difference between the 2 groups is significant (P < .05 for day 30; P < .01 for day 80;P < .001 for day 365).

Fig. 1.

Percentage of B-cell precursors among CD45+marrow cells (corrected for marrow cellularity and for M:E ratio).

Total, CD19low (early), and CD19high (late) B-cell precursors were quantitated (upper, middle, and lower panels, respectively). The corrected percentage of total B-cell precursors on day 30 was lower in patients who developed grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD by day 30 (n = 19) than in patients who did not do so (n = 52). The corrected percentage of total B-cell precursors on day 80 was lower in patients who developed grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD by day 90 (n = 54) than in patients who did not do so (n = 20). The corrected percentage of total B-cell precursors on day 365 was lower in patients who developed clinical extensive, chronic GVHD (n = 28) than in patients who developed no or limited chronic GVHD (n = 23) in the first posttransplantation year. The corrected percentages of the early precursors appear to be influenced by the GVHD and/or its treatment to a greater extent than the late precursors. The squares denote medians and the vertical bars denote 25th to 75th percentiles. In all 9 graphs, the difference between the 2 groups is significant (P < .05 for day 30; P < .01 for day 80;P < .001 for day 365).

Close modal

Peripheral blood stem cell recipients and marrow recipients did not significantly differ in the percentage of total B-cell precursors on day 30, 80, or 365. Also, there was no significant correlation between CD34 cell dose, patient age, or donor age and the percentage of B-cell precursors on either day 30 or day 80 (Spearman rank correlation test). Similarly, there was no significant correlation between CD34 cell dose or patient age and the percentage of B-cell precursors on day 365. However, there was an inverse correlation between the percentage of B-cell precursors on day 365 and donor age (r = −0.32; P = .02). In multivariate analysis, the percentage of B-cell precursors on day 365 was significantly associated with clinical extensive chronic GVHD (P < .001) and not with donor age (linear regression analysis of log-transformed percentages).

We also evaluated whether a low percentage of B-cell precursors was associated with low circulating B-cell counts (determined as described [mononuclear cells expressing CD19 or CD20 and not brightly expressing CD3, CD13, CD14, CD16, CD56, CD10, or CD34]7 on days 30, 80, 180, and 365 after transplantation). The following correlations were found: (1) the percentage of B-cell precursors on day 80 and B-cell counts on day 80 (Spearman correlation coefficientr = 0.25; P = .057); (2) the percentage of B-cell precursors on day 80 and B-cell counts on day 180 (r = 0.35; P = .031); and (3) the percentage of B-cell precursors on day 365 and B-cell counts on day 365 (r = 0.50; P = .002).

The results show that between days 80 and 365 after transplantation, the size of the circulating B-cell pool depends on B lymphopoiesis and that GVHD and/or its treatment is the major factor influencing B lymphopoiesis. CD34 cell dose, graft type (blood stem cells versus marrow), patient age, and donor age do not affect B lymphopoiesis significantly.

In the first 3 months after grafting, blood stem cell recipients have significantly higher counts of circulating B cells than marrow recipients.7,16 Because the percentage of B-cell precursors on days 30 and 80 was similar in blood stem cell and marrow recipients, the higher circulating B-cell count in blood stem cell recipients is most likely due to the higher content of mature B cells in blood stem cell grafts compared with marrow grafts,7,16 17 rather than to increased B lymphopoiesis.

There are several possible mechanisms by which patients with GVHD have decreased B lymphopoiesis. The first is through production of cytokines from activated cells that may inhibit B lymphopoiesis. Examples include interferon-γ produced by T cells18 or interleukin-1 produced by macrophages during the GVHD-associated “cytokine storm.”12,19,20 The second possible mechanism is the destruction of marrow stromal cells, which support B lymphopoiesis,21 by donor lymphocytes (graft-versus-stroma reaction).22,23 The third mechanism is suppression of B lymphopoiesis through treatments given for GVHD, eg, glucocorticoids.11 12 Although some of these mechanisms might be amenable to a therapeutic intervention, significant improvement of B lymphopoiesis is likely to be achieved only through effective GVHD prophylaxis.

Supported by National Institutes of Health grants CA68496, AI46108, CA18221, and CA18029.

The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. section 1734.

1
Parkman
R
Weinberg
KI
Immunological reconstitution following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.
Thomas
ED
Blume
KG
Forman
SJ
1999
704
711
Blackwell Science
Malden, MA
2
Storek
J
Witherspoon
RP
Immunologic reconstitution after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Clinical Bone Marrow and Blood Stem Cell Transplantation.
Atkinson
K
2000
111
146
Cambridge University Press
Cambridge, England
3
Storek
J
Espino
G
Dawson
MA
Storer
B
Flowers
MED
Maloney
DG
Low B cell and monocyte counts on day 80 are associated with high infection rates between day 100 and 365 after allogeneic marrow transplantation.
Blood.
96
2000
3290
3293
4
Asma
GEM
Langois
R
van den Bergh
RL
Vossen
JM
Regeneration of TdT+, pre-B and B cells in bone marrow after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation.
Transplantation.
43
1987
865
870
5
Leitenberg
D
Rappeport
JM
Smith
BR
B cell precursor bone marrow reconstitution after bone marrow transplantation.
Am J Clin Pathol.
102
1994
231
236
6
Storek
J
Witherspoon
RP
Webb
D
Storb
R
Lack of B cell precursors in marrow transplant recipients with chronic GVHD.
Am J Hematol.
52
1996
82
89
7
Storek J, Dawson MA, Storer B, et al. Immune reconstitution after allogeneic marrow versus blood stem cell transplantation. Blood. In press.
8
Ryan
D
Kossover
S
Mitchell
S
Frantz
C
Hennessy
L
Cohen
H
Subpopulations of common acute lymphoblastic leukemia antigen-positive lymphoid cells in normal bone marrow identified by hematopoietic differentiation antigens.
Blood.
68
1986
417
425
9
Caldwell
CW
Poje
E
Helikson
MA
B-cell precursors in normal pediatric bone marrow.
Am J Clin Pathol.
95
1991
816
823
10
Stephan
RP
Reilly
CR
Witte
PL
Impaired ability of bone marrow stromal cells to support B-lymphopoiesis with age.
Blood.
91
1998
75
88
11
Garvy
BA
Telford
WG
King
LE
Fraker
PJ
Glucocorticoids and irradiation-induced apoptosis in normal murine bone marrow B-lineage lymphocytes as determined by flow cytometry.
Immunology.
79
1993
270
277
12
Borghesi
LA
Smithson
G
Kincade
PW
Stromal cell modulation of negative regulatory signals that influence apoptosis and proliferation of B lineage lymphocytes.
J Immunol.
159
1997
4171
4179
13
Bensinger
WI
Martin
P
Storer
B
et al
Transplantation of bone marrow as compared with peripheral blood cells from HLA-identical relatives in patients with hematologic malignancies.
N Engl J Med.
344
2001
175
181
14
Stelzer
GT
Shults
KE
Loken
MR
CD45 gating for routine flow cytometric analysis of human bone marrow specimens.
Ann N Y Acad Sci.
677
1993
265
280
15
Loken
MR
Multidimensional data analysis in immunophenotyping.
Current Protocols in Cytometry.
Robinson
JP
1997
10.4.1
10.4.7
Wiley-Liss
New York, NY
16
Storek
J
Witherspoon
RP
Maloney
DG
Chauncey
TR
Storb
R
Improved reconstitution of CD4 T cells and B cells but worsened reconstitution of serum IgG levels after allogeneic transplantation of blood stem cells instead of marrow [letter].
Blood.
89
1997
3891
3893
17
Ottinger
HD
Beelen
DW
Scheulen
B
Schaefer
UW
Grosse-Wilde
H
Improved immune reconstitution after allotransplantation of peripheral blood stem cells instead of bone marrow.
Blood.
88
1996
2775
2779
18
Garvy
BA
Elia
JM
Hamilton
BL
Riley
RL
Suppression of B-cell development as a result of selective expansion of donor T cells during the minor H antigen graft-versus-host reaction.
Blood.
82
1993
2758
2766
19
Morrissey
P
Charrier
K
Bressler
L
Alpert
A
The influence of IL-1 treatment on the reconstitution of the hemopoietic and immune systems after sublethal radiation.
J Immunol.
140
1988
4204
4210
20
Ferrara
JLM
Deeg
HJ
Burakoff
SJ
Graft-vs.-Host Disease.
1997
Marcel Dekker
New York, NY
21
LeBien
TW
Fates of human B-cell precursors.
Blood.
96
2000
9
23
22
Okamoto
T
Kanamaru
A
Kakishita
E
Nagai
K
Stromal fibroblastic and hematopoietic progenitors in patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD).
Int J Hematol.
54
1991
299
306
23
Torok-Storb
B
Holmberg
L
Mielcarek
M
Mechanisms of poor marrow function and late graft failure.
Clinical Bone Marrow and Blood Stem Cell Transplantation.
Atkinson
K
2000
67
73
Cambridge University Press
Cambridge, England
24
Storb
R
Deeg
HJ
Whitehead
J
et al
Methotrexate and cyclosporine compared with cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of acute graft versus host disease after marrow transplantation for leukemia.
N Engl J Med.
314
1986
729
735

Author notes

Jan Storek, FHCRC, D1-100, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109-1024; e-mail: jstorek@fhcrc.org.

Sign in via your Institution