Erythropoietin receptor-dependent erythroid colony-forming unit development: capacities of Y343 and phosphotyrosine-null receptor forms

Red blood cell production depends on the interaction of erythropoietin (EPO) with its single transmembrane receptor. In EPO^−/− or EPO receptor^−/−mice, definitive erythropoiesis is blocked at the erythroid colony-forming unit (CFUe) stage.1 EPO is secreted from kidney and fetal liver in response to hypoxia,2 targets erythroid lineage- and stage-specific EPO receptor-positive cells primarily in marrow,3 and is clinically important in the treatment of anemia.4 As a class 1 cytokine receptor,5 the EPO receptor initiates EPO-dependent signal transduction events by activating Janus kinase (Jak) 2, which binds preformed EPO receptor dimers at a conserved Box1 motif.6,7 Activated Jak2 is then thought to phosphorylate the EPO receptor at 8 cytoplasmic tyrosine sites, and primary Src homology 2 domain-encoding proteins are recruited. Analyses using truncated and tyrosine-mutated murine EPO (mEPO) receptors have assigned several proteins to specific phosphotyrosine (PY) sites (reviewed in references 8 and 9), including signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)5a and 5b at PY³⁴³, PY⁴⁰¹, SHP1, and SHP2 tyrosine phosphatases at PY^429/431 and PY⁴⁰¹, respectively, Ship1 inositol 5-phosphatase at PY⁴⁰¹, PY⁴²⁹, PY⁴³¹,10 p85 regulatory subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI-3) kinase at PY⁴⁷⁹, APS adaptor at PY³⁴³, Grb2 adaptor at PY⁴⁶⁴, Lyn tyrosine kinase at PY⁴⁶⁴, and Cis1 and Cis3/SOCS3 suppressors of cytokine signaling at PY⁴⁰¹.11 Additional signal transduction factors that have been shown to bind activated EPO receptor complexes include the tyrosine kinases Syk and Tec, phospholipase C-γ, the adaptors Shc, Cbl, CrkL, IRS-2, and Gab1/2, and the nucleotide exchange factors mSOS, Vav, and C3G.8,9Finally, signals generated by this collection of factors also integrate with signals from several coexpressed receptors, including those for stem cell factor (SCF), interleukin-3, and insulinlike growth factor-1.8 9 

Despite the complexity of this EPO receptor signal transduction network, studies of EPO receptor PY or carboxyl terminal truncation mutants in fetal liver and transgenic mice interestingly have demonstrated that either PY⁴⁷⁹- or PY³⁴³-directed pathways alone can efficiently support CFUe development.12-14 Within the PY⁴⁷⁹ route, PI-3 kinase, Akt kinase, and FKHRL1 Forkhead transcription factor have been implicated as important downstream effectors,15 and PY³⁴³ has been shown to target STAT5 andbcl-x.16,17 Regarding PY³⁴³ and STAT5, however, their roles in EPO receptor signaling and erythropoiesis are controversial. In several cell line models, PY³⁴³ has been documented as dispensable18,19or essential for efficient EPO receptor-dependent growth, survival, andbcl-x gene transcription.17,20-22 In addition, in STAT5a^−/− and STAT5b^−/− mice, no defects in embryonic or adult erythropoiesis were revealed in one analysis,23 while a second described marked fetal anemia and reduced hematocrit levels in 50% of neonates.16,24These disparate findings might reflect cell-line–specific effects or compensatory or non–cell autonomous complications in vivo. To investigate the signaling capacities of a PY-null EPO receptor form in primary CFUe while avoiding compensatory mechanisms potentiated in knock-out and knock-in systems, a minimal receptor form retaining domains for Jak2 binding and activation but lacking all 8 cytoplasmic tyrosine sites was expressed in transgenic mice from a GATA1gene vector25,26 as a human epidermal growth factor (hEGF)–mEPO receptor chimera (EE-T-Y343F). To allow for analyses of the signaling capacities of this minimal EPO receptor form at an appropriate stage of erythropoiesis, a thiamphenicol (TAP)–based system also was used to generate developmentally synchronized erythroid progenitor cells from these mice.14,27 28 Analyses reveal that a Jak2-activating, PY-null EPO receptor form supports CFUe development in the absence of detectable STAT5 activation. However, attenuated bioactivity of this PY-null EPO receptor form (compared with either a PY³⁴³-containing form or the endogenous EPO receptor) also is described and is linked to a stage-specific defect in erythroblast maturation. Finally, in analyses of EPO receptor and c-Kit cosignaling, PY³⁴³-containing and PY-null EPO receptor forms were observed to efficiently support SCF-dependent synergy toward CFUe proliferation. Possible mechanisms underlying this apparent EPO receptor PY-independent synergy are discussed.

A cDNA encoding the minimal hEGF receptor–mEPO receptor chimera EE-T-Y343F29 was subcloned into the GATA1gene–derived vector pA2GATA.25,26 Then a KpnI to ClaI fragment (17 kb) was purified and injected into pronuclei. These preparations were implanted into pseudopregnant B6D2F₁ females, and founders were identified by Southern blot analysis using BglII and a ³²P-labeled, 770-bp BglII to XbaI mEPO receptor cDNA fragment.30 Transgenic mice expressing the chimera EE-T-Y343 (from the above pA2GATA vector) were generated as previously described.14 In assays of chimeric receptor expression, marrow cells were cultured under conditions shown by Panzenbock et al31 to promote the selective expansion of CFUe. At 72 hours of culture, cells were washed in 140 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM KH₂PO₄, 8.1 mM Na₂HPO₄, pH 7.4, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin and were incubated at 4°C stepwise with the murine immunoglobulin (Ig)G Fc fragment (5 μg/mL, 1.5 hours) and a monoclonal antibody to the hEGF receptor extracellular domain (EGFR.1; PharMingen, San Diego, CA) (3.3 μg/mL, 1.5 hours). Cells then were washed, incubated for 30 minutes on ice with a phycoerythrin-conjugated anti–murine IgG F(ab')₂ antibody (Jackson, West Grove, PA), washed again, and analyzed quantitatively by flow cytometry as described previously.14 

Erythroid progenitor cells were prepared from the spleens of mice treated with TAP.27 On day 1, TAP (15 mg per gram-weight in 0.4 mL water) was implanted subcutaneously, and mice were phlebotomized (80 μL) for 3 subsequent days. On day 6, TAP was removed; at 72 hours after TAP withdrawal, splenocytes were isolated as previously described.14 For in vitro differentiation assays, erythroid splenocytes were plated at 1 × 10⁶cells/mL in 0.1% methylcellulose (Methocult M3234; Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada), 15% fetal bovine serum, 1% delipidated bovine serum albumin, 200 μg/mL iron-saturated transferrin, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 3 μg/mL insulin, and 150 ng/mL mSCF in Iscoves modified Dulbecco medium. Either hEPO (5 U/mL; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA) or hEGF (5 ng/mL; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was then added. Ter119 antigen expression was assayed using a phycoerythrin-conjugated antibody (1.5 μg/0.15 mL assay) (PharMingen). Hemoglobinized colonies were stained with 0.1 vol freshly combined solution of 1 part 1.5% benzidine in 90% acetic acid plus 6 parts 5% hydrogen peroxide. For assays of SCF-, hEGF-, and EPO-stimulated proliferation, erythroid splenocytes (5 × 10⁶ cells/mL in 10% fetal bovine serum; OptiMEM I medium; Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) were exposed to cytokines and were cultured for 48 hours. Rates of methyl–[³H]-thymidine incorporation then were determined as described.28 

Splenocytes were isolated from TAP-treated mice at 72, 96, and 120 hours after TAP withdrawal. RNA then was isolated using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies) and was analyzed by Northern blotting32 using the following³²P-labeled cDNA probes: EPO receptor (1.5 kbXhoI fragment of pXMwtER), β^maj-globin (1.1-kb BglII to XbaI fragment of pGEM7-β^maj-globin), c-Kit (1.5-kbBamHI to NheI fragment of pREP4ΔEB-c-Kit), and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (0.8-kbKpnI to XhoI fragment of pSP-GAPDH).32 In electrophoretic mobility shift assays, splenocytes from TAP-treated mice were cultured for 5 hours in the absence of cytokines and then were exposed for 7.5 minutes to either hEGF (15 ng/mL) or EPO (10 U/mL). STAT5 DNA-binding activities in nuclear extracts then were determined as described17 using a ³²P-labeled interferon γ–activated site (5′-TGC TTC TTG GAA TT-3′) from the β-casein promoter. Unlabeled competing STAT5 or irrelevant NFκB (5′-AGC TAA GGG ACT TTC CGC TGG GGA CTT TCC AGG-3′) elements were used at a 50-fold molar excess.

Investigations first sought to compare the abilities of 2 minimal chimeric EPO receptor forms, EE-T-Y343 and EE-T-Y343F, to support CFUe development during adult erythropoiesis. In these chimeras (Figure1, upper panel), the extracellular domain of the mEPO receptor was replaced with that of the hEGF receptor to provide for direct immunoassay of expression levels, hEGF-dependent conditional activation, and direct comparisons of signaling capacities with coexpressed endogenous EPO receptors in primary cells. Within the EPO receptor cytoplasmic region, Box1 (and 2) motifs—including a domain for Jak2 association—were retained, but the carboxyl terminus was truncated to remove 7 of 8 tyrosine residues. In EE-T-Y343, a well-defined PY³⁴³ site for STAT5 binding also was retained,33-36 whereas in EE-T-Y343F this site was mutated to phenylalanine. Previously, our laboratory37 and Pacifici et al38 have shown in cell lines that high proliferative activity is retained by chimeras fused at C⁶²⁰ of the hEGF receptor to P²²⁵ of the mEPO receptor and that, for a corresponding full-length chimera, hEGF dose-response curves closely parallel those for EPO and the wild-type EPO receptor. Expression of EE-T-Y343 and -Y343F receptors in transgenic mice was accomplished using a GATA1 gene–derived vector. This vector, pA2GATA, contains enhancer, promoter, and intron elements that together restrict expression to erythroid and megakaryocytic progenitor cells.25,26 To confirm comparable levels of surface expression for each chimeric EPO receptor form in the lines of transgenic mice selected for study, erythroid progenitor cells were expanded from marrow and were analyzed by flow cytometry using an hEGF receptor antibody (Figure 1, lower panels). In each case, receptor densities were estimated to be between 2000 and 5000 receptors per cell.14 

One potential complication associated with the above approach to EPO receptor signal dissection is the predicted expression of chimeric receptors at an early stage of erythroid development. A system was developed, therefore, to bypass this limitation and to provide high frequencies of developmentally synchronized CFUe. This involved the treatment of mice with TAP at doses that block the development of early erythroid progenitor cells in marrow (especially erythroid burst-forming units) and that induce a synchronous wave of splenic erythropoiesis after TAP withdrawal. As described originally by Nijhof et al27 and recently optimized by our laboratory,28 this regimen of TAP treatment yields (at 72 hours after TAP withdrawal) a relatively high-frequency cohort of CFUe. In Figure 2 (upper panel), these developing cells are profiled by Northern blot analysis of endogenous c-Kit, EPO receptor, and β^maj globin transcripts. Recently, we also optimized conditions for the efficient in vitro development of these erythroid cells.28 In Figure 2 (lower panel), their synchronous EPO-dependent development as Ter119⁺ cells39 is shown together with morphologic profiles (insets) of early CFUe, late CFUe, and maturing erythroblasts.

In primary CFUe isolated from TAP-treated transgenic mice, the abilities of the chimeric EPO receptor forms EE-T-Y343 and EE-T-Y343F to activate STAT5 were first assayed (Figure3). Erythroid splenocytes at the CFUe stage were isolated from mice at 72 hours after TAP withdrawal, cultured for 5 hours in the absence of cytokines, and exposed for 7.5 minutes to hEGF (±15 ng/mL). Nuclear extracts then were prepared, and STAT5 DNA-binding activity was assayed by electrophoretic mobility shift using a ³²P-labeled interferon γ–activated site from the β-casein promoter.17 In these primary cells, STAT5 DNA-binding activity was activated efficiently by hEGF via EE-T-Y343 and was inhibited specifically by a 50-fold excess of this unlabeled cassette (but not by an irrelevant element from the NFκB gene promoter). In contrast, hEGF failed to activate STAT5 in cells from EE-T-Y343F mice, whereas EPO-activation of STAT5 by endogenous receptors was obvious in these cells. In parallel experiments, cells exposed to hEGF (or EPO) also were placed in CFUe differentiation assays, and the responsiveness of cells from EE-T-Y343 and EE-T-Y343F mice was confirmed (data not shown, and see below).

Next, the abilities of EE-T-Y343 and EE-T-Y343F receptor forms to support CFUe development to hemoglobinized colonies were studied. The outcomes of previous analyses of bioactivities of PY-null EPO receptor forms in retrovirally transduced CFUe from fetal liver12 40predicted that little activity would be exerted by EE-T-Y343F. However, this EPO receptor form proved to support the formation of hemoglobinized colonies at significant levels. Representative colony-forming assays are shown in Figure4A, and they illustrate that colony sizes were essentially normal but were decreased in frequency compared with the number of colonies formed on EPO activation of the endogenous wild-type EPO receptor or on hEGF-activation of the PY³⁴³-containing chimera EE-T-Y343 in EE-T-Y343 mice. Analyses of 5 independent mice confirmed an overall 3-fold relative deficiency in the ability of EE-T-Y343F to support hemoglobinized colony formation (Table 1). For EE-T-Y343, activity overall was slightly above that of the endogenous EPO receptor. In this assay system, essentially no hemoglobin-positive cells formed in the absence of EPO or hEGF (and hEGF exerted no detectable effects on erythroid progenitor cells from nontransgenic mice). Therefore, any possible production of EPO by erythroid progenitor cells (or possible elevated EPO levels in TAP-treated mice) was insufficient to affect assay outcomes.

Whether the decreased ability of EE-T-Y343F to support the production of hemoglobinized cells might be revealed as a stage-specific defect next was investigated. Here, flow cytometry was used to monitor the EPO receptor-dependent decrease in the size of maturing Ter119⁺ erythroblasts in vitro (in pilot experiments, maturation was shown to be essentially complete by 48 hours of culture). For CFUe from EE-T-Y343 mice, this highly reproducible profile of development was observed at 48 hours of culture in the presence of either EPO (5 U/mL) or hEGF (5 ng/mL). In contrast, CFUe from EE-T-Y343F mice were reduced in their ability to develop in the presence of hEGF (but not EPO) from an immature population of Ter119⁺ large cells to a compartment of smaller, mature erythroblasts (Figure 4B). Outcomes from 3 independent experiments were uniform, and they underscore this stage-specific attenuation in CFUe development as supported by the PY-null EPO receptor form EE-T-Y343F (Table 2).

The efficient expansion of BFUe and early CFUe is known to depend on synergistic cosignaling between the EPO receptor and c-Kit.41,42 As shown in Figure 1, splenic erythroid progenitor cells, when isolated from TAP-treated mice 68 to 72 hours after TAP withdrawal, correspond closely to early CFUe and express c-Kit transcripts at relatively high levels. Using this population of erythroid progenitor cells from TAP-treated EE-T-Y343 and EE-T-Y343F transgenic mice, independent versus combined effects of SCF, EPO, and hEGF exposure on proliferation were assayed quantitatively based on stimulated rates of [³H]-thymidine incorporation. This format was developed based on the known ability of c-Kit to transduce primarily proliferative signals in this lineage,43 the consideration that SCF was included in the above CFUe differentiation assays (see Figures 3, 4), and models in which EPO receptor–c-Kit synergy has been proposed to involve demonstrable trans-phosphorylation of the EPO receptor by c-Kit.44 

In these experiments (Figure 5), proliferative effects of EPO, hEGF, and SCF alone first were tested independently over a range of concentrations. In addition, synergy was assessed by including SCF at half-maximal dose (50 ng/mL) or less while varying the concentrations of EPO and hEGF. With regard to signaling by the endogenous EPO receptor and c-Kit, maximal proliferative responses in cells from all mice tested depended on coexposure to EPO and SCF, and this response was approximately 5-fold above either EPO or SCF alone (and on average was 2-fold above their additive effects). With regard to activities of chimeric receptors, in keeping with the results of the above CFUe development–differentiation assays, the proliferative activity of EE-T-Y343 in the presence of hEGF (and the absence of SCF) was greater than that of the endogenous EPO receptor, whereas that of EE-T-Y343F was lower (Figure 5, open symbols). Interestingly, however, when SCF was included in hEGF dose-response assays, not only EE-T-Y343 but also EE-T-Y343F proved to mediate synergy with c-Kit at comparably high capacities. Maximal synergy (1.8-fold above additive effects) between EE-T-Y343 and c-Kit was observed at lower doses of hEGF and was decreased to 1.3-fold at the highest dose of hEGF, whereas synergy between EE-T-Y343F and c-Kit increased from 1.4- to 2.2-fold from lower to higher concentrations of hEGF. This increased ability of EE-T-Y343F to synergize with c-Kit at higher hEGF doses may reflect the lower overall proliferative activity of the EE-T-Y343F receptor (in the presence of hEGF alone) and suggests that SCF–c-Kit may be more important in the hEGF-dependent expansion of erythroid progenitors from EE-T-Y343F mice than from EE-T-Y343 mice. Taken together, these experiments reveal first that EE-T-Y343 and EE-Y343F receptor forms are able to signal, albeit with comparably limited potency, in the absence of c-Kit activation. Second, they also reveal that each receptor form retains a relatively high capacity to cointegrate proliferative signals relayed by c-Kit.

Possible roles for PY³⁴³ and STAT5 during EPO-dependent erythropoiesis are the subject of controversy. One aim of the current study was to test the extent to which a PY-null EPO receptor form might support the development of adult primary CFUe in the absence of the detectable activation of STAT5. Investigations revealed an ability of the PY-null receptor form EE-T-Y343F to support late-stage adult erythropoiesis but to be compromised in this activity compared with STAT5-activating EE-T-Y343 or endogenous EPO receptor forms. This outcome is consistent with the results of recently published receptor knock-in experiments in which a PY-null EPO receptor form also was observed to support erythropoiesis in vivo yet consistently indicated less than wild-type activity.45 By comparison, the current model system circumvents compensatory events that may be realized during the development of knock-in mice and is well controlled for extrinsic factors.

The ability of EE-T-Y343F to support CFUe development at significant levels raises several interesting questions. One is the issue of how Jak2-initiated signals are transduced in the absence of receptor tyrosine sites. One possibility is that certain known factors may somehow be activated by EE-T-Y343F. PI-3 kinase comprises one candidate because this factor has been shown, in at least certain systems, to be activated detectably by PY-null EPO receptor forms46,47 and because LY294002 inhibition of this kinase limits CFUe development.48 Alternatively, EPO receptor PY-independent signals may be sufficient to mediate erythroid cell development. Although factors that couple the EPO receptor and Jak2 to PY-independent downstream events are unknown, our laboratory17 and Quelle et al33 have demonstrated (in cell lines) an EPO receptor PY-independent route to c-myc gene transcription. In FDC cells, we also have recently shown that a similar route may be used during the EPO-induced transcription of dipeptidyl-peptidase I precursor and calcyclin-binding protein genes.17 

Also of significant interest is the currently described reduced activity of the EE-T-Y343F receptor form in promoting CFUe production and its linkage to a stage-specific defect in Ter119⁺proerythroblast maturation. This defect, compared with the efficient activity of EE-T-Y343, could be attributable to possible differences in the steady state expression levels of these 2 transgenic receptors (levels of EE-T-Y343 expression were detectably higher than EE-T-Y343F; see Figure 1). However, estimates of receptor densities showed each chimera to be expressed on the order of several thousand receptors per cell. In addition (and as discussed below), the EPO receptor form EE-T-Y343F also retained essentially full activity in cosignaling with c-Kit, and defects in EE-T-Y343F activity persisted even when hEGF concentrations were sharply limited. Because EE-T-Y343F failed to detectably activate STAT5 and because PY³⁴³ and STAT5 have been proposed to couple EPO receptor signals to Bcl-x_L,16,17 one mechanism underlying this defect might involve a decreased survival rate for maturing EE-T-Y343F proerythroblasts. However, additional targets for STAT5 likely exist within the EPO receptor-signaling network that normally might also affect maturation or survival. For example, using FDC cells and initially a limited cDNA micro-array, we recently described one such example target gene whose activation by the EPO receptor depends on PY³⁴³—proliferation-associated protein I.17Although these considerations underscore roles for the EPO receptor and PY³⁴³ in progenitor cell survival, the apparent inability of Bcl-x_L or Bcl-2 to rescue CFUe development in fetal liver or transgenic mice in the absence of EPO signaling49suggests that more than simple survival signals might be activated by the endogenous EPO receptor and by fully bio-active forms such as EE-T-Y343.

Finally, we have analyzed the extent to which EE-T-Y343 and EE-T-Y343F might act in synergy with c-Kit. As revealed originally by the phenotypes of mice with naturally occurring mutations in eitherc-Kit or SCF–Kit ligand genes, c-Kit signaling is essential for normal erythropoiesis.50 In addition, the ability of c-Kit and the EPO receptor to act in synergy also has been established in experiments describing the effects of their coadministration in vivo51 and their coinclusion in assays of BFUe and CFUe formation.41,42 In cell line models, stimulation of c-Kit has been shown to result in tyrosine phosphorylation of the EPO receptor, and a model for receptor interaction has been proposed in which c-Kit may directly bind and phosphorylate EPO receptor complexes.44 In addition, our laboratory17 and others42 have provided evidence that the mitogen-activated protein kinases Erk1 and Erk2 at least in part may function as downstream integrators of EPO receptor and c-Kit signals. In the current studies, the PY-null form EE-T-Y343F retained the capacity to synergize with c-Kit. This result underscores the likelihood that an EPO receptor PY-independent axis contributes to EPO receptor–c-Kit cosignaling. The currently described ability to prepare useful numbers of developmentally synchronized EPO receptor⁺, c-Kit⁺ CFUe from EE-T-Y343 and EE-T-Y343F mice also should significantly assist molecular dissections of c-Kit–activated pathways that specifically enhance EPO-dependent erythropoiesis.

We thank Dr Cindy E. McKinney for expert efforts in the production of transgenic mice.