Abstract
This prospective multi-center trial (MiniMud) concerns 27 patients (13 females, 14 males - 56 years[18–65]) who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from unrelated donors. The diagnosis and disease status pre-transplant were AML (n=12; 5 CR1, 7 CR2), ALL (n=1; 1 CR2), MM (n=5; 3 PR2,1 PR3, 1 PR4), NHL (n=4; 1 CR1, 2 PR3, 1 PR4), MPS (n=3; 2 stable disease (SD), 1 Relapse), acute RAEB (n=1; 1 progressive disease (PD) and CLL (n=1; 1 PR2). In total, 14 patients were in CR, 9 in PR, 2 in SD, 2 in PD. The median interval between diagnosis and transplant was 27 months [5;171], 24 patients received PBSC and 3 received bone marrow from unrelated 10/10 antigen HLA-identical (high-resolution level). All patients received Fludarabine 30 mg/m2/dx5d, Treosulfan 12 g/m2/dx3d and ATG 2,5 mg/kg/dx3d. After transplant, we observed 2 graft failures, 7 patients developed an AGVHD ≥ grade II (30%). Only 23 patients were eligibile to be analysed after 3 months of follow-up post transplant, 7 patients developed cGVHD (30%) (5 limited and 2 extensive), 12 patients died (7 from TRM causes and 5 from relapse) and 12 patients are alive in CR with a median follow-up of 14 months. Among the global population we defined a low risk subgroup: 17 patients [12 AML (5 CR1, 7 CR2), 1 ALL (CR2), 3 MM (3 PR2) and 1 NHL (CR1)], 2 patients presented an AGVHD ≥ grade II (13%). With a median follow-up of 18 months, 2 patients had a follow-up of less than 3 months, 3 patients developed a cGVHD (20%), 6 patients died (40%) and 9 patients are alive in CR. At one year, the probability of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 50.4% [32;79], 40% [23;70] for the total population and 60% [37;96], 51.5% [29;90] for the low risk subgroup respectively. To try to demonstrate if Treosulfan allowed a better transplant outcome we performed a paired match-analysis [center and 4 out of 5 other parameters (age, gender, HSC, pre-transplant status and diagnosis] comparing our Treosulfan series and RIC transplants receiving Fludarabine, Busulfan and ATG (2.5–12.5mg/kg) from the SFGM-TC registry. This paired match-analysis found only RICT from related donors in the SFGM-TC database and showed no difference in term of OS and EFS between our unrelated donor-Treosulfan and related donor-SFGM-TC series.
In conclusion, these results demonstrate that Treosulfan appears to be a very promising drug that could be included in the conditioning regimen before HSCT from either related or unrelated donors.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal