Introduction: DDX41 (DEAD-box helicase 41) mutations (mt) represent the most prevalent germline predisposition syndrome (GPS) in adult patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This molecular subtype is typically associated with late-onset disease, runs an indolent clinical course, with a relative absence of high-risk co-mutations. While several retrospective studies have reported favorable responses to venetoclax (VEN)-based therapies, anecdotal observations suggest variable outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with DDX41-mt MDS/AML treated at the Mayo Clinic.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of pts diagnosed with DDX41-mt germline predisposition syndrome with concurrent myeloid neoplasms at our institution. Germline testing was conducted under an IRB approved protocol (Mayo Clinic IRB# 16-004173; clinical-trials gov. Identifier: NCT02958462). Of 198 pts with DDX41-mt myeloid neoplasms, 77 had high-risk disease—43 with MDS with increased blasts (MDS-IB1, n = 11; IB2, n = 32) and 34 with AML (WHO 2022). We assessed how clinical, and disease features influenced outcomes in this subgroup. Among these pts, 69 (90%) pts had likely pathogenic/pathogenic variant (DDX41path) variants and 8 (10%) pts had variant of undetermined significance (DDX41VUS) according to variant classification criteria from the American College of Medical Genetics/ the Association of Medical Genetics/ the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) guidelines.

Results: The median age was 68 years (yrs) (range [R],34-92), 70% were male and the median bone marrow blast % was 15 (R,5-60). The most common DDX41 germlinevariants (> 5% cases) included p.D140fs (26%), p.M1I (22%), and p.P258L (6.5%). 74% had DDX41 truncating variants. Thirty-one (40%) acquired a somatic DDX41-mt (R525H [81%]) and 43 (56%) had other somatic mutations. Among these, the most frequent were ASXL1 (n= 9, 21%), TP53 (n= 8, 10%), splicing factor (n= 7, 9%), and DNMT3A (n= 5, 6%). Twenty-six, (34%), 26 (34%), 15 (19%) and 9 (12%) pts were treated with hypomethylating agents (HMA), HMA+VEN, intensive chemotherapy (IC) and active surveillance/supportive care, respectively. Overall, the composite complete remission rate (cCR) in high-risk MDS and AML was 56%. The cCR rates (41%, 59% and 68.7%, p= 0.10) and median duration of response (DOR; 43.7, 44.9 and 28.9 months [mo], p= 0.46) were not significantly different with HMA, HMA+VEN, and IC induction. Thirty-one (40%) pts received allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT); 4 (36%), 15 (47%) and 12 (35%) in MDS-IB1, MDS-IB2 and AML groups, respectively (p= 0.56). With a median follow up of 34.7 mo (R, 0.7-136.7), the median overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis was 56.9 mo (95% CI, 50.7-63.0) and was not significantly (NS) different between MDS-IB1 (not reached, 70% at 3 yrs), MDS-IB2 (56.9 mo, 86% at 3 yrs) and AML (55.7 mo, 60% at 3 yrs) groups, p= 0.16). The median OS was NS different between DDX41path and DDX41VUS (58.6 vs 55.7 mo, p= 0.50), respectively. We conducted a multivariable analysis for OS using variables that showed significance or trend towards significance in univariable analysis. Concurrent splicing factor mutations (HR; 5.29, 95% CI: 1.29-21.6, p= 0.02) remained negatively prognostic, while there was a trend towards better survival outcomes with allo-HCT (HR; 0.48, 95% CI: 0.21-1.07, p= 0.07). Bone marrow blast ≥ 20% (HR; 1.87, p= 0.12) and TP53-mt (HR; 2.14, p= 0.12) did not retain significance.

Conclusion: In our cohort of patients with germline DDX41-mt high-risk MDS and AML, VEN-based regimens were not superior to HMA alone or IC, in terms of response rates and outcomes. On multivariable analysis, the presence of concurrent splicing factor mutations independently and negatively impacted survival with a trend towards better outcomes with allo-HCT. These findings highlight the heterogeneity within DDX41-mt myeloid neoplasms and underscore the need for future studies in larger cohorts to better define predictors of response and survival.

This content is only available as a PDF.
Sign in via your Institution