Abstract
Background: Patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) ALL have limited therapeutical options. Monoclonal antibodies have shown to be effective. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (CMC-544) is a humanized anti-CD22 antibody conjugated to calicheamicin that has shown activity as a single agent in R/R ALL with 58% ORR in a phase II trial. More recently, a randomized phase III trial showed improvement of response rates of up to 80% compared to 30% for standard of care. Despite the high overall response rate to inotuzumab, responses are short-lived and most patients relapse.
Aim: The purpose of this study is to assess the outcome of patients with R/R ALL post inotuzumab ozogamicin failure.
Methods: We reviewed 151 patients with R/R ALL treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin as single agent (n=103) or part of a salvage regimen therapy (n=48) between 2009 and 2015. From this cohort of 151, we identified 67 (44%) patients with a median age of 47 years (4-84) who had either not responded to inotuzumab (n=42) or failed after a prior response of 2 months, range (<1 - 29) (n=25) and in whom a follow-up was available. These patients were evaluated for outcome analysis.
Results: Patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. The best prior response to inotuzumab included CR in 7 (10%) patients, CRp in 14 (21%), and CRi in 4 (6%). After a median follow-up of 19 months, (range, 1- 54) from inotuzumab failure, 6 patients (9%) remain alive. The median survival was 4 months, and the estimated 12-month survival rate was 13%. The median survival were 9 months, 3.5 months, and 3.4 months, respectively, for patients who received and failed inotuzumab as first salvage therapy, second salvage therapy, and third or more salvage therapy (P= 0.006). The estimated 12-month survival rates were 29%, 4%, and 10%, respectively. Patients with inotuzumab refractory disease had worse outcome post intozumab failure compared to those who responded and lost their response subsequently; the median overall survival post inotuzumab failure was 3 and 6 months (p=0.01), respectively . Among patients who relapsed, two received subsequent salvage therapy with blinatumomab. One of them responded and achieved a CR for 4 months. Four patients received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation; one of them remain alive at 55+ months.
Conclusion: Outcome after inotuzumab failure is poor with a median survival of 4.4 months; these patients should be referred to clinical trials. Further use of inotuzumab ozogamicin earlier in the course of treatment may further improve the outcome.
Characteristics . | n = 67 . | |
---|---|---|
. | N . | (%) . |
Median age, [range] | 47 [4-84] | |
Age | ||
< 40 | 29 | (43) |
40-60 | 16 | (24) |
>60 | 22 | (33) |
Sex | ||
M | 30 | (45) |
F | 37 | (55) |
Performance Status | ||
0-1 | 59 | (88) |
2 | 7 | (10) |
3 | 1 | (1) |
ALL sub-type | ||
Pre-b ALL | 65 | (97) |
biphenotypic | 2 | (3) |
Cytogenetics | ||
Ph+ | 11 | (16) |
t(4;11) | 9 | (13) |
Complex | 13 | (19) |
Diploid | 8 | (12) |
Other | 26 | (39) |
Hematological Parameters | ||
Median WBC at start | 4.1 [0.3-48.5] | |
Median WBC at Fail | 2.3 [0-121.4] | |
Median PB, blasts at start | 24.5 [0-93] | |
Median, PB, Blasts at fail | 5.1 [0-96] | |
Median BM Blasts at start | 75 [13-98] | |
Median BM Blasts at fail* | 65 [0-99] | |
Timing of Inotuzumab after Relapse | ||
as first salvage therapy | 21 | (31) |
as second salvage therapy | 27 | (40) |
as ≥ third salvage therapy | 19 | (28) |
Number of Inotuzumab cycles | ||
1 to 2 cycles | 42 | (63) |
3 to 4 cycles | 18 | (27) |
5 to 6 cycles | 7 | (10) |
Characteristics . | n = 67 . | |
---|---|---|
. | N . | (%) . |
Median age, [range] | 47 [4-84] | |
Age | ||
< 40 | 29 | (43) |
40-60 | 16 | (24) |
>60 | 22 | (33) |
Sex | ||
M | 30 | (45) |
F | 37 | (55) |
Performance Status | ||
0-1 | 59 | (88) |
2 | 7 | (10) |
3 | 1 | (1) |
ALL sub-type | ||
Pre-b ALL | 65 | (97) |
biphenotypic | 2 | (3) |
Cytogenetics | ||
Ph+ | 11 | (16) |
t(4;11) | 9 | (13) |
Complex | 13 | (19) |
Diploid | 8 | (12) |
Other | 26 | (39) |
Hematological Parameters | ||
Median WBC at start | 4.1 [0.3-48.5] | |
Median WBC at Fail | 2.3 [0-121.4] | |
Median PB, blasts at start | 24.5 [0-93] | |
Median, PB, Blasts at fail | 5.1 [0-96] | |
Median BM Blasts at start | 75 [13-98] | |
Median BM Blasts at fail* | 65 [0-99] | |
Timing of Inotuzumab after Relapse | ||
as first salvage therapy | 21 | (31) |
as second salvage therapy | 27 | (40) |
as ≥ third salvage therapy | 19 | (28) |
Number of Inotuzumab cycles | ||
1 to 2 cycles | 42 | (63) |
3 to 4 cycles | 18 | (27) |
5 to 6 cycles | 7 | (10) |
*Patients with 0 BM Blast had extramedullary disease
Chahoud:American Society of Hematology (ASH): Other: 2015 HONORS Award recipient. Off Label Use: Inotuzumab.. Cortes:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy. Pemmaraju:Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.